Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.00% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.99 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -60.0%/yr for a decade (off $19M normalized FCF).
The market's -60.0% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares (market data) · net debt -$102M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $227.9M 100.0% | $231.1M 100.0% | $340.2M 100.0% | $322.5M 100.0% | $316.8M 100.0% | $386.8M 100.0% | $655.6M 100.0% | $299.1M 100.0% | $120.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $96.4M 42.3% | $118.7M 51.4% | $158.2M 46.5% | $137.8M 42.7% | $128.8M 40.7% | $261.4M 67.6% | $380.3M 58.0% | $140.3M 46.9% | $60.7M 50.4% |
| Gross Profit | $131.5M 57.7% | $112.3M 48.6% | $182.0M 53.5% | $184.6M 57.3% | $187.9M 59.3% | $125.4M 32.4% | $275.3M 42.0% | $158.8M 53.1% | $59.8M 49.6% |
| Research & Development | $12.7M 5.6% | $14.4M 6.2% | $41.7M 12.3% | $55.0M 17.1% | $47.5M 15.0% | $38.2M 9.9% | $35.8M 5.5% | $22.1M 7.4% | $6.4M 5.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $42.4M 18.6% | $93.1M 40.3% | $107.0M 31.5% | $52.1M 16.1% | $90.6M 28.6% | $212.4M 54.9% | $131.1M 20.0% | $24.1M 8.1% | $10.0M 8.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $121.5M 53.3% | $190.1M 82.3% | $276.2M 81.2% | $229.2M 71.1% | $282.0M 89.0% | $392.7M 101.5% | $298.2M 45.5% | $113.2M 37.8% | $48.7M 40.4% |
| Operating Income | $10.0M 4.4% | -$77.8M -33.7% | -$94.2M -27.7% | -$44.5M -13.8% | -$94.1M -29.7% | -$267.3M -69.1% | -$22.9M -3.5% | $45.6M 15.2% | $11.0M 9.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $676K 0.3% | $1.6M 0.7% | $7.7M 2.3% | $8.1M 2.5% | $3.3M 1.0% | $3.3M 0.8% | $783K 0.1% | -$66K -0.0% | $996K 0.8% |
| Pretax Income | $11.4M 5.0% | -$140.7M -60.9% | -$89.3M -26.2% | $23.0M 7.1% | -$90.5M -28.6% | -$275.6M -71.3% | -$6.0M -0.9% | $55.3M 18.5% | $11.8M 9.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $21K 0.0% | $64K 0.0% | -$42K -0.0% | $361K 0.1% | $102K 0.0% | $3.8M 1.0% | $19.9M 3.0% | $14.8M 5.0% | $3.9M 3.2% |
| Net Income | $11.4M 5.0% | -$140.8M -60.9% | -$89.2M -26.2% | $22.6M 7.0% | -$90.6M -28.6% | -$279.3M -72.2% | -$25.9M -4.0% | $40.5M 13.5% | $7.9M 6.6% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.01 | $-0.13 | $-0.09 | $0.02 | $-0.09 | $-0.28 | $-2.31 | $-0.28 | $0.01 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.13 | $-0.09 | $0.02 | $-0.09 | $-0.28 | $-2.31 | $-0.28 | $0.01 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 1.06B | 1.05B | 1.04B | 1.03B | 1.03B | 1.02B | 368.2M | 292.7M | 272.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 1.06B | 1.05B | 1.04B | 1.03B | 1.03B | 1.02B | 368.2M | 292.7M | 313.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $19M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 83.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 46.9 | 58.0 | 67.6 | 40.7 | 42.7 | 46.5 | 51.4 | 42.3 |
| Gross Profit | 53.1 | 42.0 | 32.4 | 59.3 | 57.3 | 53.5 | 48.6 | 57.7 |
| R&D | 7.4 | 5.5 | 9.9 | 15.0 | 17.1 | 12.3 | 6.2 | 5.6 |
| SG&A | 8.1 | 20.0 | 54.9 | 28.6 | 16.1 | 31.5 | 40.3 | 18.6 |
| Operating Income | 15.2 | -3.5 | -69.1 | -29.7 | -13.8 | -27.7 | -33.7 | 4.4 |
| Income Tax | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | 13.5 | -4.0 | -72.2 | -28.6 | 7.0 | -26.2 | -60.9 | 5.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KRKR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| KRKR | $6M | 271.8× | -8.1× | 0.0× | -1.4% | 57.7% | 5.0% | 8.9% | 8.9% | — | 3 |
Peers = companies sharing KRKR's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.