Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-26 | 2 co-filers General Counsel | 10b5-1 plan sale | 4,514 | $35.26 | $159k |
| 2026-10-26 | 2 co-filers General Counsel | 10b5-1 plan sale | 486 | $35.77 | $17k |
| 2026-09-10 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $38.75 | $387k |
| 2026-09-09 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
| 10b5-1 plan saleindirect |
| 10,000 |
| $38.63 |
| $386k |
| 2026-09-03 | Williams William L. Iii Director | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 6,590 | $40.09 | $264k |
| 2026-09-03 | Bradford Tonya Williams Director | Open-market sale | 1,600 | $39.89 | $64k |
| 2026-09-03 | Mahan James S Iii Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $39.75 | $397k |
| 2026-09-02 | Williams William L. Iii Director | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 1,810 | $40.00 | $72k |
| 2026-09-02 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 9,742 | $39.53 | $385k |
| 2026-09-02 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 258 | $39.88 | $10k |
| 2026-08-27 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $39.66 | $397k |
| 2026-08-26 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $39.99 | $400k |
| 2026-08-25 | 3 co-filers President | Option exercise | 50,000 | — | — |
| 2026-08-25 | 3 co-filers President | Tax withholding | 22,221 | $39.99 | $889k |
| 2026-08-25 | 3 co-filers President | Option exercise | 50,000 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-20 | 3 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $40.53 | $405k |
| 2026-08-19 | 3 co-filers Chief Credit Officer | Option exercise | 2,420 | — | — |
| 2026-08-19 | 3 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 8,002 | $41.05 | $328k |
| 2026-08-19 | 3 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 1,998 | $41.97 | $84k |
| 2026-08-19 | 3 co-filers Chief Credit Officer | Tax withholding | 1,076 | $40.89 | $44k |
| 2026-08-19 | 3 co-filers Chief Credit Officer | Option exercise | 2,420 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-18 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Option exercise | 2,916 | — | — |
| 2026-08-18 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Tax withholding | 1,296 | $42.60 | $55k |
| 2026-08-18 | 3 co-filers Chief Financial Officer | Option exercise | 2,916 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-17 | Diffley Matthew S Chief Accounting Officer | Grant | 4,620 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-13 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $43.10 | $431k |
| 2026-08-12 | 2 co-filers Chief Executive Officer | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 10,000 | $42.75 | $427k |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers Chief Info./Digital Off., Bank | Option exercise | 25,000 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers President | Option exercise | 42,000 | — | — |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers Chief Info./Digital Off., Bank | Tax withholding | 11,111 | $42.23 | $469k |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers President | Tax withholding | 18,665 | $42.23 | $788k |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers Chief Info./Digital Off., Bank | Option exercise | 25,000 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-10 | 3 co-filers President | Option exercise | 42,000 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-04 | Spencer Courtney Chief Experience Officer | Open-market saleindirect | 154 | $43.68 | $7k |
| 2026-08-04 | Lucht David G Director | Open-market sale | 2,000 | $44.36 | $89k |
| 2026-08-03 | Williams William L. Iii Director | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 8,400 | $43.08 | $362k |
| 2026-07-28 | Moroz Mark Michael Chief Banking Officer | Open-market sale | 6,100 | $42.08 | $257k |
| 2026-07-27 | Lucht David G Director | Open-market sale | 3,000 | $42.13 | $126k |
| 2026-07-01 | 2 co-filers Group filing | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 2,604 | $41.23 | $107k |
| 2026-07-01 | 2 co-filers Group filing | 10b5-1 plan saleindirect | 5,796 | $41.78 | $242k |
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 4% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $5.5M dividends + $0 buybacks = $5.5M returned on $143.5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 27th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 8% against ROIC 8% — 1% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LOB: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~1468.6% on $23.4M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Expense | — | — | $343.0M | $117.0M | $64.4M | $93.7M | $87.9M | $54.6M | $25.4M | $14.6M |
| Pretax Income | $142.8M | $89.2M | $82.8M | $210.3M | $210.8M | $47.4M | $23.5M | $46.0M | $98.3M | $17.2M |
| Income Tax Expense | $37.2M | $11.8M | $8.9M | $34.1M | $43.8M | -$12.2M | $5.4M | -$5.4M | -$2.2M | $3.4M |
| Net Income | $105.9M | $77.5M | $73.9M | $176.2M | $167.0M | $59.5M | $18.0M | $51.4M | $100.5M | $13.8M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.25 | $1.72 | $1.67 | $4.02 | $3.87 | $1.46 | $0.45 | $1.28 | $2.75 | $0.40 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.23 | $1.69 | $1.64 | $3.92 | $3.71 | $1.43 | $0.44 | $1.24 | $2.65 | $0.39 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 45.7M | 45.0M | 44.4M | 43.9M | 43.2M | 40.7M | 40.2M | 40.1M | 36.6M | 34.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 46.0M | 45.8M | 45.1M | 44.9M | 45.1M | 41.8M | 41.1M | 41.4M | 37.9M | 35.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 19 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STT | $46.2B | 18.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.3% | — | 21.1% | 10.6% | 10.6% | — | 388 |
| NTRS | $30.9B | 19.4× | — | 3.8× | -2.5% | — | 21.5% | 13.4% | 13.4% | — | 272 |
| CFG | $26.7B | 16.5× | — | 3.2× | 5.6% | — | 22.2% | 7.0% | 4.9% | — | 319 |
| FCNCA | $26.1B | 14.2× | — | 2.7× | -2.2% | — | 23.1% | 9.9% | 3.8% | — | 162 |
| ALLY | $11.6B | 16.1× | — | 1.5× | -3.3% | — | 10.8% | 5.5% | 2.5% | — | 140 |
| UCB | $4.4B | 14.0× | — | 4.1× | 11.7% | — | 30.9% | 9.0% | 8.5% | — | 84 |
| FBP | $4.0B | 12.2× | — | 3.1× | 2.4% | — | 27.5% | 17.5% | 15.3% | — | 67 |
| FHB | $3.1B | 11.4× | — | 3.5× | 8.9% | — | 31.4% | 10.0% | 10.0% | — | 74 |
| BUSE | $2.4B | 19.6× | — | 3.3× | 55.7% | — | 18.8% | 5.5% | 5.5% | — | 61 |
| GABC | $1.8B | 16.0× | — | 3.8× | 37.8% | — | 23.1% | 9.7% | 8.9% | — | 39 |
| LOB | $1.6B | 15.5× | — | — | — | — | — | 8.5% | 7.8% | — | 49 |
| PEBO | $1.4B | 12.9× | 12.8× | 16.0× | 2.3% | — | — | 8.8% | 5.8% | 3.1× | 41 |
| UVSP | $1.1B | 12.7× | — | 3.3× | 9.6% | — | 27.7% | 9.6% | 9.4% | — | 49 |
| FMNB | $927M | 10.8× | — | 3.3× | 3.9% | — | 19.5% | 11.2% | 6.4% | — | 33 |
| WASH | $736M | 14.2× | — | 3.2× | 128% | — | 22.8% | 9.6% | 9.6% | — | 39 |
| ACNB | $665M | 18.2× | — | 3.5× | 45.1% | — | 19.3% | 8.8% | 5.0% | — | 22 |
| COFS | $530M | 17.6× | — | 2.3× | 63.6% | — | 12.4% | 6.1% | 6.1% | — | 23 |
| CFFI | $357M | 13.2× | — | 2.5× | 10.6% | — | 19.1% | 10.3% | 9.5% | — | 11 |
| MYFW | $303M | 23.1× | — | 3.1× | 7.6% | — | 13.6% | 5.0% | 5.0% | — | 17 |
| MNSB | $152M | 12.1× | — | 1.1× | -1.6% | 54.3% | 11.5% | 7.1% | 7.1% | — | 16 |
Peers = companies sharing LOB's sector (State Commercial Banks) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
Return on equity (8%) and return on invested capital (8%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Cash conversion of 0.38x sits below the level that would make the earnings clearly cash-backed.
Shares outstanding are up 14% since FY2019 — per-share cash flow has grown more slowly than the totals above, and the gap is the owners'.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: share_based_compensation.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a bank.
Funded by deposits, so debt-weighted leverage and a WACC are not defined. Capital adequacy (CET1, LCR) is the right question and is not collected yet.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
At $34.47, free cash flow must compound 1.93%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record to compare against.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −22.2% | 1.9% |
| FY2025 | 33.5% | 1.9% |
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM (share count from the last fiscal year — the TTM window reports none).
The cost of capital could not be computed for this company, so the requirement is solved at the published 10% default — a different rate would move it materially.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $106M | $106M |
| Share-based comp | not reported | not reported |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $52M | $158M |
| Operating cash flow | $158M | $158M |
| Capex | −$15M | $143M |
| Free cash flow | $143M | $143M |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | 10.4 percent |
| FY2020 | 4.1 percent |
| FY2021 | 3.5 percent |
| FY2022 | 4.8 percent |
| FY2023 | -1.0 percent |
| FY2024 | -0.6 percent |
| FY2025 | -0.3 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Below the line for 1 year to the latest.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.