Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 510 of 5,944 reporting institutions (97th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $16.48 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -7.8%/yr for a decade (off $1.0B normalized FCF).
The market's -7.8% is more conservative than its 1-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.41B shares · net debt -$130M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.32B 100.0% | $5.79B 100.0% | $4.40B 100.0% | $4.10B 100.0% | $3.21B 100.0% | $2.36B 100.0% | $3.62B 100.0% | $2.16B 100.0% | $1.06B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.70B 58.5% | $3.34B 57.7% | $2.54B 57.8% | $2.44B 59.5% | $1.70B 53.1% | $1.45B 61.2% | $2.18B 60.2% | $1.24B 57.7% | $659.5M 62.2% |
| Research & Development | $451.4M 7.1% | $397.1M 6.9% | $555.9M 12.6% | $856.8M 20.9% | $911.9M 28.4% | $909.1M 38.4% | $1.51B 41.6% | $300.8M 13.9% | $136.6M 12.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.00B 15.9% | $937.3M 16.2% | $871.1M 19.8% | $1.29B 31.4% | $915.6M 28.5% | $946.1M 40.0% | $1.19B 32.8% | $447.9M 20.8% | $221.4M 20.9% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $6.50B 103.0% | $5.90B 102.1% | $4.88B 110.8% | $5.55B 135.6% | $4.34B 135.4% | $4.17B 176.5% | $6.32B 174.7% | $3.13B 145.3% | $1.77B 166.8% |
| Operating Income | -$188.4M -3.0% | -$118.9M -2.1% | -$475.6M -10.8% | -$1.46B -35.6% | -$1.14B -35.4% | -$1.81B -76.5% | -$2.70B -74.7% | -$977.7M -45.3% | -$708.3M -66.8% |
| Interest Expense | $20.8M 0.3% | $28.9M 0.5% | $26.2M 0.6% | $19.7M 0.5% | $51.6M 1.6% | $32.7M 1.4% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | $166.3M 2.9% | $145.7M 3.3% | $47.1M 1.2% | $9.1M 0.3% | $43.7M 1.8% | $102.5M 2.8% | $66.5M 3.1% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $155.9M 2.5% | $173.2M 3.0% | $170.1M 3.9% | -$100.0M -2.4% | $135.9M 4.2% | $43.7M 1.8% | $102.6M 2.8% | $67.1M 3.1% | $284K 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$53.2M -0.8% | $25.4M 0.4% | -$331.7M -7.5% | -$1.58B -38.5% | -$1.05B -32.8% | -$1.80B -76.0% | -$2.60B -71.9% | -$910.6M -42.2% | -$687.7M -64.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$2.90B -45.9% | $2.6M 0.0% | $8.6M 0.2% | $5.9M 0.1% | $11.2M 0.3% | -$44.5M -1.9% | $2.4M 0.1% | $738K 0.0% | $556K 0.1% |
| Net Income | $2.84B 45.0% | $22.8M 0.4% | -$340.3M -7.7% | -$1.58B -38.7% | -$1.06B -33.1% | -$1.75B -74.1% | -$2.60B -72.0% | -$911.3M -42.3% | -$688.3M -64.9% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $6.92 | $0.06 | $-0.88 | $-4.47 | $-3.17 | $-5.61 | $-11.44 | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $6.81 | $0.06 | $-0.88 | $-4.47 | $-3.17 | $-5.61 | $-11.44 | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 410.8M | 409.2M | 385.3M | 354.7M | 334.7M | 312.2M | 227.5M | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 417.7M | 413.7M | 385.3M | 354.7M | 334.7M | 312.2M | 227.5M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $500M buybacks = $500M returned on $1.2B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 67%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.1B covers all $1.1B of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~2.1% on $1.0B of debt.
Cash of $1.1B fully covers short-term debt of $51M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 16th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 6.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 57.7 | 60.2 | 61.2 | 53.1 | 59.5 | 57.8 | 57.7 | 58.5 |
| R&D | 13.9 | 41.6 | 38.4 | 28.4 | 20.9 | 12.6 | 6.9 | 7.1 |
| SG&A | 20.8 | 32.8 | 40.0 | 28.5 | 31.4 | 19.8 | 16.2 | 15.9 |
| Operating Income | -45.3 | -74.7 | -76.5 | -35.4 | -35.6 | -10.8 | -2.1 | -3.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.1 | -1.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -45.9 |
| Net Income | -42.3 | -72.0 | -74.1 | -33.1 | -38.7 | -7.7 | 0.4 | 45.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on LYFT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| LYFT | $6.8B | 2.4× | — | 1.1× | 9.2% | 41.5% | 45.0% | 86.9% | 66.5% | -18.9× | 510 |
Peers = companies sharing LYFT's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.