Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.31% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $49.16 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.0%/yr for a decade (off $44M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.0% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$25M
mean 136.8% · volatility σ 244% · implied rate exceeded in 2/4 yrs
Central path = implied 9.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (244%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (109%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $36M dividends + $3M buybacks = $39M returned on $33M FCF.
4 consecutive years of dividend increases · 114%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 19%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $38M covers all $37M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2021-12-31 (10-K/A).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~15.9% on $13M of debt.
Cash of $38M fully covers short-term debt of $13M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 5-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 5-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 69.8 | 70.4 | 68.8 | 62.3 | 61.1 | 63.2 |
| Gross Profit | 30.2 | 29.6 | 31.2 | 37.7 | 38.9 | 36.8 |
| SG&A | 13.3 | 14.4 | 15.7 | 16.5 | 16.9 | 16.5 |
| Operating Income | 9.4 | 6.4 | 7.1 | 10.4 | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Income Tax | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| Net Income | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 8.0 | 7.1 | 6.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on KRT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $467.7M 100.0% | $422.6M 100.0% | $405.7M 100.0% | $423.0M 100.0% | $364.2M 100.0% | $295.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $295.6M 63.2% | $258.3M 61.1% | $252.6M 62.3% | $290.9M 68.8% | $256.4M 70.4% | $206.4M 69.8% |
| Gross Profit | $172.1M 36.8% | $164.3M 38.9% | $153.0M 37.7% | $132.1M 31.2% | $107.8M 29.6% | $89.1M 30.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $77.4M 16.5% | $71.5M 16.9% | $67.0M 16.5% | $66.3M 15.7% | $52.4M 14.4% | $39.2M 13.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $130.7M 27.9% | $126.6M 29.9% | $111.0M 27.4% | $102.1M 24.1% | $84.7M 23.2% | $61.4M 20.8% |
| Operating Income | $41.4M 8.9% | $37.8M 8.9% | $42.1M 10.4% | $30.0M 7.1% | $23.1M 6.4% | $27.7M 9.4% |
| Interest Expense | $2.1M 0.4% | $2.1M 0.5% | $2.0M 0.5% | $2.0M 0.5% | $2.9M 0.8% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.2M 0.5% | $2.3M 0.5% | $1.8M 0.4% | $2.2M 0.5% | $1.5M 0.4% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.6M 0.3% | $2.9M 0.7% | $908K 0.2% | $2.5M 0.6% | $4.4M 1.2% | -$5.8M -2.0% |
| Pretax Income | $43.0M 9.2% | $40.7M 9.6% | $43.0M 10.6% | $32.5M 7.7% | $27.5M 7.6% | $21.9M 7.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $10.4M 2.2% | $9.9M 2.3% | $9.8M 2.4% | $6.7M 1.6% | $5.1M 1.4% | $5.3M 1.8% |
| Net Income | $31.5M 6.7% | $30.0M 7.1% | $32.5M 8.0% | $23.6M 5.6% | $20.8M 5.7% | $17.5M 5.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.57 | $1.50 | $1.63 | $1.19 | $1.13 | $1.15 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.56 | $1.49 | $1.63 | $1.19 | $1.12 | $1.13 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 20.1M | 20.0M | 19.9M | 19.8M | 18.4M | 15.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 20.2M | 20.1M | 20.0M | 19.9M | 18.6M | 15.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 490 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.73T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.35T | 332.4× | 142.6× | 14.2× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| TM | $625.8B | 61.2× | 25.2× | 2.7× | 3.8% | 18.4% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 5.9% | 1.7× | 665 |
| PDD | $452.0B | 33.6× | 32.6× | 7.3× | 14.5% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $309.6B | 21.9× | 14.7× | 1.9× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 110% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| BABA | $203.0B | 136.5× | — | 1.4× | 8.1% | 39.8% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | — | 1,298 |
| TJX | $139.5B | 25.9× | — | 2.3× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 42.1% | — | 2,608 |
| HTHT | $132.4B | 187.5× | 114.1× | — | — | — | — | 39.7% | 27.3% | 0.7× | 258 |
| SBUX | $112.6B | 60.8× | 27.3× | 3.0× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 23.3% | 3.4× | 2,252 |
| LOW | $111.2B | 16.7× | 12.2× | 1.3× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| ABNB | $104.6B | — | 39.1× | 8.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 24.6% | 0.8× | 1,246 |
| MELI | $96.3B | 48.2× | — | 3.3× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $90.5B | 35.8× | 21.0× | 3.5× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $89.4B | 174.3× | 94.2× | 12.7× | 48.9% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | — | 9 |
| GM | $78.8B | 26.6× | 3.9× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — | 1,447 |
| ROST | $74.1B | 34.8× | 22.1× | 3.3× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 27.8% | 0.5× | 1,276 |
| ORLY | $73.4B | 29.4× | 19.9× | 4.1× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $71.6B | 50.8× | 24.6× | 6.0× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RCL | $69.2B | 16.4× | — | 3.9× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 32.3% | — | 1,114 |
| SE | $66.6B | 43.1× | 26.5× | 2.9× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| F | $55.1B | — | 4.7× | 0.3× | 1.2% | 6.8% | -4.4% | -22.7% | -22.7% | — | — |
| NKE | $55.0B | 17.6× | — | 1.2× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 13.6% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $49.8B | 20.5× | 13.8× | 2.6× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| CMG | $49.5B | 32.5× | 21.4× | 4.2× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| EBAY | $48.9B | 25.1× | 17.7× | 4.4× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| KRT | $981M | 31.5× | 18.3× | 2.1× | 10.7% | 36.8% | 6.7% | 21.1% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 126 |
Peers = companies sharing KRT's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.