Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,987 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 38%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.16B 100.0% | $9.81B 100.0% | $10.50B 100.0% | $9.21B 100.0% | $6.92B 100.0% | $5.81B 100.0% | $4.57B 100.0% | $4.04B 100.0% | $3.48B 100.0% | $2.98B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.75B 39.1% | $3.93B 40.0% | $4.22B 40.2% | $3.59B 39.0% | $2.77B 40.1% | $2.45B 42.2% | $1.87B 40.9% | $1.45B 35.8% | $1.29B 37.0% | $1.16B 39.0% |
| Research & Development | $1.36B 11.2% | $1.28B 13.0% | $1.30B 12.4% | $1.11B 12.0% | $928.5M 13.4% | $863.9M 14.9% | $711.0M 15.6% | $608.5M 15.1% | $526.7M 15.1% | $481.3M 16.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.03B 8.5% | $969.5M 9.9% | $986.3M 9.4% | $860.0M 9.3% | $729.6M 10.5% | $734.1M 12.6% | $599.1M 13.1% | $442.3M 11.0% | $388.2M 11.2% | $379.4M 12.7% |
| Interest Expense | $302.2M 2.5% | $311.3M 3.2% | $296.9M 2.8% | $160.3M 1.7% | $157.3M 2.3% | $160.3M 2.8% | $124.6M 2.7% | $114.4M 2.8% | $122.5M 3.5% | $122.9M 4.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $180.3M 1.5% | $160.7M 1.6% | $74.1M 0.7% | $8.7M 0.1% | $8.9M 0.1% | $21.6M 0.4% | $40.4M 0.9% | $36.9M 0.9% | $23.3M 0.7% | $14.5M 0.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $171.5M 1.4% | $155.1M 1.6% | $104.7M 1.0% | -$4.6M -0.0% | $29.3M 0.4% | -$2.7M -0.0% | $31.5M 0.7% | $30.5M 0.8% | -$6.0M -0.2% | $7.1M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $4.64B 38.2% | $3.19B 32.5% | $3.79B 36.1% | $3.49B 37.9% | $2.36B 34.1% | $1.32B 22.7% | $1.30B 28.4% | $1.46B 36.1% | $1.17B 33.7% | $858.2M 28.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $582.8M 4.8% | $428.1M 4.4% | $401.8M 3.8% | $167.2M 1.8% | $283.1M 4.1% | $101.7M 1.8% | $121.2M 2.7% | $653.7M 16.2% | $247.2M 7.1% | $153.8M 5.2% |
| Net Income | $4.06B 33.4% | $2.76B 28.1% | $3.39B 32.3% | $3.32B 36.1% | $2.08B 30.0% | $1.22B 21.0% | $1.18B 25.7% | $802.3M 19.9% | $926.1M 26.6% | $704.4M 23.6% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $30.53 | $20.41 | $24.28 | $22.07 | $13.49 | $7.76 | $7.53 | $5.13 | $5.92 | $4.52 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $30.37 | $20.28 | $24.15 | $21.92 | $13.37 | $7.70 | $7.49 | $5.10 | $5.88 | $4.49 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 133.0M | 135.3M | 139.5M | 150.5M | 154.1M | 156.8M | 156.1M | 156.3M | 156.5M | 155.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 133.8M | 136.2M | 140.2M | 151.6M | 155.4M | 158.0M | 156.9M | 157.4M | 157.5M | 156.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $192.80 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -3.9%/yr for a decade (off $3.4B normalized FCF).
The market's -3.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.13B shares · net debt $3.8B
mean 22.3% · volatility σ 25% · implied rate exceeded in 7/9 yrs
Central path = implied -3.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (25%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 24% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $905M dividends + $2.1B buybacks = $3.1B returned on $3.7B FCF.
8 consecutive years of dividend increases · 13%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2.1B covers the $0 due within a year 2078908000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2018-06-30 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.1% on $5.9B of debt.
Cash of $2.1B fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| KLAC | $25.5B | 6.3× | — | 2.1× | 23.9% | 60.9% | 33.4% | 86.6% | 38.4% | — | 1,987 |
Peers = companies sharing KLAC's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 35.8 | 40.9 | 42.2 | 40.1 | 39.0 | 40.2 | 40.0 | 39.1 |
| R&D | 15.1 | 15.6 | 14.9 | 13.4 | 12.0 | 12.4 | 13.0 | 11.2 |
| SG&A | 11.0 | 13.1 | 12.6 | 10.5 | 9.3 | 9.4 | 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Income Tax | 16.2 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| Net Income | 19.9 | 25.7 | 21.0 | 30.0 | 36.1 | 32.3 | 28.1 | 33.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KLAC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.