Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $17.29 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 16.6%/yr for a decade (off $140M normalized FCF).
The market's 16.6% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares (market data) · net debt $3.2B
mean -418.7% · volatility σ 1234% · implied rate exceeded in 2/6 yrs
Central path = implied 16.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (1234%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $48M buybacks = $48M returned on $145M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $9M is below the $11M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~8.0% on $3.2B of debt.
Cash of $9M is below short-term debt of $11M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.16B 100.0% | $3.47B 100.0% | $4.15B 100.0% | $5.68B 100.0% | $7.95B 100.0% | $5.23B 100.0% | $7.58B 100.0% | $8.69B 100.0% | $6.95B 100.0% | $5.22B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.18B 69.1% | $2.51B 72.3% | $3.19B 76.7% | $4.69B 82.6% | $7.14B 89.8% | $4.49B 86.0% | $6.60B 87.1% | $7.98B 91.9% | $6.26B 90.1% | $4.74B 90.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $70.1M 2.2% | $55.6M 1.6% | $121.6M 2.9% | $71.5M 1.3% | $63.5M 0.8% | $70.5M 1.3% | $113.7M 1.5% | $107.4M 1.2% | $98.0M 1.4% | $100.8M 1.9% |
| Operating Income | $94.7M 3.0% | $329.4M 9.5% | $161.9M 3.9% | $244.0M 4.3% | $83.0M 1.0% | -$390.8M -7.5% | -$3.3M -0.0% | $126.7M 1.5% | $187.3M 2.7% | $226.5M 4.3% |
| Interest Expense | $257.5M 8.2% | $280.1M 8.1% | $269.8M 6.5% | $275.4M 4.9% | $271.6M 3.4% | $198.8M 3.8% | $181.2M 2.4% | $164.7M 1.9% | $199.1M 2.9% | $149.6M 2.9% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $526K 0.0% | $4.3M 0.1% | $2.8M 0.1% | $30.4M 0.5% | $2.3M 0.0% | -$36.5M -0.7% | $1.7M 0.0% | -$30.4M -0.4% | $6.4M 0.1% | $26.4M 0.5% |
| Pretax Income | -$178.8M -5.7% | $60.1M 1.7% | -$156.3M -3.8% | $9.3M 0.2% | -$183.1M -2.3% | -$640.8M -12.3% | -$180.2M -2.4% | -$78.2M -0.9% | -$21.1M -0.3% | $117.5M 2.3% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$276K -0.0% | -$4.9M -0.1% | $1.5M 0.0% | $219K 0.0% | $971K 0.0% | -$3.4M -0.1% | $345K 0.0% | $1.2M 0.0% | $1.4M 0.0% | $1.9M 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$142.3M -4.5% | $39.4M 1.1% | -$143.8M -3.5% | $51.4M 0.9% | -$184.8M -2.3% | -$639.8M -12.2% | -$397.0M -5.2% | $360.0M 4.1% | -$70.9M -1.0% | $137.0M 2.6% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 238 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $689.9B | 24.6× | — | 2.1× | -5.0% | — | 8.7% | 11.1% | 10.7% | — | 4,568 |
| SHEL | $550.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,521 |
| CVX | $392.3B | 32.0× | — | 2.1× | -6.8% | 42.8% | 6.5% | 6.6% | 6.6% | — | 4,121 |
| TTE | $201.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 951 |
| COP | $171.1B | 21.5× | — | 2.9× | 7.7% | 62.1% | 13.6% | 12.4% | 12.2% | — | 2,450 |
| PBR | $157.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 524 |
| MPC | $120.9B | 30.0× | 10.4× | 0.9× | -4.4% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 23.4% | 20.6% | 0.2× | 1,802 |
| VLO | $118.3B | 50.6× | 22.4× | 1.0× | -5.5% | 4.4% | 1.9% | 9.9% | 7.1% | 1.7× | 1,781 |
| BP | $118.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,220 |
| EQNR | $111.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 398 |
| PSX | $104.4B | 23.8× | — | 0.8× | -7.5% | 12.3% | 3.3% | 15.1% | 14.6% | — | 2,041 |
| WMB | $87.9B | 33.6× | 17.8× | 7.3× | 13.8% | — | 21.9% | 20.4% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,736 |
| EPD | $84.7B | — | 12.6× | 1.6× | -6.4% | 26.7% | 11.0% | — | — | 3.7× | 1,573 |
| EOG | $80.7B | 16.3× | 7.9× | 3.6× | -4.5% | — | 22.0% | 16.7% | 13.2% | 0.7× | 1,525 |
| SLB | $79.7B | 22.7× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 1,624 |
| ET | $74.0B | — | 9.9× | 0.9× | 3.5% | 25.8% | 5.2% | 9.0% | 3.8% | 4.8× | 1,244 |
| KMI | $68.9B | 22.6× | 14.1× | 4.1× | 12.2% | — | 18.0% | 9.8% | 4.8% | 4.5× | 1,745 |
| TRGP | $61.7B | 33.8× | 16.3× | 3.6× | 3.9% | 38.3% | 11.3% | 62.7% | 9.4% | 3.6× | 979 |
| OKE | $61.1B | 17.9× | 12.8× | 1.8× | 55.0% | 30.5% | 10.1% | 15.1% | 6.3% | 4.4× | 1,622 |
| OXY | $60.9B | 38.4× | — | 2.8× | -1.9% | — | 11.0% | 6.6% | 4.2% | — | 1,250 |
| LNG | $60.3B | 11.4× | 7.8× | 3.0× | 27.2% | — | 26.7% | 67.3% | 17.3% | 2.2× | 1,303 |
| MPLX | $59.7B | — | — | 4.6× | 8.9% | — | 38.1% | — | — | — | 622 |
| TS | $59.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 248 |
| FANG | $58.5B | 35.9× | 11.6× | 3.9× | 35.8% | — | 11.1% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 2.3× | 1,141 |
| BKR | $56.4B | — | — | 2.0× | -0.3% | — | 9.3% | 13.7% | 13.3% | — | 1,095 |
| NGL | $2.2B | — | 14.8× | 0.7× | -9.0% | 30.9% | -4.5% | — | — | 8.9× | 102 |
Peers = companies sharing NGL's sector (Energy) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-09-14
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 91.9 | 87.1 | 86.0 | 89.8 | 82.6 | 76.7 | 72.3 | 69.1 |
| SG&A | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| Operating Income | 1.5 | -0.0 | -7.5 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 9.5 | 3.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
| Net Income | 4.1 | -5.2 | -12.2 | -2.3 | 0.9 | -3.5 | 1.1 | -4.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NGL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.