Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.00% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -253%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~2.4% on $715000 of debt.
Cash of $24M fully covers short-term debt of $715000.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $3.17 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 31.0%/yr for a decade (off $6M normalized FCF).
The market's 31.0% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.22B shares · net debt -$23M
mean 811.2% · volatility σ 1641% · implied rate exceeded in 1/3 yrs
Central path = implied 31.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1641%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $724000 buybacks = $724000 returned on $6M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $224.3M 100.0% | $255.3M 100.0% | $629.4M 100.0% | $503.6M 100.0% | $446.1M 100.0% | $398.2M 100.0% | $243.6M 100.0% | $227.5M 100.0% | $319.9M 100.0% | $292.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $78.4M 35.0% | $101.8M 39.9% | $269.5M 42.8% | $228.5M 45.4% | $239.4M 53.7% | $222.0M 55.8% | $146.0M 59.9% | $166.3M 73.1% | $214.3M 67.0% | $188.9M 64.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $189.8M 59.3% | $160.6M 54.9% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $28.4M 9.7% |
| Gross Profit | $145.9M 65.0% | $153.5M 60.1% | $359.9M 57.2% | $275.1M 54.6% | $206.7M 46.3% | $176.2M 44.2% | $97.6M 40.1% | $61.2M 26.9% | $105.6M 33.0% | $103.5M 35.4% |
| Research & Development | $10.3M 4.6% | $15.5M 6.1% | $19.1M 3.0% | $19.4M 3.9% | $20.3M 4.6% | $15.2M 3.8% | $17.9M 7.3% | $5.7M 2.5% | $5.2M 1.6% | $6.7M 2.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $19.6M 8.7% | $25.7M 10.1% | $34.1M 5.4% | $36.3M 7.2% | $39.7M 8.9% | $33.2M 8.3% | $37.8M 15.5% | $33.0M 14.5% | $29.6M 9.3% | $34.5M 11.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $137.9M 61.5% | $155.7M 61.0% | $370.3M 58.8% | $289.3M 57.5% | $222.8M 49.9% | $172.3M 43.3% | $113.6M 46.6% | $98.7M 43.4% | $115.8M 36.2% | $112.6M 38.5% |
| Operating Income | $8.0M 3.6% | -$2.2M -0.9% | -$10.4M -1.7% | -$14.2M -2.8% | -$16.1M -3.6% | $3.9M 1.0% | -$16.1M -6.6% | -$37.5M -16.5% | -$10.2M -3.2% | -$9.1M -3.1% |
| Interest Expense | $17K 0.0% | — | $4K 0.0% | $5K 0.0% | $13K 0.0% | $92K 0.0% | $66K 0.0% | $5K 0.0% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | $0 0.0% | $71K 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $103K 0.0% | $297K 0.1% | $487K 0.2% | $581K 0.2% | $518K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $252K 0.1% | -$310K -0.1% | $845K 0.1% | -$55.0M -10.9% | $39.4M 8.8% | $12.9M 3.2% | $15.1M 6.2% | -$22.3M -9.8% | $492K 0.2% | $398K 0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $8.2M 3.7% | -$2.5M -1.0% | -$9.6M -1.5% | -$69.3M -13.8% | $23.3M 5.2% | $16.8M 4.2% | -$947K -0.4% | -$59.8M -26.3% | -$9.7M -3.0% | -$8.7M -3.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$61K -0.0% | -$39K -0.0% | $40K 0.0% | -$12.7M -2.5% | $9.8M 2.2% | $3.4M 0.9% | $113K 0.0% | $33K 0.0% | $81K 0.0% | $54K 0.0% |
| Net Income | $8.3M 3.7% | -$2.5M -1.0% | -$9.6M -1.5% | -$56.6M -11.2% | $13.1M 2.9% | $13.3M 3.3% | $999K 0.4% | -$59.6M -26.2% | -$9.5M -3.0% | -$8.7M -3.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.04 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | $-0.25 | $0.06 | $0.06 | $0.01 | $-0.44 | $-0.07 | $-0.07 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.04 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | $-0.25 | $0.06 | $0.06 | $-0.06 | $-0.44 | $-0.07 | $-0.07 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 219.4M | 221.1M | 225.9M | 226.2M | 224.3M | 220.4M | 137.6M | 134.5M | 137.6M | 127.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 219.6M | 221.1M | 225.9M | 226.2M | 226.6M | 225.9M | 223.5M | 134.5M | 137.6M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 7 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| LITB | $688M | 79.3× | 74.7× | 3.1× | -12.1% | 65.0% | 3.7% | -208% | -253% | 0.1× | 7 |
Peers = companies sharing LITB's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 28th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 37.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 73.1 | 59.9 | 55.8 | 53.7 | 45.4 | 42.8 | 39.9 | 35.0 |
| Gross Profit | 26.9 | 40.1 | 44.2 | 46.3 | 54.6 | 57.2 | 60.1 | 65.0 |
| R&D | 2.5 | 7.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 4.6 |
| SG&A | 14.5 | 15.5 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 10.1 | 8.7 |
| Operating Income | -16.5 | -6.6 | 1.0 | -3.6 | -2.8 | -1.7 | -0.9 | 3.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.2 | -2.5 | 0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 |
| Net Income | -26.2 | 0.4 | 3.3 | 2.9 | -11.2 | -1.5 | -1.0 | 3.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LITB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.