Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 185 of 2,417 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 14 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBOE | $32.8B | 30.2× | 20.2× | 7.0× | 15.1% | 51.5% | 23.3% | 21.4% | 16.7% | -0.5× | 268 |
| RJF | $31.0B | 15.7× | — | 1.9× | 6.6% | — | 13.4% | 17.1% | 16.2% | — | 258 |
| NMR | $27.7B | 105.2× | — | 1.6× | 15.2% | — | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.2% | — | 76 |
| TW | $25.1B | 31.4× | — | 12.2× | 18.9% | — | 39.6% | 12.5% | 12.5% | — | 127 |
| TROW | $22.7B | 11.5× | — | 3.1× | 3.1% | — | 28.5% | 19.2% | 19.2% | — | 372 |
| LPLA | $21.9B | 25.6× | — | 1.3× | 37.2% | — | 5.1% | 16.1% | 6.8% | — | 185 |
| BEN | $16.4B | 35.5× | 25.8× | 1.9× | 3.5% | — | 6.0% | 4.3% | 3.6% | 3.2× | 189 |
| CG | $14.5B | 18.6× | 9.2× | 3.0× | -11.9% | — | 16.9% | 11.5% | 11.5% | -1.5× | 146 |
| FUTU | $14.2B | — | 7.1× | 4.8× | 67.8% | 87.1% | 49.6% | 28.3% | 28.3% | -0.7× | 56 |
| SEIC | $12.4B | 18.6× | — | 5.4× | 8.1% | 35.2% | 31.1% | 29.2% | 29.2% | — | 162 |
| FRHC | $11.7B | 73.2× | — | 5.3× | 9.3% | 96.4% | 7.0% | 10.3% | 10.3% | — | 26 |
| EVR | $11.4B | 21.2× | — | 3.0× | 29.5% | — | 15.3% | 29.1% | 29.1% | — | 147 |
| JEF | $11.3B | 17.4× | — | 1.0× | 2.9% | 98.2% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 2.4% | — | 128 |
| AMG | $10.3B | 17.6× | — | 5.0× | 1.6% | — | 34.5% | 22.1% | 12.1% | — | 131 |
| SF | $10.3B | 11.7× | — | 1.6× | 6.7% | — | 10.8% | 11.4% | 10.4% | — | 145 |
Peers = companies sharing LPLA's sector (Security & Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges & Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
Average free cash flow across the last 1 positive fiscal year (FY2023). Smooths the cycle. Stock compensation is NOT charged — it is added back inside operating cash flow.
To be worth $283.74 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 40.6%/yr for a decade (off $109.3M on the 3-yr avg basis).
On the basis ($40.7M) the requirement is 55.8%/yr. Shares issued to employees are added back in operating cash flow, so this basis treats them as free.
Default is 8.9% — this company's computed cost of capital (computed WACC), the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.08B shares (market data) · net debt $6.22B
mean 22.1% · volatility σ 265% · implied rate exceeded in 1/8 yrs
Central path = implied 40.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (265%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $94.4M dividends + $100.0M buybacks = $194.4M returned on -$981.8M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 7%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $16.99B 100.0% | $12.39B 100.0% | $10.05B 100.0% | $8.60B 100.0% | $7.72B 100.0% | $5.87B 100.0% | $5.62B 100.0% | $5.19B 100.0% | $4.28B 100.0% | $4.05B 100.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $15.84B 93.2% | $10.99B 88.8% | $8.61B 85.6% | $7.49B 87.1% | $7.12B 92.2% | $5.14B 87.5% | $4.75B 84.4% | $4.47B 86.2% | $3.79B 88.5% | $3.66B 90.3% |
| Interest Expense | $403.4M 2.4% | $274.2M 2.2% | $186.8M 1.9% | $126.2M 1.5% | $104.4M 1.4% | $105.8M 1.8% | $130.0M 2.3% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $1.15B 6.8% | $1.39B 11.2% | $1.44B 14.4% | $1.11B 12.9% | $601.3M 7.8% | $626.1M 10.7% | $741.8M 13.2% | $592.6M 11.4% | $364.6M 8.5% | $297.5M 7.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $286.5M 1.7% | $334.3M 2.7% | $378.5M 3.8% | $266.0M 3.1% | $141.5M 1.8% | $153.4M 2.6% | $182.0M 3.2% | $153.2M 3.0% | $125.7M 2.9% | $105.6M 2.6% |
| Net Income | $863.0M 5.1% | $1.06B 8.5% | $1.07B 10.6% | $845.7M 9.8% | $459.9M 6.0% | $472.6M 8.0% | $559.9M 10.0% | $439.5M 8.5% | $238.9M 5.6% | $191.9M 4.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $10.97 | $14.17 | $13.88 | $10.60 | $5.75 | $5.96 | $6.78 | $4.99 | $2.65 | $2.15 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $10.92 | $14.03 | $13.69 | $10.40 | $5.63 | $5.86 | $6.62 | $4.85 | $2.59 | $2.13 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 78.7M | 74.7M | 76.8M | 79.8M | 80.0M | 79.2M | 82.6M | 88.1M | 90.0M | 89.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 79.1M | 75.4M | 77.9M | 81.3M | 81.7M | 80.7M | 84.6M | 90.6M | 92.1M | 90.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.04B covers the $0 due within a year 1037378000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~5.6% on $7.26B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-11 | Reeping Katharine Principal Accounting Officer | Open-market sale | 440 | $347.88 | $153k |
| 2026-09-05 | Field Emily Group Managing Director | Tax withholding | 106 | $359.33 | $38k |
| 2026-08-28 | Schifter Richard P Director | Grant | 14 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Putnam James S Director | Grant |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
| 7 |
| $0.00 |
| $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Mnookin Allison Director | Grant | 2 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Glavin William Francis Jr Director | Grant | 10 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Bernard Edward C Director | Grant | 3 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Eberhart Paulett Director | Grant | 4 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-28 | Thomas Corey E. Director | Grant | 4 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-08-27 | Jambusaria Aneri Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 308 | $357.36 | $110k |
| 2026-08-20 | 3 co-filers Group Managing Director | Option exercise | 7,189 | $77.53 | $557k |
| 2026-08-20 | 3 co-filers Group Managing Director | Exercise & sell | 4,119 | $355.38 | $1.5m |
| 2026-08-20 | 3 co-filers Group Managing Director | Option exercise | 7,189 | $0.00 | — |
| 2026-08-03 | Putnam James S Director | Gift | 2,000 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-07-31 | 5 co-filers Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 189 | $351.06 | $66k |
| 2026-07-31 | 5 co-filers Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 463 | $352.77 | $163k |
| 2026-07-31 | 5 co-filers Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 296 | $353.37 | $105k |
| 2026-07-31 | 5 co-filers Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 51 | $354.52 | $18k |
| 2026-07-31 | 5 co-filers Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 1 | $355.51 | $356 |
| 2026-06-17 | Jambusaria Aneri Group Managing Director | 10b5-1 plan sale | 308 | $306.00 | $94k |
| 2026-06-12 | Gates Greg Group Managing Director | Tax withholding | 232 | $295.66 | $69k |
| 2026-06-12 | Cohen Marc Eliot Group Managing Director | Tax withholding | 44 | $295.66 | $13k |
| 2026-06-04 | Thomas Corey E. Director | Grant | 7 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Schifter Richard P Director | Grant | 19 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Putnam James S Director | Grant | 10 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Mnookin Allison Director | Grant | 3 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Glavin William Francis Jr Director | Grant | 15 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Eberhart Paulett Director | Grant | 5 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-06-04 | Bernard Edward C Director | Grant | 4 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Eberhart Paulett Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Khanna Somesh Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Putnam James S Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Mnookin Allison Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Ko Albert J Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | Glavin William Francis Jr Director | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 712 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-05-15 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 348 | $0.00 | $0 |
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 57th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 16% against ROIC 7% — 9% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is 20.9% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| Net Income | 8.5 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 9.8 | 10.6 | 8.5 | 5.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LPLA: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | not reported | not reported | 4.7% |
| FY2017 | not reported | not reported | 5.6% |
| FY2018 | not reported | not reported | 8.5% |
| FY2019 | not reported | not reported | 10.0% |
| FY2020 | not reported | not reported | 8.0% |
| FY2021 | not reported | not reported | 6.0% |
| FY2022 | not reported | not reported | 9.8% |
| FY2023 | not reported | not reported | 10.6% |
| FY2024 | not reported | not reported | 8.5% |
| FY2025 | not reported | not reported | 5.1% |
Leverage and buybacks account for 9 points of the 16% return on equity in FY2025. The business earns 7% on the capital it employs; the rest is balance sheet.
ROE is on average equity; ROIC is NOPAT over average invested capital (debt plus equity less excess cash). The gap is not a single adjustment.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Free cash flow has fallen short of reported profit in 3 of the last three years.
Reported free cash flow is -$982M; after share-based compensation it is -$1.06B. The difference is a real cost that the cash flow statement adds back.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
Ladder as of 2025-12-31 (10-K); cash from the 2025-12-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2025. Free cash flow is negative, so projected resources fall rather than accumulate.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: ebitda.
At $279.54, free cash flow must compound 40.38%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record to compare against.
| Fiscal year | FCF growth | Price requires |
|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 35.7% | 40.4% |
| FY2021 | −62.6% | 40.4% |
| FY2022 | 591.1% | 40.4% |
| FY2023 | −93.3% | 40.4% |
| FY2024 | −360.6% | 40.4% |
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. TTM basis: TTM (share count from the last fiscal year — the TTM window reports none).
The implied rate has been matched or beaten in 1 of the last 5 years.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $863M | $863M |
| Share-based comp | $79M | $942M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$1.35B | −$411M |
| Operating cash flow | −$411M | −$411M |
| Capex | −$570M | −$982M |
| Free cash flow | −$982M | −$982M |
| FCF after SBC | −$1.06B | −$1.06B |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 4.4% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2021 | 31.5% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2022 | 11.4% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2023 | 16.9% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2024 | 23.2% | not reported | not reported |
| FY2025 | 37.2% | not reported | not reported |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | -1.1 percent |
| FY2020 | -4.8 percent |
| FY2021 | 0.1 percent |
| FY2022 | -11.6 percent |
| FY2023 | 5.3 percent |
| FY2024 | 5.9 percent |
| FY2025 | 6.9 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.