Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 311 of 5,944 reporting institutions (94th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| NOVTU | $2.3B | 43.8× | 13.7× | 2.3× | 3.3% | 44.4% | 5.5% | 4.1% | 3.5% | 1.4× | 311 |
Peers = companies sharing NOVTU's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 4%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $381M covers all $50M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2012-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $381M fully covers short-term debt of $38M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $980.6M 100.0% | $949.2M 100.0% | $881.7M 100.0% | $860.9M 100.0% | $706.8M 100.0% | $590.6M 100.0% | $626.1M 100.0% | $614.3M 100.0% | $521.3M 100.0% | $384.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $545.3M 55.6% | $527.7M 55.6% | $481.8M 54.6% | $482.4M 56.0% | $406.5M 57.5% | $346.1M 58.6% | $364.0M 58.1% | $352.8M 57.4% | $300.8M 57.7% | $222.3M 57.8% |
| Gross Profit | $435.3M 44.4% | $421.5M 44.4% | $399.9M 45.4% | $378.5M 44.0% | $300.3M 42.5% | $244.5M 41.4% | $262.1M 41.9% | $261.5M 42.6% | $220.5M 42.3% | $162.5M 42.2% |
| Research & Development | $95.5M 9.7% | $95.5M 10.1% | $91.7M 10.4% | $85.8M 10.0% | $72.5M 10.3% | $61.0M 10.3% | $56.0M 8.9% | $51.0M 8.3% | $41.7M 8.0% | $32.0M 8.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $195.7M 20.0% | $175.9M 18.5% | $164.5M 18.7% | $158.9M 18.5% | $129.2M 18.3% | $109.9M 18.6% | $118.4M 18.9% | $115.9M 18.9% | $101.7M 19.5% | $81.3M 21.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $341.3M 34.8% | $311.0M 32.8% | $289.4M 32.8% | $275.4M 32.0% | $236.3M 33.4% | $188.6M 31.9% | $206.8M 33.0% | $190.5M 31.0% | $163.0M 31.3% | $129.5M 33.7% |
| Operating Income | $94.0M 9.6% | $110.6M 11.6% | $110.5M 12.5% | $103.1M 12.0% | $64.1M 9.1% | $55.9M 9.5% | $55.3M 8.8% | $71.0M 11.6% | $57.6M 11.0% | $33.0M 8.6% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$708K -0.1% | -$442K -0.0% | -$675K -0.1% | -$371K -0.0% | -$368K -0.1% | $21K 0.0% | -$243K -0.0% | -$44K -0.0% | -$229K -0.0% | $1.8M 0.5% |
| Pretax Income | $69.6M 7.1% | $79.1M 8.3% | $83.7M 9.5% | $87.2M 10.1% | $56.2M 7.9% | $48.4M 8.2% | $45.8M 7.3% | $61.3M 10.0% | $76.1M 14.6% | $32.5M 8.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $15.8M 1.6% | $15.0M 1.6% | $10.9M 1.2% | $13.1M 1.5% | $5.8M 0.8% | $3.9M 0.7% | $5.0M 0.8% | $10.2M 1.7% | $13.8M 2.7% | $10.5M 2.7% |
| Net Income | $53.8M 5.5% | $64.1M 6.8% | $72.9M 8.3% | $74.1M 8.6% | $50.3M 7.1% | $44.5M 7.5% | $40.8M 6.5% | $49.1M 8.0% | $60.1M 11.5% | $22.0M 5.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.47 | $1.78 | $2.03 | $2.08 | $1.42 | $1.27 | $1.16 | $1.46 | $1.14 | $0.63 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.47 | $1.77 | $2.02 | $2.06 | $1.41 | $1.25 | $1.15 | $1.43 | $1.13 | $0.63 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 36.6M | 36.0M | 35.8M | 35.7M | 35.4M | 35.1M | 35.0M | 34.9M | 34.8M | 34.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 36.7M | 36.1M | 36.0M | 35.9M | 35.8M | 35.7M | 35.5M | 35.5M | 35.3M | 34.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $64.40 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.0%/yr for a decade (off $97M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares · net debt -$168M
mean 18.0% · volatility σ 63% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 9.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (63%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $39M buybacks = $39M returned on $48M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 2 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 57.4 | 58.1 | 58.6 | 57.5 | 56.0 | 54.6 | 55.6 | 55.6 |
| Gross Profit | 42.6 | 41.9 | 41.4 | 42.5 | 44.0 | 45.4 | 44.4 | 44.4 |
| R&D | 8.3 | 8.9 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 10.0 | 10.4 | 10.1 | 9.7 |
| SG&A | 18.9 | 18.9 | 18.6 | 18.3 | 18.5 | 18.7 | 18.5 | 20.0 |
| Operating Income | 11.6 | 8.8 | 9.5 | 9.1 | 12.0 | 12.5 | 11.6 | 9.6 |
| Income Tax | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Net Income | 8.0 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 5.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NOVTU: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.