Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 317 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| MTRN | $6.2B | 83.0× | 37.0× | 3.5× | 6.0% | 17.3% | 4.2% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 317 |
Peers = companies sharing MTRN's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $297.08 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 33.8%/yr for a decade (off $50M normalized FCF).
The market's 33.8% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt $445M
mean 29.5% · volatility σ 164% · implied rate exceeded in 2/8 yrs
Central path = implied 33.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (164%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 12% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $12M dividends + $8M buybacks = $19M returned on $98M FCF.
9 consecutive years of dividend increases · 4%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $14M is below the $22M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.7% on $459M of debt.
Cash of $14M is below short-term debt of $22M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.79B 100.0% | $1.68B 100.0% | $1.67B 100.0% | $1.76B 100.0% | $1.51B 100.0% | $1.18B 100.0% | $1.19B 100.0% | $1.21B 100.0% | $1.14B 100.0% | $969.2M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.48B 82.7% | $1.36B 80.7% | $1.32B 79.0% | $1.41B 80.4% | $1.23B 81.2% | $983.6M 83.6% | $922.7M 77.8% | $956.5M 79.2% | $926.6M 81.3% | $784.7M 81.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $928.0M 81.4% | $785.8M 81.1% |
| Gross Profit | $308.6M 17.3% | $326.0M 19.3% | $349.0M 21.0% | $343.9M 19.6% | $283.8M 18.8% | $192.6M 16.4% | $262.7M 22.2% | $251.4M 20.8% | $212.8M 18.7% | $184.5M 19.0% |
| Research & Development | $25.9M 1.5% | $29.0M 1.7% | $27.5M 1.7% | $29.0M 1.6% | $26.6M 1.8% | $20.3M 1.7% | $18.3M 1.5% | $15.2M 1.3% | $14.0M 1.2% | $12.8M 1.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $143.1M 8.0% | $145.6M 8.6% | $157.9M 9.5% | $169.3M 9.6% | $163.8M 10.8% | $134.0M 11.4% | $147.2M 12.4% | $153.5M 12.7% | $144.3M 12.7% | $129.0M 13.3% |
| Operating Income | $109.8M 6.1% | $47.2M 2.8% | $136.4M 8.2% | $119.8M 6.8% | $77.1M 5.1% | $8.2M 0.7% | $70.5M 6.0% | $61.8M 5.1% | $40.0M 3.5% | $28.9M 3.0% |
| Interest Expense | $30.7M 1.7% | $34.8M 2.1% | $31.3M 1.9% | $21.9M 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.4M 0.1% | $2.4M 0.1% | $2.7M 0.2% | $5.3M 0.3% | $5.1M 0.3% | $3.9M 0.3% | -$3.4M -0.3% | -$42.7M -3.5% | -$1.5M -0.1% | -$1.8M -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $81.5M 4.6% | $14.9M 0.9% | $107.8M 6.5% | $103.1M 5.9% | $77.3M 5.1% | $8.3M 0.7% | $65.5M 5.5% | $16.6M 1.4% | $36.4M 3.2% | $25.3M 2.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $6.7M 0.4% | $9.0M 0.5% | $12.1M 0.7% | $17.1M 1.0% | $4.9M 0.3% | -$7.2M -0.6% | $12.1M 1.0% | -$4.4M -0.4% | $24.9M 2.2% | -$425K -0.0% |
| Net Income | $74.8M 4.2% | $5.9M 0.3% | $95.7M 5.7% | $86.0M 4.9% | $72.5M 4.8% | $15.5M 1.3% | $53.4M 4.5% | $21.0M 1.7% | $11.5M 1.0% | $25.7M 2.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.61 | $0.28 | $4.64 | $4.19 | $3.55 | $0.76 | $2.62 | $1.04 | $0.57 | $1.29 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.58 | $0.28 | $4.58 | $4.14 | $3.50 | $0.75 | $2.59 | $1.02 | $0.56 | $1.27 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 20.8M | 20.7M | 20.6M | 20.5M | 20.4M | 20.3M | 20.4M | 20.2M | 20.0M | 20.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 20.9M | 20.9M | 20.9M | 20.8M | 20.7M | 20.6M | 20.7M | 20.6M | 20.4M | 20.2M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 95th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 21.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 79.2 | 77.8 | 83.6 | 81.2 | 80.4 | 79.0 | 80.7 | 82.7 |
| Gross Profit | 20.8 | 22.2 | 16.4 | 18.8 | 19.6 | 21.0 | 19.3 | 17.3 |
| R&D | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| SG&A | 12.7 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| Operating Income | 5.1 | 6.0 | 0.7 | 5.1 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 6.1 |
| Income Tax | -0.4 | 1.0 | -0.6 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Net Income | 1.7 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 0.3 | 4.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on MTRN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.