Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.12% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 3 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $671.3M 100.0% | $653.4M 100.0% | $664.4M 100.0% | $744.2M 100.0% | $732.4M 100.0% | $506.4M 100.0% | $701.0M 100.0% | $679.6M 100.0% | $568.0M 100.0% | $552.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $307.7M 45.8% | $300.2M 46.0% | $300.2M 45.2% | $315.1M 42.3% | $313.3M 42.8% | $235.9M 46.6% | $326.1M 46.5% | $310.2M 45.6% | $269.9M 47.5% | $257.9M 46.7% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $269.9M 47.5% | $257.9M 46.7% |
| Gross Profit | $363.6M 54.2% | $353.1M 54.0% | $364.2M 54.8% | $429.1M 57.7% | $419.1M 57.2% | $270.5M 53.4% | $374.9M 53.5% | $369.4M 54.4% | $298.1M 52.5% | $294.8M 53.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $333.8M 49.7% | $333.1M 51.0% | $315.7M 47.5% | $313.5M 42.1% | $301.6M 41.2% | $256.7M 50.7% | $331.9M 47.3% | $307.2M 45.2% | $254.9M 44.9% | $240.8M 43.6% |
| Total Operating Expenses | — | — | — | $313.5M 42.1% | $301.6M 41.2% | $412.6M 81.5% | $331.9M 47.3% | $307.2M 45.2% | — | — |
| Operating Income | $29.8M 4.4% | $20.0M 3.1% | $48.5M 7.3% | $115.6M 15.5% | $117.5M 16.0% | -$142.1M -28.1% | $43.0M 6.1% | $62.2M 9.2% | $43.2M 7.6% | $54.0M 9.8% |
| Interest Expense | $507K 0.1% | $489K 0.1% | $497K 0.1% | $518K 0.1% | $688K 0.1% | $2.0M 0.4% | $930K 0.1% | $771K 0.1% | $1.5M 0.3% | $1.5M 0.3% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | $45K 0.0% | $86K 0.0% | $307K 0.0% | $452K 0.1% | $219K 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $34.4M 5.1% | $26.7M 4.1% | $54.0M 8.1% | $117.1M 15.7% | $117.3M 16.0% | -$142.4M -28.1% | $57.5M 8.2% | $61.7M 9.1% | $42.1M 7.4% | $51.5M 9.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | $7.5M 1.1% | $7.4M 1.1% | $11.8M 1.8% | $24.3M 3.3% | $24.8M 3.4% | -$31.2M -6.2% | $15.1M 2.2% | $162K 0.0% | $57.4M 10.1% | $16.3M 3.0% |
| Net Income | $26.6M 4.0% | $18.4M 2.8% | $41.3M 6.2% | $90.4M 12.1% | $90.2M 12.3% | -$111.5M -22.0% | $42.7M 6.1% | $61.6M 9.1% | -$15.2M -2.7% | $35.1M 6.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.19 | $0.82 | $1.86 | $4.02 | $3.95 | $-4.80 | $1.85 | $2.66 | $-0.66 | $1.52 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.17 | $0.81 | $1.83 | $3.94 | $3.87 | $-4.80 | $1.83 | $2.61 | $-0.66 | $1.51 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 22.2M | 22.3M | 22.2M | 22.5M | 23.2M | 23.2M | 23.1M | 23.2M | 23.1M | 23.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 22.6M | 22.6M | 22.6M | 23.0M | 23.7M | 23.2M | 23.3M | 23.6M | 23.1M | 23.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
8/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81 · book equity (no price)
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 58% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $31M dividends + $4M buybacks = $35M returned on $53M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 17.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 45.6 | 46.5 | 46.6 | 42.8 | 42.3 | 45.2 | 46.0 | 45.8 |
| Gross Profit | 54.4 | 53.5 | 53.4 | 57.2 | 57.7 | 54.8 | 54.0 | 54.2 |
| SG&A | 45.2 | 47.3 | 50.7 | 41.2 | 42.1 | 47.5 | 51.0 | 49.7 |
| Operating Income | 9.2 | 6.1 | -28.1 | 16.0 | 15.5 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 4.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 2.2 | -6.2 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Net Income | 9.1 | 6.1 | -22.0 | 12.3 | 12.1 | 6.2 | 2.8 | 4.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MOVAA: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.