Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.00% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04 · 16d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $53.6M 100.0% | $316.2M 100.0% | $290.2M 100.0% | $328.8M 100.0% | $357.3M 100.0% | $471.6M 100.0% | $906.5M 100.0% | $714.1M 100.0% | $284.7M 100.0% | $70.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $17.6M 32.8% | $107.1M 33.9% | $90.9M 31.3% | $103.1M 31.3% | $92.4M 25.9% | $265.4M 56.3% | $649.6M 71.7% | $517.1M 72.4% | $213.4M 74.9% | $47.7M 67.9% |
| Gross Profit | $36.0M 67.2% | $209.0M 66.1% | $199.3M 68.7% | $225.8M 68.7% | $264.9M 74.1% | $206.2M 43.7% | $256.9M 28.3% | $197.1M 27.6% | $71.3M 25.1% | $22.6M 32.1% |
| Research & Development | $15.0M 27.9% | $94.8M 30.0% | $121.8M 42.0% | $154.5M 47.0% | $206.7M 57.9% | $174.6M 37.0% | $176.2M 19.4% | $134.4M 18.8% | $71.7M 25.2% | $33.7M 47.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $6.9M 12.9% | $45.4M 14.4% | $45.7M 15.7% | $105.4M 32.1% | $79.9M 22.4% | $119.1M 25.3% | $109.3M 12.1% | $71.6M 10.0% | $32.4M 11.4% | $13.5M 19.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $36.3M 67.7% | $225.2M 71.2% | $250.2M 86.2% | $358.2M 108.9% | $403.1M 112.8% | $396.0M 84.0% | $404.1M 44.6% | $289.9M 40.6% | $163.8M 57.5% | $80.3M 114.1% |
| Operating Income | $101K 0.2% | -$9.9M -3.1% | -$40.5M -14.0% | -$100.9M -30.7% | -$138.1M -38.7% | -$189.8M -40.3% | -$147.2M -16.2% | -$92.8M -13.0% | -$92.4M -32.5% | -$57.7M -82.0% |
| Interest Expense | $11K 0.0% | $132K 0.0% | $114K 0.0% | $3.1M 1.0% | $8.8M 2.5% | $11.7M 2.5% | $11.1M 1.2% | $7.1M 1.0% | $122K 0.0% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $186K 0.3% | $2.9M 0.9% | $1.2M 0.4% | $2.3M 0.7% | $6.6M 1.8% | $6.1M 1.3% | $6.3M 0.7% | $3.7M 0.5% | $314K 0.1% | $283K 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $379K 0.7% | -$6.7M -2.1% | -$64.6M -22.2% | -$108.9M -33.1% | -$140.6M -39.3% | -$225.0M -47.7% | -$109.7M -12.1% | -$66.2M -9.3% | -$94.3M -33.1% | -$57.5M -81.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | $10K 0.0% | $110K 0.0% | -$1.9M -0.6% | -$455K -0.1% | $32K 0.0% | $86K 0.0% | $162K 0.0% | $30K 0.0% | -$4.0M -1.4% | $3.9M 5.6% |
| Net Income | $61K 0.1% | -$7.0M -2.2% | -$62.1M -21.4% | -$107.0M -32.5% | -$140.6M -39.3% | -$225.1M -47.7% | -$109.8M -12.1% | -$66.2M -9.3% | -$90.3M -31.7% | -$61.4M -87.3% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.91 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -51.6%/yr for a decade (off $7M normalized FCF).
The market's -51.6% is more conservative than its 5-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares (market data) · net debt -$24M
mean -68.3% · volatility σ 279% · implied rate exceeded in 1/2 yrs
Central path = implied -51.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (279%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $1M buybacks = $1M returned on $9M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 11 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-04
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 72.4 | 71.7 | 56.3 | 25.9 | 31.3 | 31.3 | 33.9 | 32.8 |
| Gross Profit | 27.6 | 28.3 | 43.7 | 74.1 | 68.7 | 68.7 | 66.1 | 67.2 |
| R&D | 18.8 | 19.4 | 37.0 | 57.9 | 47.0 | 42.0 | 30.0 | 27.9 |
| SG&A | 10.0 | 12.1 | 25.3 | 22.4 | 32.1 | 15.7 | 14.4 | 12.9 |
| Operating Income | -13.0 | -16.2 | -40.3 | -38.7 | -30.7 | -14.0 | -3.1 | 0.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -9.3 | -12.1 | -47.7 | -39.3 | -32.5 | -21.4 | -2.2 | 0.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on JG: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| JG | $29M | — | 22.4× | 0.6× | -83.0% | 67.2% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 11 |
Peers = companies sharing JG's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.