Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.37% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $282.0M 100.0% | $240.5M 100.0% | $203.8M 100.0% | $219.5M 100.0% | $168.9M 100.0% | $147.5M 100.0% | $147.5M 100.0% | $146.6M 100.0% | $158.1M 100.0% | $138.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $201.6M 71.5% | $171.6M 71.4% | $151.7M 74.5% | $183.9M 83.8% | $144.7M 85.7% | $123.5M 83.7% | $124.1M 84.1% | $121.2M 82.7% | $125.9M 79.7% | $112.0M 80.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $112.0M 80.8% |
| Gross Profit | $80.4M 28.5% | $68.9M 28.6% | $52.1M 25.5% | $35.6M 16.2% | $24.2M 14.3% | $24.0M 16.3% | $23.4M 15.9% | $25.3M 17.3% | $32.2M 20.3% | $26.6M 19.2% |
| Research & Development | $898K 0.3% | $919K 0.4% | $920K 0.5% | $1.0M 0.5% | $990K 0.6% | $1.4M 1.0% | $1.8M 1.2% | $1.6M 1.1% | $1.5M 1.0% | $1.2M 0.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $63.7M 22.6% | $51.1M 21.2% | $33.8M 16.6% | $30.2M 13.8% | $26.8M 15.9% | $25.3M 17.2% | $25.8M 17.5% | $23.2M 15.8% | $22.2M 14.1% | $20.1M 14.5% |
| Operating Income | $16.7M 5.9% | $17.8M 7.4% | $18.3M 9.0% | $5.4M 2.4% | -$2.6M -1.5% | -$1.3M -0.9% | -$2.3M -1.6% | $2.1M 1.4% | $9.9M 6.3% | $6.5M 4.7% |
| Interest Expense | $3.9M 1.4% | $3.2M 1.3% | $1.8M 0.9% | $1.7M 0.8% | $632K 0.4% | $389K 0.3% | $493K 0.3% | $367K 0.3% | $299K 0.2% | $292K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $13.7M 4.9% | $14.8M 6.1% | $13.1M 6.4% | $4.5M 2.0% | -$2.5M -1.5% | -$2.6M -1.8% | -$2.9M -1.9% | $2.1M 1.5% | $9.6M 6.1% | $6.7M 4.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $3.3M 1.2% | $3.2M 1.3% | -$5.9M -2.9% | $3.1M 1.4% | $3.5M 2.1% | $990K 0.7% | $1.8M 1.2% | $446K 0.3% | $4.2M 2.6% | $2.1M 1.5% |
| Net Income | $9.6M 3.4% | $11.4M 4.7% | $18.8M 9.2% | $738K 0.3% | -$6.1M -3.6% | -$3.7M -2.5% | -$4.7M -3.2% | $1.5M 1.0% | $5.3M 3.3% | $4.5M 3.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.36 | $3.98 | $6.51 | $0.26 | $-2.20 | $-1.33 | $-1.70 | $0.56 | $1.94 | $1.67 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.22 | $3.83 | $6.38 | $0.25 | $-2.20 | $-1.33 | $-1.70 | $0.55 | $1.90 | $1.66 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 2.9M | 2.9M | 2.9M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.7M | 2.7M | 2.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 3.0M | 3.0M | 2.9M | 2.9M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.8M | 2.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 11%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~25.5% on $15M of debt.
Cash of $10M fully covers short-term debt of $74000.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.7 | 84.1 | 83.7 | 85.7 | 83.8 | 74.5 | 71.4 | 71.5 |
| Gross Profit | 17.3 | 15.9 | 16.3 | 14.3 | 16.2 | 25.5 | 28.6 | 28.5 |
| R&D | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Operating Income | 1.4 | -1.6 | -0.9 | -1.5 | 2.4 | 9.0 | 7.4 | 5.9 |
| Income Tax | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.4 | -2.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Net Income | 1.0 | -3.2 | -2.5 | -3.6 | 0.3 | 9.2 | 4.7 | 3.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KEQU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| KEQU | $104M | 11.3× | 4.8× | 0.4× | 17.3% | 28.5% | 3.4% | 12.9% | 10.7% | 0.7× | 30 |
Peers = companies sharing KEQU's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 32 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.