Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.50% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $29.38 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 19.3%/yr for a decade (off $9M normalized FCF).
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$6M
mean 230.3% · volatility σ 897% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 19.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (897%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $212.5M 100.0% | $186.8M 100.0% | $160.1M 100.0% | $141.6M 100.0% | $119.1M 100.0% | $102.0M 100.0% | $93.7M 100.0% | $103.3M 100.0% | $118.9M 100.0% | $123.9M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $154.3M 72.6% | $138.2M 74.0% | $117.7M 73.5% | $114.8M 81.1% | $90.4M 75.9% | $75.1M 73.6% | $71.5M 76.4% | $77.5M 75.0% | $88.2M 74.2% | $88.8M 71.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $88.2M 74.2% | $88.8M 71.7% |
| Gross Profit | $58.2M 27.4% | $48.6M 26.0% | $42.4M 26.5% | $26.8M 18.9% | $28.7M 24.1% | $26.9M 26.4% | $22.1M 23.6% | $25.9M 25.0% | $30.7M 25.8% | $35.0M 28.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $21.6M 10.2% | $19.4M 10.4% | $13.1M 8.2% | $12.6M 8.9% | $11.6M 9.8% | $11.7M 11.4% | $12.8M 13.7% | $13.6M 13.2% | $14.0M 11.7% | $13.8M 11.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $42.0M 19.8% | $34.7M 18.6% | $25.4M 15.9% | $24.4M 17.3% | $22.8M 19.2% | $22.0M 21.6% | $24.1M 25.7% | $29.0M 28.0% | $31.2M 26.3% | $28.9M 23.4% |
| Operating Income | $16.2M 7.6% | $13.9M 7.4% | $17.0M 10.6% | $2.3M 1.7% | $5.9M 4.9% | $4.9M 4.8% | -$1.9M -2.1% | -$3.1M -3.0% | -$526K -0.4% | $6.1M 4.9% |
| Interest Expense | $77K 0.0% | $105K 0.1% | $384K 0.2% | $267K 0.2% | $116K 0.1% | $118K 0.1% | $249K 0.3% | $271K 0.3% | $242K 0.2% | $220K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.5M 1.7% | $117K 0.1% | -$346K -0.2% | -$508K -0.4% | -$264K -0.2% | -$95K -0.1% | $3.2M 3.4% | -$201K -0.2% | -$278K -0.2% | -$448K -0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $19.7M 9.3% | $14.0M 7.5% | $16.6M 10.4% | $1.8M 1.3% | $5.6M 4.7% | $4.8M 4.7% | $1.2M 1.3% | -$3.3M -3.2% | -$804K -0.7% | $5.6M 4.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $5.8M 2.7% | $4.9M 2.6% | $5.3M 3.3% | $917K 0.6% | $2.3M 1.9% | $1.6M 1.6% | $782K 0.8% | -$225K -0.2% | -$458K -0.4% | $2.2M 1.7% |
| Net Income | $13.9M 6.5% | $9.0M 4.8% | $11.4M 7.1% | $924K 0.7% | $3.3M 2.8% | $3.2M 3.2% | $453K 0.5% | -$3.1M -3.0% | -$346K -0.3% | $3.5M 2.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.91 | $0.61 | $0.77 | $0.06 | $0.21 | $0.21 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | $-0.02 | $0.22 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.89 | $0.60 | $0.75 | $0.06 | $0.21 | $0.21 | $0.03 | $-0.19 | $-0.02 | $0.22 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 15.2M | 14.8M | 14.7M | 15.4M | 15.5M | 15.6M | 15.7M | 15.9M | 16.1M | 16.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 15.5M | 15.1M | 15.1M | 15.7M | 15.8M | 15.8M | 15.8M | 16.3M | 16.1M | 16.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$16M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 16%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $6M covers the $875002 due within a year 6.4× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2013-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 75th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 75.0 | 76.4 | 73.6 | 75.9 | 81.1 | 73.5 | 74.0 | 72.6 |
| Gross Profit | 25.0 | 23.6 | 26.4 | 24.1 | 18.9 | 26.5 | 26.0 | 27.4 |
| SG&A | 13.2 | 13.7 | 11.4 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 10.4 | 10.2 |
| Operating Income | -3.0 | -2.1 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 7.4 | 7.6 |
| Income Tax | -0.2 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| Net Income | -3.0 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 6.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LWAY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| LWAY | $448M | 33.0× | 21.9× | 2.1× | 13.7% | 27.4% | 6.5% | 16.1% | 16.1% | — | 79 |
Peers = companies sharing LWAY's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position