Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 267 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $24.75 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 12.0%/yr for a decade (off $367M normalized FCF).
The market's 12.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.40B shares · net debt $281M
mean 57.0% · volatility σ 173% · implied rate exceeded in 4/8 yrs
Central path = implied 12.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (173%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| LEVI | $9.8B | 17.1× | 11.4× | 1.6× | 4.1% | 61.7% | 9.2% | 25.4% | 17.4% | 1.2× | 267 |
Peers = companies sharing LEVI's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 69% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $213M dividends + $31M buybacks = $243M returned on $308M FCF.
5 consecutive years of dividend increases · -11%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 17%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $758M covers the $0 due within a year 757900000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-11-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.7% on $1.0B of debt.
Cash of $758M fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 38.1× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 46.2 | 46.2 | 47.2 | 41.9 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 39.4 | 38.3 |
| Gross Profit | 53.8 | 53.8 | 52.8 | 58.1 | 57.5 | 57.5 | 60.6 | 61.7 |
| SG&A | 44.1 | 44.0 | 52.7 | 46.2 | 46.7 | 49.6 | 51.3 | 50.5 |
| Operating Income | 9.7 | 9.8 | -1.9 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 6.1 | 4.4 | 10.8 |
| Income Tax | 3.9 | 1.4 | -1.4 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | 5.1 | 6.8 | -2.9 | 9.6 | 9.2 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 9.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LEVI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.28B 100.0% | $6.03B 100.0% | $5.84B 100.0% | $6.17B 100.0% | $5.76B 100.0% | $4.45B 100.0% | $5.76B 100.0% | $5.58B 100.0% | $4.90B 100.0% | $4.55B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.40B 38.3% | $2.37B 39.4% | $2.48B 42.5% | $2.62B 42.5% | $2.42B 41.9% | $2.10B 47.2% | $2.66B 46.2% | $2.58B 46.2% | $2.34B 47.7% | $2.22B 48.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.58B 46.2% | $2.34B 47.7% | $2.22B 48.8% |
| Gross Profit | $3.88B 61.7% | $3.66B 60.6% | $3.36B 57.5% | $3.55B 57.5% | $3.35B 58.1% | $2.35B 52.8% | $3.10B 53.8% | $3.00B 53.8% | $2.56B 52.3% | $2.33B 51.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.17B 50.5% | $3.09B 51.3% | $2.90B 49.6% | $2.88B 46.7% | $2.66B 46.2% | $2.35B 52.7% | $2.53B 44.0% | $2.46B 44.1% | $2.08B 42.5% | $1.87B 41.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | $407.6M 7.1% | $496.6M 11.2% | $397.7M 6.9% | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | $677.6M 10.8% | $262.7M 4.4% | $354.4M 6.1% | $646.5M 10.5% | $686.2M 11.9% | -$85.1M -1.9% | $566.7M 9.8% | $540.4M 9.7% | $480.1M 9.8% | $462.2M 10.2% |
| Interest Expense | $48.6M 0.8% | $41.8M 0.7% | $45.9M 0.8% | $25.7M 0.4% | $72.9M 1.3% | $82.2M 1.8% | $66.2M 1.1% | $55.3M 1.0% | $68.6M 1.4% | $73.2M 1.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.0M 0.1% | -$3.3M -0.1% | -$42.2M -0.7% | $28.8M 0.5% | $3.4M 0.1% | -$22.4M -0.5% | $2.0M 0.0% | $14.9M 0.3% | -$39.9M -0.8% | $18.2M 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $634.0M 10.1% | $217.6M 3.6% | $266.3M 4.6% | $649.6M 10.5% | $580.2M 10.1% | -$189.7M -4.3% | $477.6M 8.3% | $500.0M 9.0% | $348.8M 7.1% | $407.3M 8.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $132.0M 2.1% | $7.2M 0.1% | $15.7M 0.3% | $80.5M 1.3% | $26.7M 0.5% | -$62.6M -1.4% | $82.6M 1.4% | $214.8M 3.9% | $64.2M 1.3% | $116.1M 2.5% |
| Net Income | $578.1M 9.2% | $210.6M 3.5% | $249.6M 4.3% | $569.1M 9.2% | $553.5M 9.6% | -$127.1M -2.9% | $394.6M 6.8% | $283.1M 5.1% | $281.4M 5.7% | $291.1M 6.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.46 | $0.53 | $0.63 | $1.43 | $1.38 | $-0.32 | $1.01 | $0.75 | $0.75 | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.45 | $0.52 | $0.62 | $1.41 | $1.35 | $-0.32 | $0.97 | $0.73 | $0.73 | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 395.5M | 398.2M | 397.2M | 397.3M | 401.6M | 397.3M | 389.1M | 377.1M | 376.2M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 399.7M | 402.4M | 401.7M | 403.8M | 409.8M | 397.3M | 408.4M | 388.6M | 384.3M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.