Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 1,477 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| MRVL | $178.8B | 68.7× | 116.9× | 21.8× | 42.1% | 51.0% | 32.6% | 18.7% | 14.2% | 2.9× | 1,477 |
Peers = companies sharing MRVL's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 14%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2.6B covers the $500M due within a year 5.3× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-01-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.5% on $4.5B of debt.
Cash of $2.6B fully covers short-term debt of $500M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $211.02 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 34.9%/yr for a decade (off $1.3B normalized FCF).
The market's 34.9% is more optimistic than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.85B shares · net debt $1.8B
mean 40.6% · volatility σ 63% · implied rate exceeded in 3/6 yrs
Central path = implied 34.9%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (63%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 15% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $205M dividends + $2.0B buybacks = $2.2B returned on $1.4B FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 0%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2021 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.7 | 49.9 | 53.7 | 49.5 | 58.4 | 58.7 | 49.0 |
| Gross Profit | 50.3 | 50.1 | 46.3 | 50.5 | 41.6 | 41.3 | 51.0 |
| R&D | 40.0 | 36.1 | 31.9 | 30.1 | 34.4 | 33.8 | 25.3 |
| SG&A | 17.2 | 15.7 | 21.4 | 14.3 | 15.1 | 13.8 | 9.4 |
| Operating Income | -9.0 | -8.7 | -7.8 | 4.0 | -10.3 | -12.5 | 16.1 |
| Income Tax | -29.1 | -1.5 | -1.4 | 4.2 | 3.2 | -0.2 | 4.6 |
| Net Income | 58.7 | -9.3 | -9.4 | -2.8 | -16.9 | -15.3 | 32.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MRVL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.19B 100.0% | $5.77B 100.0% | $5.51B 100.0% | $5.92B 100.0% | $4.46B 100.0% | $2.97B 100.0% | $2.70B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.01B 49.0% | $3.39B 58.7% | $3.21B 58.4% | $2.93B 49.5% | $2.40B 53.7% | $1.48B 49.9% | $1.34B 49.7% |
| Gross Profit | $4.18B 51.0% | $2.38B 41.3% | $2.29B 41.6% | $2.99B 50.5% | $2.06B 46.3% | $1.49B 50.1% | $1.36B 50.3% |
| Research & Development | $2.08B 25.3% | $1.95B 33.8% | $1.90B 34.4% | $1.78B 30.1% | $1.42B 31.9% | $1.07B 36.1% | $1.08B 40.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $767.1M 9.4% | $798.2M 13.8% | $834.0M 15.1% | $843.6M 14.3% | $955.3M 21.4% | $467.2M 15.7% | $464.6M 17.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.86B 34.9% | $3.10B 53.8% | $2.86B 52.0% | $2.75B 46.4% | $2.41B 54.0% | $1.75B 58.8% | $1.60B 59.3% |
| Operating Income | $1.32B 16.1% | -$720.3M -12.5% | -$567.7M -10.3% | $238.0M 4.0% | -$347.7M -7.8% | -$258.4M -8.7% | -$243.4M -9.0% |
| Interest Expense | $202.6M 2.5% | $189.4M 3.3% | $211.7M 3.8% | $170.6M 2.9% | $139.3M 3.1% | $69.3M 2.3% | $85.6M 3.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.72B 21.0% | -$174.4M -3.0% | -$191.0M -3.5% | -$152.9M -2.6% | -$135.8M -3.0% | -$63.8M -2.1% | $1.04B 38.6% |
| Pretax Income | $3.05B 37.2% | -$894.7M -15.5% | -$758.7M -13.8% | $85.1M 1.4% | -$483.5M -10.8% | -$322.2M -10.9% | $798.4M 29.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $376.5M 4.6% | -$9.7M -0.2% | $174.7M 3.2% | $248.6M 4.2% | -$62.5M -1.4% | -$44.9M -1.5% | -$786.0M -29.1% |
| Net Income | $2.67B 32.6% | -$885.0M -15.3% | -$933.4M -16.9% | -$163.5M -2.8% | -$421.0M -9.4% | -$277.3M -9.3% | $1.58B 58.7% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.10 | $-1.02 | $-1.08 | $-0.19 | $-0.53 | $-0.41 | $2.38 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.07 | $-1.02 | $-1.08 | $-0.19 | $-0.53 | $-0.41 | $2.34 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 861.0M | 865.5M | 861.3M | 851.4M | 796.9M | 668.8M | 664.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 869.7M | 865.5M | 861.3M | 851.4M | 796.9M | 668.8M | 676.1M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.