Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -5.76% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| JOUT | $498M | — | 83.6× | 0.8× | -0.1% | 35.1% | -5.8% | -8.2% | -8.2% | 0.0× | 132 |
Peers = companies sharing JOUT's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $592.4M 100.0% | $592.8M 100.0% | $663.8M 100.0% | $743.4M 100.0% | $751.7M 100.0% | $594.2M 100.0% | $562.4M 100.0% | $544.3M 100.0% | $490.6M 100.0% | $433.7M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $384.3M 64.9% | $391.9M 66.1% | $419.8M 63.2% | $472.0M 63.5% | $417.5M 55.5% | $329.2M 55.4% | $312.7M 55.6% | $302.4M 55.6% | $279.6M 57.0% | $257.3M 59.3% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $279.6M 57.0% | $257.3M 59.3% |
| Gross Profit | $208.1M 35.1% | $201.0M 33.9% | $244.1M 36.8% | $271.3M 36.5% | $334.1M 44.5% | $265.0M 44.6% | $249.8M 44.4% | $241.9M 44.4% | $210.9M 43.0% | $176.5M 40.7% |
| Research & Development | $32.2M 5.4% | $31.1M 5.2% | $31.4M 4.7% | $27.7M 3.7% | $25.7M 3.4% | $24.6M 4.1% | $21.9M 3.9% | $20.4M 3.8% | $19.2M 3.9% | $18.4M 4.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $57.6M 9.7% | $57.6M 9.7% | $56.5M 8.5% | $43.4M 5.8% | $56.1M 7.5% | $47.8M 8.0% | $42.6M 7.6% | $45.6M 8.4% | $45.8M 9.3% | $38.3M 8.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $224.3M 37.9% | $244.5M 41.2% | $232.3M 35.0% | $205.0M 27.6% | $222.8M 29.6% | $193.9M 32.6% | $186.0M 33.1% | $178.8M 32.9% | $165.3M 33.7% | $153.6M 35.4% |
| Operating Income | -$16.2M -2.7% | -$43.5M -7.3% | $11.7M 1.8% | $66.3M 8.9% | $111.3M 14.8% | $71.1M 12.0% | $63.8M 11.3% | $63.0M 11.6% | $45.6M 9.3% | $22.9M 5.3% |
| Interest Expense | $224K 0.0% | $152K 0.0% | $152K 0.0% | $153K 0.0% | $145K 0.0% | $143K 0.0% | $172K 0.0% | $203K 0.0% | $757K 0.2% | $727K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.4M 0.6% | $9.0M 1.5% | $9.7M 1.5% | -$8.1M -1.1% | $1.4M 0.2% | $1.4M 0.2% | $796K 0.1% | $4.1M 0.8% | $3.1M 0.6% | $1.4M 0.3% |
| Pretax Income | -$9.3M -1.6% | -$29.9M -5.0% | $25.8M 3.9% | $58.9M 7.9% | $112.9M 15.0% | $73.7M 12.4% | $66.5M 11.8% | $68.1M 12.5% | $48.2M 9.8% | $23.7M 5.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $25.0M 4.2% | -$3.3M -0.6% | $6.3M 0.9% | $14.4M 1.9% | $29.5M 3.9% | $18.5M 3.1% | $15.1M 2.7% | $27.4M 5.0% | $13.1M 2.7% | $10.2M 2.3% |
| Net Income | -$34.3M -5.8% | -$26.5M -4.5% | $19.5M 2.9% | $44.5M 6.0% | $83.4M 11.1% | $55.2M 9.3% | $51.4M 9.1% | $40.7M 7.5% | $35.2M 7.2% | $13.5M 3.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 10.3M | 10.2M | 10.2M | 10.2M | 10.1M | 10.1M | 10.0M | 10.0M | 9.9M | 9.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage flat year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $14M dividends + $121000 buybacks = $14M returned.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 17%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $176M covers all $7M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2016-09-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 55.6 | 55.6 | 55.4 | 55.5 | 63.5 | 63.2 | 66.1 | 64.9 |
| Gross Profit | 44.4 | 44.4 | 44.6 | 44.5 | 36.5 | 36.8 | 33.9 | 35.1 |
| R&D | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| SG&A | 8.4 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 8.5 | 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Operating Income | 11.6 | 11.3 | 12.0 | 14.8 | 8.9 | 1.8 | -7.3 | -2.7 |
| Income Tax | 5.0 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 | -0.6 | 4.2 |
| Net Income | 7.5 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 11.1 | 6.0 | 2.9 | -4.5 | -5.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on JOUT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.