Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +6.06% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| HUYA | $558M | — | — | 0.6× | -84.7% | 13.4% | -1.7% | -2.3% | -2.3% | — | 78 |
Peers = companies sharing HUYA's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $929.8M 100.0% | $6.08B 100.0% | $6.99B 100.0% | $9.26B 100.0% | $11.35B 100.0% | $10.91B 100.0% | $8.37B 100.0% | $4.66B 100.0% | $2.18B 100.0% | $796.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $805.1M 86.6% | $5.27B 86.7% | $6.18B 88.3% | $8.61B 92.9% | $9.75B 85.9% | $8.65B 79.2% | $6.89B 82.3% | $3.93B 84.4% | $1.93B 88.3% | $1.09B 137.4% |
| Gross Profit | $124.7M 13.4% | $809.5M 13.3% | $815.2M 11.7% | $653.6M 7.1% | $1.60B 14.1% | $2.27B 20.8% | $1.48B 17.7% | $729.8M 15.6% | $255.0M 11.7% | -$297.7M -37.4% |
| Research & Development | $71.0M 7.6% | $512.6M 8.4% | $578.6M 8.3% | $684.4M 7.4% | $818.9M 7.2% | $734.3M 6.7% | $508.7M 6.1% | $265.2M 5.7% | $170.2M 7.8% | $188.3M 23.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $44.2M 4.8% | $254.8M 4.2% | $320.8M 4.6% | $341.2M 3.7% | $326.8M 2.9% | $445.0M 4.1% | $352.8M 4.2% | $287.7M 6.2% | $102.0M 4.7% | $71.3M 9.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $153.3M 16.5% | $1.04B 17.1% | $1.34B 19.2% | $1.56B 16.8% | $1.91B 16.8% | $1.74B 15.9% | $1.30B 15.5% | $742.1M 15.9% | $359.4M 16.5% | $328.4M 41.2% |
| Operating Income | -$23.2M -2.5% | -$189.6M -3.1% | -$443.6M -6.3% | -$736.2M -7.9% | -$30.2M -0.3% | $725.0M 6.6% | $261.4M 3.1% | $26.7M 0.6% | -$94.9M -4.3% | -$626.1M -78.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $27.3M 2.9% | $391.4M 6.4% | $479.7M 6.9% | $298.2M 3.2% | $247.0M 2.2% | $313.4M 2.9% | $304.5M 3.6% | $156.5M 3.4% | $14.0M 0.6% | $518K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | -$13.9M -1.5% | -$34.5M -0.6% | -$191.3M -2.7% | -$522.8M -5.6% | $259.5M 2.3% | $1.03B 9.5% | $567.0M 6.8% | -$2.10B -45.1% | -$80.8M -3.7% | -$625.6M -78.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $1.8M 0.2% | $13.5M 0.2% | $13.2M 0.2% | $24.4M 0.3% | $55.2M 0.5% | $176.8M 1.6% | $96.1M 1.1% | -$50.9M -1.1% | — | — |
| Net Income | -$16.1M -1.7% | -$48.0M -0.8% | -$204.5M -2.9% | -$547.7M -5.9% | $583.5M 5.1% | $884.2M 8.1% | $468.2M 5.6% | -$1.94B -41.6% | -$81.0M -3.7% | -$625.6M -78.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.07 | $-0.21 | $-0.84 | $-2.27 | $2.45 | $3.89 | $2.18 | $-15.02 | $-1.01 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.21 | $-0.84 | $-2.27 | $2.41 | $3.71 | $2.02 | $-15.02 | $-1.01 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 228.8M | 231.5M | 243.0M | 241.4M | 238.2M | 227.1M | 214.8M | 166.8M | 100.0M | 100.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 228.8M | 231.5M | 243.0M | 241.4M | 241.8M | 238.6M | 232.0M | 166.8M | 100.0M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $344M dividends + $13M buybacks = $357M returned on -$49M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 84.4 | 82.3 | 79.2 | 85.9 | 92.9 | 88.3 | 86.7 | 86.6 |
| Gross Profit | 15.6 | 17.7 | 20.8 | 14.1 | 7.1 | 11.7 | 13.3 | 13.4 |
| R&D | 5.7 | 6.1 | 6.7 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 7.6 |
| SG&A | 6.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Operating Income | 0.6 | 3.1 | 6.6 | -0.3 | -7.9 | -6.3 | -3.1 | -2.5 |
| Income Tax | -1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Net Income | -41.6 | 5.6 | 8.1 | 5.1 | -5.9 | -2.9 | -0.8 | -1.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on HUYA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.