Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 294 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $77.11 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.8%/yr for a decade (off $219M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.8% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt -$78M
mean 22.5% · volatility σ 61% · implied rate exceeded in 6/9 yrs
Central path = implied 0.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (61%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.17B 100.0% | $1.20B 100.0% | $1.22B 100.0% | $1.67B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.22B 100.0% | $1.29B 100.0% | $1.13B 100.0% | $972.4M 100.0% | $908.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $706.1M 60.5% | $735.3M 61.3% | $770.5M 63.4% | $1.10B 65.8% | $878.7M 63.1% | $750.6M 61.7% | $810.9M 62.7% | $716.8M 63.2% | $643.4M 66.2% | $633.9M 69.8% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $643.4M 66.2% | $633.9M 69.8% |
| Gross Profit | $461.5M 39.5% | $464.8M 38.7% | $445.0M 36.6% | $570.1M 34.2% | $512.8M 36.9% | $465.5M 38.3% | $482.0M 37.3% | $416.8M 36.8% | $329.0M 33.8% | $274.4M 30.2% |
| Research & Development | $28.4M 2.4% | $24.5M 2.0% | $25.4M 2.1% | $30.3M 1.8% | $26.3M 1.9% | $22.6M 1.9% | $19.7M 1.5% | $21.5M 1.9% | $19.8M 2.0% | $17.6M 1.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $171.2M 14.7% | $157.8M 13.1% | $161.8M 13.3% | $198.8M 11.9% | $179.3M 12.9% | $149.4M 12.3% | $163.1M 12.6% | $132.4M 11.7% | $106.4M 10.9% | $96.4M 10.6% |
| Operating Income | $418.7M 35.9% | $425.9M 35.5% | $423.2M 34.8% | $452.6M 27.1% | $422.2M 30.3% | $397.9M 32.7% | $396.9M 30.7% | $320.5M 28.3% | $242.7M 25.0% | $163.6M 18.0% |
| Interest Expense | $78.3M 6.7% | $97.8M 8.1% | $93.3M 7.7% | $61.8M 3.7% | $51.7M 3.7% | $47.1M 3.9% | $54.6M 4.2% | $33.2M 2.9% | $18.1M 1.9% | $19.3M 2.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $5.2M 0.4% | $7.7M 0.6% | $6.3M 0.5% | $7.5M 0.4% | $4.0M 0.3% | $4.9M 0.4% | $7.7M 0.6% | $3.4M 0.3% | $2.3M 0.2% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$25.0M -2.1% | -$7.9M -0.7% | $16.2M 1.3% | $1.7M 0.1% | -$79.9M -5.7% | $4.1M 0.3% | $4.3M 0.3% | -$1.0M -0.1% | -$500K -0.1% | $3.2M 0.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$142.1M -12.2% | -$140.5M -11.7% | $130.0M 10.7% | $269.6M 16.2% | $162.8M 11.7% | $235.1M 19.3% | $227.9M 17.6% | $221.8M 19.6% | $174.8M 18.0% | $87.0M 9.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $8.2M 0.7% | -$19.1M -1.6% | $24.2M 2.0% | $58.0M 3.5% | $44.7M 3.2% | $53.7M 4.4% | $44.2M 3.4% | $40.0M 3.5% | $29.6M 3.0% | $42.6M 4.7% |
| Net Income | -$167.1M -14.3% | -$430.3M -35.9% | -$5.4M -0.4% | $211.6M 12.7% | $118.1M 8.5% | $181.4M 14.9% | $183.7M 14.2% | $169.1M 14.9% | $126.5M 13.0% | $35.2M 3.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-4.61 | $-11.85 | $-0.15 | $5.54 | $2.97 | $4.39 | $4.39 | $4.02 | $3.00 | $0.83 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-4.61 | $-11.85 | $-0.15 | $5.50 | $2.95 | $4.37 | $4.35 | $3.97 | $2.97 | $0.83 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 36.2M | 36.3M | 36.5M | 38.2M | 39.8M | 41.3M | 41.8M | 42.0M | 42.1M | 42.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 36.2M | 36.3M | 36.7M | 38.5M | 40.1M | 41.5M | 42.2M | 42.6M | 42.5M | 42.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $56M buybacks = $56M returned on $330M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: -563%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable.
Cash of $78M fully covers short-term debt of $47M.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 10-yr range · 67th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 10-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 63.2 | 62.7 | 61.7 | 63.1 | 65.8 | 63.4 | 61.3 | 60.5 |
| Gross Profit | 36.8 | 37.3 | 38.3 | 36.9 | 34.2 | 36.6 | 38.7 | 39.5 |
| R&D | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| SG&A | 11.7 | 12.6 | 12.3 | 12.9 | 11.9 | 13.3 | 13.1 | 14.7 |
| Operating Income | 28.3 | 30.7 | 32.7 | 30.3 | 27.1 | 34.8 | 35.5 | 35.9 |
| Income Tax | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 2.0 | -1.6 | 0.7 |
| Net Income | 14.9 | 14.2 | 14.9 | 8.5 | 12.7 | -0.4 | -35.9 | -14.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NGVT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| NGVT | $2.7B | — | 5.1× | 2.3× | -2.7% | 39.5% | -14.3% | -563% | -563% | — | 294 |
Peers = companies sharing NGVT's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.