Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow on any basis, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 36 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $3.42T | 25.7× | 22.9× | 8.5× | 15.1% | 59.7% | 32.8% | 31.8% | 28.5% | 0.1× | 1,956 |
| META | $1.57T | 26.2× | 15.7× | 7.8× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.2× | 1,887 |
| APP | $76.8B | 23.4× | 17.9× | 14.0× | 70.0% | 87.9% | 60.8% | 156% | 59.0% | 0.2× | 327 |
| NBIS | $41.9B | 467.1× | — | 79.1× | 479% | 68.6% | 15.6% | 1.8% | 0.9% | — | — |
| ZM | $27.9B | 15.4× | 21.2× | 5.7× | 4.4% | 77.0% | 39.0% | 19.4% | 19.4% | -1.0× | 232 |
| BIDU | $26.0B | — | 110.5× | 1.4× | 1.2% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 13.0× | — |
| FLUT | $14.3B | — | 15.9× | 0.9× | 16.6% | 45.2% | -2.5% | -4.5% | -1.9% | 6.7× | — |
| FDS | $11.6B | 22.6× | 14.5× | 4.7× | 6.7% | 50.6% | 21.5% | 26.6% | 15.8% | 1.3× | 212 |
| PINS | $11.1B | 31.7× | 29.4× | 2.6× | 15.8% | 80.1% | 9.9% | 8.8% | 8.8% | -2.8× | 171 |
| DOCN | $10.5B | 35.6× | 39.3× | 11.7× | 15.5% | 59.9% | 28.8% | -904% | 20.5% | 3.5× | 112 |
| MTCH | $9.7B | 17.4× | 13.4× | 2.8× | 0.2% | 72.8% | 17.6% | -242% | 16.5% | 3.1× | 146 |
| SNAP | $9.0B | — | — | 1.5× | 10.6% | 55.0% | -7.8% | -20.2% | -7.9% | — | 120 |
| BZ | $7.2B | 39.4× | 15.6× | 6.1× | 17.3% | 85.1% | 33.1% | 13.7% | 13.7% | -1.4× | 42 |
| NIQ | $5.8B | — | 12.4× | 1.4× | 5.7% | — | -8.4% | -35.7% | -7.7% | 4.3× | 35 |
| TTD | $5.8B | 13.7× | 7.3× | 2.0× | 18.5% | 78.6% | 15.3% | 17.8% | 17.8% | -0.9× | 154 |
| WIX | $3.2B | 87.6× | 111.0× | 1.6× | 13.2% | 68.1% | 2.5% | -13.8% | -13.8% | -11.9× | 24 |
| MGNI | $3.1B | 22.6× | 20.4× | 4.3× | 6.9% | 62.7% | 20.3% | 15.7% | 9.8% | 0.0× | 60 |
| PPLI | $2.7B | — | — | 1.1× | -8.7% | 66.2% | -4.3% | -2.2% | -1.7% | — | — |
| GRND | $2.2B | 29.4× | 18.6× | 5.0× | 27.6% | — | 21.5% | 202% | 21.4% | 2.3× | 25 |
| RUM | $2.1B | — | — | 21.1× | 5.4% | -6.7% | -81.3% | -29.8% | -29.8% | — | 54 |
| DV | $2.1B | 45.2× | 13.7× | 2.8× | 13.9% | 82.2% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 4.5% | -1.9× | 61 |
| WB | $1.5B | 3.6× | 2.6× | 0.9× | 0.1% | 76.0% | 25.6% | 11.5% | 7.5% | -0.4× | 13 |
| TRIP | $1.1B | 29.7× | — | 0.6× | 3.1% | 92.3% | 2.1% | 6.2% | 2.2% | — | 56 |
| HSTM | $1.0B | 55.3× | 15.6× | 3.4× | 4.3% | — | 6.0% | 5.2% | 5.2% | -0.6× | 38 |
| TBLA | $936M | 26.6× | 12.5× | 0.5× | 8.3% | 29.8% | 2.2% | 4.7% | 4.2% | -0.3× | — |
| LGCL | $2M | — | 2.3× | 0.0× | 2.3% | 33.8% | 0.9% | 3.1% | 2.4% | 2.0× | — |
Peers = companies sharing LGCL's sector (Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc.) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$6.8M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $149.0M 100.0% | $1.06B 100.0% | $1.47B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $98.7M 66.2% | $706.0M 66.4% | $1.06B 71.6% |
| Gross Profit | $50.3M 33.8% | $357.4M 33.6% | $418.6M 28.4% |
| Research & Development | $25.1M 16.8% | $168.6M 15.9% | $157.5M 10.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $13.0M 8.7% | $86.3M 8.1% | $108.4M 7.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $47.5M 31.9% | $329.4M 31.0% | $350.8M 23.8% |
| Operating Income | $2.8M 1.9% | $28.0M 2.6% | $67.7M 4.6% |
| Interest Expense | $2.7M 1.8% | $1.8M 0.2% | $919K 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.0M -0.7% | $1.9M 0.2% | $2.6M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $1.8M 1.2% | $29.9M 2.8% | $70.3M 4.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $379K 0.3% | -$10.2M -1.0% | -$7.9M -0.5% |
| Net Income | $1.4M 0.9% | $39.8M 3.7% | $77.7M 5.3% |
| Per Share | |||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.06 | $20.07 | $39.80 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.06 | $20.07 | $39.80 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 2.4M | 2.0M | 2.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 2.4M | 2.0M | 2.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 3% against ROIC 2% — 1% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 71.6 | 66.4 | 66.2 |
| Gross Profit | 28.4 | 33.6 | 33.8 |
| R&D | 10.7 | 15.9 | 16.8 |
| SG&A | 7.4 | 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Operating Income | 4.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Income Tax | -0.5 | -1.0 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | 5.3 | 3.7 | 0.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LGCL: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~19.8% on $13.6M of debt.
Cash of $4.3M is below short-term debt of $13.6M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Earns -13.78pts against its cost of capital — capital is being consumed, not created.
| Period | ROIC | Cost of capital | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | 29.1% | 15.8% | 13.2pts |
| FY2024 | 8.7% | 18.6% | -9.9pts |
| FY2025 | 5.0% | 18.8% | -13.8pts |
| Now | 2.4% | 18.7% | -16.3pts |
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | 28.4% | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| FY2024 | 33.6% | 2.6% | 3.7% |
| FY2025 | 33.8% | 1.9% | 0.9% |
Return on equity (3%) and return on invested capital (2%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
Margins have compressed 2 years running even as the spread stayed positive.
Free cash flow has fallen short of reported profit in 3 of the last three years.
Only 3 profitable years available, so the average is shorter than the five the threshold assumes.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: share_based_compensation.
Stressed coverage falls to 0.7x — below the level at which interest is reliably covered.
| EBITDA decline | Interest coverage |
|---|---|
| 0% | 1.05x |
| 5% | 1.00x |
| 10% | 0.94x |
| 15% | 0.89x |
| 20% | 0.84x |
| 25% | 0.79x |
| 30% | 0.73x |
| 35% | 0.68x |
| 40% | 0.63x |
| 45% | 0.58x |
| 50% | 0.52x |
| 55% | 0.47x |
| 60% | 0.42x |
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Free cash flow is negative, so debt service depends on the cash balance rather than on the business.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $1M | $1M |
| Share-based comp | not reported | not reported |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $4M | $5M |
| Operating cash flow | $5M | $5M |
| Capex | −$12M | −$7M |
| Free cash flow | −$7M | −$7M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | -29.8% | 111.0% | 140.8 points |
| FY2025 | 2.3% | -47.5% | -49.8 points |
| Fiscal year | DSO | DIO | DPO | Cash conversion cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | 7 days | not reported | 12.2 days | -5.2 days |
| FY2024 | 21 days | not reported | 24.2 days | -3.2 days |
| FY2025 | 10.8 days | not reported | 18.8 days | -8 days |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2023 | 39.1 percent |
| FY2024 | 4.9 percent |
| FY2025 | -5.7 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.