Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 397 of 5,944 reporting institutions (96th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 15%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $782M covers all $420M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-06-30 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| LRN | $3.6B | 13.9× | 6.8× | 1.5× | 17.9% | 39.2% | 12.0% | 19.5% | 15.2% | 0.9× | 397 |
Peers = companies sharing LRN's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.41B 100.0% | $2.04B 100.0% | $1.84B 100.0% | $1.69B 100.0% | $1.54B 100.0% | $1.04B 100.0% | $1.02B 100.0% | $917.7M 100.0% | $888.5M 100.0% | $872.7M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.46B 60.8% | $1.28B 62.6% | $1.19B 64.8% | $1.09B 64.6% | $1.00B 65.2% | $693.2M 66.6% | $663.4M 65.3% | $592.5M 64.6% | $557.3M 62.7% | — |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $592.5M 64.6% | $557.3M 62.7% | $546.5M 62.6% |
| Gross Profit | $943.9M 39.2% | $763.6M 37.4% | $647.1M 35.2% | $596.5M 35.4% | $534.9M 34.8% | $347.5M 33.4% | $352.3M 34.7% | $325.2M 35.4% | — | — |
| Research & Development | $16.6M 0.7% | $16.7M 0.8% | $15.5M 0.8% | $7.5M 0.4% | $3.7M 0.2% | $9.7M 0.9% | $9.5M 0.9% | $9.2M 1.0% | $12.5M 1.4% | $10.1M 1.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $524.3M 21.8% | $514.0M 25.2% | $481.6M 26.2% | $439.8M 26.1% | $424.4M 27.6% | $315.1M 30.3% | $306.8M 30.2% | $299.7M 32.7% | $305.6M 34.4% | $302.2M 34.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — | — | $970.3M 95.5% | $892.2M 97.2% | $875.4M 98.5% | $858.8M 98.4% |
| Operating Income | $360.1M 15.0% | $249.6M 12.2% | $165.5M 9.0% | $156.6M 9.3% | $110.5M 7.2% | $32.5M 3.1% | $45.5M 4.5% | $25.5M 2.8% | $13.1M 1.5% | $13.9M 1.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $33.6M 1.4% | $26.9M 1.3% | $15.5M 0.8% | -$1.3M -0.1% | $2.8M 0.2% | $272K 0.0% | $114K 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $380.9M 15.8% | $268.7M 13.2% | $172.2M 9.4% | $147.2M 8.7% | $96.0M 6.2% | $33.4M 3.2% | $48.4M 4.8% | $26.5M 2.9% | $4.9M 0.6% | $13.3M 1.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $93.0M 3.9% | $64.5M 3.2% | $45.3M 2.5% | $40.1M 2.4% | $24.5M 1.6% | $8.5M 0.8% | $10.5M 1.0% | -$910K -0.1% | $5.4M 0.6% | $5.4M 0.6% |
| Net Income | $287.9M 12.0% | $204.2M 10.0% | $126.9M 6.9% | $107.1M 6.4% | $71.5M 4.6% | $24.5M 2.4% | $37.2M 3.7% | $27.6M 3.0% | $451K 0.1% | $9.0M 1.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.69 | $4.79 | $3.00 | $2.58 | $1.78 | $0.62 | $0.96 | $0.70 | $0.01 | $0.24 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.95 | $4.69 | $2.97 | $2.52 | $1.71 | $0.60 | $0.91 | $0.68 | $0.01 | $0.23 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 43.0M | 42.6M | 42.3M | 41.5M | 40.2M | 39.5M | 38.8M | 39.3M | 38.3M | 37.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 48.4M | 43.5M | 42.7M | 42.4M | 41.9M | 40.7M | 40.9M | 40.6M | 39.5M | 38.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $82.58 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -0.9%/yr for a decade (off $302M normalized FCF).
The market's -0.9% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt -$366M
mean 21.9% · volatility σ 38% · implied rate exceeded in 7/9 yrs
Central path = implied -0.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (38%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $431M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 57th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 2.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 64.6 | 65.3 | 66.6 | 65.2 | 64.6 | 64.8 | 62.6 | 60.8 |
| Gross Profit | 35.4 | 34.7 | 33.4 | 34.8 | 35.4 | 35.2 | 37.4 | 39.2 |
| R&D | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| SG&A | 32.7 | 30.2 | 30.3 | 27.6 | 26.1 | 26.2 | 25.2 | 21.8 |
| Operating Income | 2.8 | 4.5 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 12.2 | 15.0 |
| Income Tax | -0.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.9 |
| Net Income | 3.0 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 12.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LRN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.