Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -3.75% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $1.81 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -60.0%/yr for a decade (off $247M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.09B shares · net debt -$136M
mean -31.9% · volatility σ 90% · implied rate exceeded in 4/7 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (90%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| JELD | $155M | — | — | 0.1× | -14.9% | 16.0% | -19.3% | -674% | -674% | — | 146 |
Peers = companies sharing JELD's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$125M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -674%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $136M covers the $66M due within a year 2.1× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2019-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 11th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 78.9 | 79.7 | 78.7 | 80.3 | 82.7 | 80.7 | 81.8 | 84.0 |
| Gross Profit | 21.1 | 20.3 | 21.3 | 19.7 | 17.3 | 19.3 | 18.2 | 16.0 |
| SG&A | 16.9 | 15.4 | 16.6 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 15.2 | 17.3 | 17.2 |
| Operating Income | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 1.3 | 3.3 | -3.3 | -13.0 |
| Income Tax | -0.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 4.6 |
| Net Income | 3.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | -5.0 | -19.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on JELD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.21B 100.0% | $3.78B 100.0% | $4.30B 100.0% | $4.54B 100.0% | $4.18B 100.0% | $4.24B 100.0% | $4.29B 100.0% | $4.35B 100.0% | $3.76B 100.0% | $3.67B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.70B 84.0% | $3.09B 81.8% | $3.47B 80.7% | $3.76B 82.7% | $3.36B 80.3% | $3.33B 78.7% | $3.42B 79.7% | $3.43B 78.9% | $2.92B 77.5% | $2.89B 78.9% |
| Gross Profit | $514.2M 16.0% | $689.0M 18.2% | $832.6M 19.3% | $785.9M 17.3% | $822.9M 19.7% | $901.9M 21.3% | $872.5M 20.3% | $918.5M 21.1% | $847.5M 22.5% | $775.0M 21.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $551.1M 17.2% | $652.5M 17.3% | $655.3M 15.2% | $654.1M 14.4% | $604.5M 14.5% | $702.7M 16.6% | $660.6M 15.4% | $734.2M 16.9% | $573.0M 15.2% | $553.3M 15.1% |
| Operating Income | -$416.0M -13.0% | -$126.4M -3.3% | $141.6M 3.3% | $59.3M 1.3% | $215.8M 5.2% | $188.7M 4.5% | $190.4M 4.4% | $167.0M 3.8% | $261.5M 6.9% | $207.9M 5.7% |
| Interest Expense | $67.2M 2.1% | $67.2M 1.8% | $72.3M 1.7% | $82.5M 1.8% | $76.8M 1.8% | $74.8M 1.8% | $71.8M 1.7% | $70.8M 1.6% | $79.0M 2.1% | $77.6M 2.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $9.1M 0.3% | $24.8M 0.7% | $25.7M 0.6% | $53.4M 1.2% | $13.2M 0.3% | $2.8M 0.1% | $1.4M 0.0% | $34.9M 0.8% | -$40.1M -1.1% | -$1.4M -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$474.3M -14.8% | -$170.8M -4.5% | $88.6M 2.1% | $30.3M 0.7% | $151.0M 3.6% | $116.7M 2.8% | $120.0M 2.8% | $131.0M 3.0% | $142.3M 3.8% | $128.9M 3.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $147.9M 4.6% | $16.8M 0.4% | $63.3M 1.5% | $18.0M 0.4% | $19.6M 0.5% | $25.1M 0.6% | $57.1M 1.3% | -$10.1M -0.2% | $137.8M 3.7% | -$246.8M -6.7% |
| Net Income | -$621.2M -19.3% | -$189.0M -5.0% | $62.4M 1.5% | $45.7M 1.0% | $168.8M 4.0% | $91.6M 2.2% | $63.0M 1.5% | $141.9M 3.3% | $8.1M 0.2% | $376.1M 10.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-7.29 | $-2.22 | $0.73 | $0.53 | $1.75 | $0.91 | $0.63 | $1.36 | $-0.02 | $-1.08 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-7.29 | $-2.22 | $0.73 | $0.53 | $1.72 | $0.90 | $0.62 | $1.33 | $-0.02 | $-1.08 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 85.3M | 85.0M | 85.0M | 86.4M | 96.6M | 100.6M | 100.6M | 104.5M | 97.5M | 18.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 85.3M | 85.0M | 85.9M | 87.1M | 98.4M | 101.7M | 101.5M | 106.4M | 97.5M | 18.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.