Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q3 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading insider activity...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 41% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $24.5M dividends + $0 buybacks = $24.5M returned on $59.6M FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · -10%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Expense | — | — | $212.5M | $118.9M | $27.3M | $36.9M | $90.1M | $70.5M | $43.7M | $33.8M |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $13.2M | $21.7M | $46.0M | -$61.2M | $59.6M | -$424.1M | $39.1M | -$71.5M | $43.6M | -$4.7M |
| Pretax Income | $49.6M | $55.8M | $55.2M | -$42.8M | $72.3M | -$420.0M | $89.7M | -$12.1M | $105.9M | $62.2M |
| Income Tax Expense | $888K | $112K | $250K | $163K | $0 | — | — | — | — | $0 |
| Net Income | $48.7M | $55.7M | $53.8M | -$53.1M | $104.2M | -$420.9M | $92.9M | $1.6M | $118.6M | $63.7M |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.90 | $1.23 | $1.68 | -$3.12 | $5.29 | -$36.73 | $2.39 | -$0.42 | $3.77 | $1.80 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.90 | $1.23 | $1.68 | -$3.12 | $5.29 | -$36.73 | $2.39 | -$0.42 | $3.77 | $1.80 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 30.5M | 29.5M | 21.1M | 22.9M | 16.2M | 11.7M | 32.2M | 28.4M | 27.9M | 28.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 30.6M | 29.5M | 21.1M | 22.9M | 16.2M | 11.7M | 32.2M | 28.4M | 27.9M | 28.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 17 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Last reported position per insider, carried forward. Steps can be a holding disclosed for the first time rather than a trade.
| Date | Insider | What it was | Shares | Price | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-31 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 0 | $7.09 | — |
| 2026-04-30 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Other | 0 | $7.69 | — |
| 2026-04-29 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 16,931 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-29 | 2 co-filers Group filing | Grant | 12,979 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 2,777 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-04-01 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 3,819 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-30 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 0 | $8.97 | — |
| 2026-01-13 | Neslin Jenny B General Counsel & Secretary | Tax withholding | 7,640 | $8.86 | $68k |
| 2026-01-13 | Rossiello Anthony William CFO & Treasurer | Tax withholding | 6,933 | $8.86 | $61k |
| 2026-01-02 | Hess Debra Ann Director | Grant | 3,201 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Hurley Dianne Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Jozoff Matthew Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2026-01-02 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Grant | 2,328 | $0.00 | $0 |
| 2025-10-31 | Mitchell M Christian Director | Other | 459 | $7.07 | — |
Every row is classified by what it MEANT, not by its SEC code. A code is not a meaning: code P (“purchase”) also covers dividend reinvestment and employee stock purchase plans, and code S (“sale”) also covers 10b5-1 plan sales scheduled months earlier and option exercises sold the same day.
Across 30 days of all filings, $5.08bn of insider selling contained $3.50bn of plan sales and $0.46bn of exercise-and-sell. Only 29% was discretionary. Reading an unclassified feed badly overstates how much insiders decided.
Buys and sales are counted separately and never netted. They are different decisions by different people; a company where one officer bought while another sold is not “neutral”.
The holding line carries each insider's last reported position forward, so it shows the total held rather than a sawtooth of whoever traded that day. It covers only insiders who filed in the window.
“Filed late” counts calendar days past the two-business-day deadline with five days' grace, so a Thursday or Friday trade crossing a weekend is never flagged. It describes the company's filing discipline, not the trade.
Insider activity is descriptive. Nothing here is investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 9% against ROIC 9% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MITT: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
Cost of capital cannot be computed, so the spread is unknown.
Return on equity (9%) and return on invested capital (9%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: beta, market_cap.
Converts 0.74x of reported profit into cash — adequate, without much margin.
The cash conversion cycle could not be computed — receivables, inventory or cost of revenue is not reported — so the earliest accrual warning is not part of this verdict.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No current price or share count, so the market's assumption cannot be solved for.
The percentile ranks the FISCAL-YEAR point, because the distribution behind each strip is built from fiscal-year closes — ranking a TTM figure inside it would compare two different bases. No TTM point: the four most recent quarters do not form a usable window.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: market_cap.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $49M | $49M |
| Share-based comp | $712,000 | $49M |
| Other non-cash & working capital | $10M | $60M |
| Operating cash flow | $60M | $60M |
| Capex | $0 | $60M |
| Free cash flow | $60M | $60M |
| FCF after SBC | $59M | $59M |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | 0.6 percent |
| FY2020 | -30.4 percent |
| FY2021 | 2.3 percent |
| FY2022 | -1.7 percent |
| FY2023 | 0.4 percent |
| FY2024 | 0.0 percent |
| FY2025 | -0.1 percent |
SBC is added back inside operating cash flow, so reported free cash flow treats shares issued to employees as free. Percent of revenue says how expensive the payroll is; percent of operating cash flow says how much of the cash exists only because the charge was added back. The buyback offset is buybacks over SBC — below 1.0 the repurchase does not cover the shares issued.
Figures are the latest fiscal year (FY2025) from the company's own filings, not a trailing-twelve-month window — Q2 reads fiscal years throughout so the cash-conversion ratios and these share one basis. A blank is a line the filer did not report; it is never read as zero.