Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $194.1M 100.0% | $154.8M 100.0% | $152.5M 100.0% | $119.0M 100.0% | $92.9M 100.0% | $37.3M 100.0% | $12.5M 100.0% | $8.3M 100.0% | $3.7M 100.0% | $5.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $27.7M 14.3% | $21.4M 13.8% | $18.9M 12.4% | $18.7M 15.7% | $18.0M 19.4% | $8.9M 23.8% | $2.5M 20.3% | $2.0M 24.0% | $1.0M 27.6% | $1.9M 37.1% |
| Gross Profit | $166.3M 85.7% | $133.4M 86.2% | $133.6M 87.6% | $100.4M 84.3% | $74.9M 80.6% | $28.4M 76.2% | $9.9M 79.7% | $6.3M 76.0% | $2.7M 72.4% | $3.3M 62.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $57.9M 29.9% | $57.9M 37.4% | $51.7M 33.9% | $47.0M 39.5% | $39.5M 42.6% | $45.0M 120.6% | $2.4M 19.2% | $2.3M 27.5% | $742K 20.2% | $1.0M 19.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $174.0M 89.7% | $153.8M 99.3% | $148.1M 97.1% | $143.8M 120.8% | $129.2M 139.1% | $86.3M 231.3% | $12.8M 102.9% | $8.4M 100.7% | $3.9M 105.7% | $4.5M 85.3% |
| Operating Income | -$7.7M -4.0% | -$20.4M -13.2% | -$14.5M -9.5% | -$43.4M -36.5% | -$54.3M -58.5% | -$57.8M -155.0% | -$2.9M -23.2% | -$2.1M -24.7% | -$1.2M -33.4% | -$1.2M -22.4% |
| Interest Expense | $1.4M 0.7% | $2.2M 1.4% | $2.6M 1.7% | $1.3M 1.1% | $3.0M 3.3% | $1.7M 4.5% | $761K 6.1% | $354K 4.3% | $101K 2.7% | $49K 0.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | — | — | — | — | -$2.6M -6.9% | -$761K -6.1% | — | -$1.2M -33.1% | -$1.2M -23.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$10.2M -5.2% | -$22.6M -14.6% | -$17.4M -11.4% | -$44.7M -37.5% | -$61.3M -66.0% | -$60.4M -162.0% | -$3.7M -29.3% | -$2.4M -29.0% | -$1.4M -37.5% | -$1.2M -23.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $46K 0.0% | $598K 0.4% | $428K 0.3% | $361K 0.3% | $8K 0.0% | $123K 0.3% | -$123K -1.0% | -$125K -1.5% | — | — |
| Net Income | -$11.2M -5.8% | $24.5M 15.8% | $17.8M 11.7% | -$45.5M -38.3% | -$60.9M -65.6% | -$58.6M -157.3% | -$3.1M -25.2% | -$1.2M -14.9% | -$1.2M -32.8% | -$1.1M -21.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.25 | $-0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.03 | $-0.03 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.25 | $-0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $-0.03 | $-0.03 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 45.1M | 41.2M | 33.9M | 31.0M | 27.0M | 14.3M | 9.9M | 44.2M | 41.7M | 33.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 45.1M | 41.2M | 33.9M | 31.0M | 27.0M | 14.3M | 9.9M | 44.2M | 41.7M | 33.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 48% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $3M dividends + $270000 buybacks = $3M returned on $6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -49%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Loading top holders...
No trend data available for this metric.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 24.0 | 20.3 | 23.8 | 19.4 | 15.7 | 12.4 | 13.8 | 14.3 |
| Gross Profit | 76.0 | 79.7 | 76.2 | 80.6 | 84.3 | 87.6 | 86.2 | 85.7 |
| SG&A | 27.5 | 19.2 | 120.6 | 42.6 | 39.5 | 33.9 | 37.4 | 29.9 |
| Operating Income | -24.7 | -23.2 | -155.0 | -58.5 | -36.5 | -9.5 | -13.2 | -4.0 |
| Income Tax | -1.5 | -1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -14.9 | -25.2 | -157.3 | -65.6 | -38.3 | 11.7 | 15.8 | -5.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LFMD: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.