Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 324 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 22%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~14.6% on $73M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| LAUR | $5.4B | 20.1× | 10.6× | 3.2× | 8.6% | 28.3% | 16.5% | 23.7% | 22.3% | 0.1× | 324 |
Peers = companies sharing LAUR's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.70B 100.0% | $1.57B 100.0% | $1.48B 100.0% | $1.24B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $1.02B 100.0% | $1.21B 100.0% | $1.14B 100.0% | $3.33B 100.0% | $3.30B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.22B 71.7% | $1.15B 73.2% | $1.09B 73.4% | $907.4M 73.0% | $814.5M 75.0% | $802.5M 78.3% | $949.5M 78.3% | $904.0M 79.0% | $2.78B 83.3% | $2.79B 84.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $51.1M 3.0% | $45.8M 2.9% | $52.6M 3.5% | $64.8M 5.2% | $204.4M 18.8% | $199.8M 19.5% | $226.3M 18.7% | $267.4M 23.4% | $315.5M 9.5% | $222.5M 6.7% |
| Operating Income | $431.1M 25.3% | $374.0M 23.9% | $338.8M 22.8% | $270.0M 21.7% | -$4.6M -0.4% | -$329.3M -32.1% | $36.0M 3.0% | -$26.8M -2.3% | $235.2M 7.1% | $290.7M 8.8% |
| Interest Expense | $10.7M 0.6% | $18.1M 1.2% | $21.0M 1.4% | $16.4M 1.3% | $46.3M 4.3% | $100.9M 9.8% | $125.0M 10.3% | $188.4M 16.5% | $334.9M 10.0% | $390.4M 11.8% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $7.9M 0.5% | $1.2M 0.1% | -$325K -0.0% | $770K 0.1% | -$1.7M -0.2% | -$2.4M -0.2% | $8.9M 0.7% | $10.6M 0.9% | -$1.9M -0.1% | $457K 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $400.9M 23.6% | $414.5M 26.5% | $254.5M 17.1% | $245.9M 19.8% | -$137.5M -12.7% | -$450.8M -44.0% | -$119.7M -9.9% | -$120.1M -10.5% | -$76.8M -2.3% | $367.1M 11.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $117.3M 6.9% | $119.0M 7.6% | $137.6M 9.3% | $185.4M 14.9% | $145.6M 13.4% | -$130.1M -12.7% | $31.0M 2.6% | $71.2M 6.2% | -$93.0M -2.8% | $34.4M 1.0% |
| Net Income | $281.6M 16.5% | $296.5M 18.9% | $107.6M 7.2% | $69.6M 5.6% | $192.4M 17.7% | -$613.3M -59.8% | $938.5M 77.4% | $370.1M 32.3% | $91.5M 2.7% | $371.8M 11.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.91 | $1.93 | $0.69 | $0.42 | $1.01 | $-2.93 | $4.23 | $1.79 | $-1.20 | $2.78 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.89 | $1.92 | $0.68 | $0.41 | $1.01 | $-2.93 | $4.23 | $1.73 | $-1.20 | $2.76 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 147.8M | 153.3M | 157.3M | 167.7M | 189.7M | 209.7M | 221.9M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 148.7M | 153.9M | 157.9M | 168.3M | 189.7M | 209.7M | 221.9M | 212.8M | 172.4M | 134.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $215M buybacks = $215M returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 88th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 79.0 | 78.3 | 78.3 | 75.0 | 73.0 | 73.4 | 73.2 | 71.7 |
| SG&A | 23.4 | 18.7 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
| Operating Income | -2.3 | 3.0 | -32.1 | -0.4 | 21.7 | 22.8 | 23.9 | 25.3 |
| Income Tax | 6.2 | 2.6 | -12.7 | 13.4 | 14.9 | 9.3 | 7.6 | 6.9 |
| Net Income | 32.3 | 77.4 | -59.8 | 17.7 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 18.9 | 16.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LAUR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.