Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.23% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.5M 100.0% | $23.1M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $27.4M 89.7% | $18.1M 78.2% |
| Gross Profit | $3.2M 10.3% | $5.0M 21.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $7.4M 24.1% | $4.8M 20.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $8.8M 28.8% | $5.1M 22.0% |
| Operating Income | -$5.7M -18.5% | -$34K -0.1% |
| Interest Expense | $489 0.0% | $33K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $507K 1.7% | $193K 0.8% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $382K 1.3% | $153K 0.7% |
| Net Income | -$5.3M -17.3% | $119K 0.5% |
| Per Share | ||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.31 | $0.01 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.31 | $0.01 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 17.0M | 15.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 17.0M | 15.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.47 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.8%/yr for a decade (off $3M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$22M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
1/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$12M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 2 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 2 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 190 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $165.2B | 170.7× | — | 15.3× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.6% | 2.2% | 1.5% | — | 1,425 |
| EQIX | $103.7B | 76.8× | 26.2× | 11.3× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 9.5% | — | 1,229 |
| AMT | $78.4B | 31.1× | 12.9× | 7.4× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 72.0% | — | 1,662 |
| O | $58.6B | 53.6× | — | 10.2× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| XHG | $47.8B | — | — | 932.4× | -82.2% | 2.2% | -205% | 11.9% | 12.4% | — | 1 |
| PLDGP | $47.6B | 14.4× | — | 5.4× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 9 |
| CBRE | $44.7B | 39.3× | — | 1.1× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| VTR | $43.9B | 171.3× | — | 7.5× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| IRM | $37.6B | 259.4× | 24.5× | 5.5× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.4× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $31.7B | 32.7× | 14.8× | 9.4× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| VICI | $28.2B | 10.1× | — | 7.0× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| SBAC | $18.9B | 18.2× | 20.0× | 6.7× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 17.2% | 7.4× | 636 |
| BEKE | $18.7B | 140.8× | 40.7× | 1.4× | -85.5% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.4% | 0.4× | 197 |
| INVH | $18.6B | 31.8× | — | 6.8× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| WY | $18.6B | 57.4× | 18.7× | 2.7× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.1× | 868 |
| ESS | $18.6B | 27.7× | 12.3× | 9.8× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| JLL | $17.5B | 22.8× | 13.8× | 0.7× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 9.3% | 0.8× | 615 |
| HST | $17.3B | 22.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| LAMR | $16.1B | 27.4× | — | 7.1× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 14.0% | — | 655 |
| WPC | $15.8B | — | — | 9.2× | 8.4% | — | 27.2% | 5.7% | 2.8% | — | 834 |
| DOC | $15.1B | 217.9× | — | 5.4× | 4.5% | — | 2.5% | 1.0% | 0.4% | — | 724 |
| SUI | $14.9B | 11.2× | — | 6.5× | 2.0% | — | 61.3% | 20.3% | 20.3% | — | 487 |
| OHI | $14.4B | 25.1× | — | 12.1× | 13.2% | — | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 718 |
| JFB | $76M | — | — | 2.5× | 32.3% | 10.3% | -17.3% | -13.9% | -13.9% | — | 33 |
Peers = companies sharing JFB's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 519.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 78.2 | 89.7 |
| Gross Profit | 21.8 | 10.3 |
| SG&A | 20.9 | 24.1 |
| Operating Income | -0.1 | -18.5 |
| Net Income | 0.5 | -17.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on JFB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 33 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.