Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$1.1M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 6 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: -16%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 6 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2021
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1M 100.0% | $137K 100.0% | $12.0M 100.0% | $0 | $0 | $1.4M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $3.2M 101.8% | $3.3M 2446.4% | $3.5M 29.6% | $4.4M | $5.0M | $5.6M 390.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $6.2M 197.5% | $6.2M 4564.0% | $8.0M 66.6% | $7.3M | $8.7M | $9.7M 670.1% |
| Interest Expense | $38K 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$68K -2.2% | $77K 56.5% | -$269K -2.2% | $311K | -$166K | -$474K -32.8% |
| Pretax Income | -$3.1M -99.7% | -$6.0M -4414.1% | $3.8M 31.7% | -$7.0M | -$8.9M | -$8.7M -602.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 | $76K | $375K 25.9% |
| Net Income | -$3.1M -99.7% | -$6.0M -4414.1% | $3.8M 31.7% | -$7.0M | — | — |
| Per Share | ||||||
| EPS (Basic) | -$0.05 | -$0.09 | $0.06 | -$0.11 | -$0.16 | -$0.17 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -$0.05 | -$0.09 | $0.06 | -$0.11 | -$0.16 | -$0.17 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 64.7M | 64.4M | 68.2M | 65.5M | 54.5M | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 64.7M | 64.4M | 68.2M | 65.5M | 54.5M | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $2.3M is below the $4.5M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-12-31 (20-F). The cash figure is from 2021-12-31, so the two are not the same balance-sheet date — the schedule has not been refiled since.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~3.8% on $1.0M of debt.
Cash of $2.3M fully covers short-term debt of $65K.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 25 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLB | $79.4B | 22.9× | — | 2.2× | -1.6% | — | 9.4% | 12.9% | 9.4% | — | 515 |
| HAL | $29.7B | — | 10.2× | 1.3× | -3.3% | — | 5.8% | 12.3% | 7.3% | 1.5× | 319 |
| NE | $7.6B | 35.1× | — | 2.3× | 7.4% | — | 6.6% | 4.8% | 3.3% | — | — |
| RIG | $7.5B | — | — | 1.9× | 12.5% | 39.3% | -73.5% | -36.0% | -21.2% | — | 111 |
| VAL | $7.1B | 7.3× | 12.1× | 3.0× | 0.3% | 31.2% | 41.5% | 31.0% | 23.1% | 0.8× | — |
| HP | $4.2B | — | 9.6× | 1.1× | 35.9% | — | -4.4% | -5.8% | -3.3% | 3.0× | 80 |
| OII | $4.1B | 11.9× | 9.7× | 1.5× | 4.6% | 20.4% | 12.7% | 33.0% | 22.7% | -0.5× | 70 |
| SDRL | $3.2B | — | 12.3× | 2.3× | 3.8% | — | -5.4% | -2.7% | -2.2% | 1.0× | — |
| LBRT | $2.8B | 19.6× | 5.3× | 0.7× | -7.2% | 20.9% | 3.7% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 0.4× | 56 |
| WTTR | $2.6B | — | 84.0× | 1.8× | -3.1% | 14.4% | 1.5% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 8.7× | 52 |
| NESR | $2.2B | 41.2× | 9.5× | 1.6× | 1.7% | 12.4% | 3.9% | 5.3% | 4.2% | 0.5× | 29 |
| XPRO | $1.9B | 38.6× | 6.7× | 1.2× | -6.2% | — | 3.2% | 3.4% | 3.2% | -0.4× | 1 |
| WBI | $1.7B | — | 14.0× | 3.2× | 66.2% | 27.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.3× | 21 |
| HLX | $1.6B | 50.5× | 5.8× | 1.2× | -4.9% | 12.3% | 2.4% | 2.0% | 1.6% | -0.4× | 46 |
| RES | $1.4B | 42.5× | 5.8× | 0.9× | 15.0% | 24.2% | 2.0% | 2.9% | 2.9% | -1.0× | 42 |
| HPK | $1.3B | 74.6× | 4.1× | 1.5× | -22.7% | — | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.7% | 1.8× | 28 |
| BORR | $1.3B | 23.9× | 6.4× | 1.2× | 1.0% | — | 4.4% | 3.7% | 1.3% | 3.8× | 29 |
| PUMP | $967M | — | 5.4× | 0.8× | -12.1% | — | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1× | 32 |
| ACDC | $883M | — | 9.9× | 0.5× | -11.4% | — | -19.0% | -51.4% | -21.2% | 5.2× | 16 |
| CLB | $477M | 16.5× | 7.9× | 0.9× | 0.5% | 20.7% | 5.6% | 11.2% | 7.9% | 1.2× | 24 |
| NGS | $424M | 20.9× | 5.7× | 2.5× | 9.9% | — | 11.6% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 0.0× | 21 |
| RNGR | $361M | 28.2× | 5.8× | 0.7× | -4.2% | — | 2.2% | 4.1% | 4.1% | -0.1× | 20 |
| TUSK | $140M | 29.1× | — | 3.2× | -2.9% | — | 10.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% | — | 7 |
| NCSM | $140M | 6.2× | 6.8× | 0.8× | 13.0% | — | 12.9% | 18.8% | 17.7% | -1.8× | — |
| KLXE | $123M | — | 5.7× | 0.2× | -10.2% | 21.2% | -12.1% | 104% | -42.5% | 3.9× | 3 |
| NSFDF | $33M | — | — | 10.7× | — | — | -99.7% | -17.2% | -16.3% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing NSFDF's sector (Oil & Gas Field Exploration Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
The same 1 year as the 3-yr average, with the stock compensation of those years charged as a cost. Shares issued to employees are real dilution, so this asks what the business generates for existing holders.
To be worth $0.28 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -2.1%/yr for a decade (off $3.9M on the SBC-adjusted basis).
On the basis ($4.0M) the requirement is -2.2%/yr. The difference is what charging stock compensation costs.
Default is 11.7% — this company's computed cost of capital (computed WACC), the same rate the Analysis tab discounts at.
2-stage DCF · 0.12B shares (market data) · net debt -$1.3M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 26th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2021 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE -17% against ROIC -16% — -1% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
Equity is the year-end figure. On average equity over the two year-ends, ROE is -16.0% — the two diverge when buybacks or issuance move equity during the year.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 390.1 | — | — | 29.6 | 2446.4 | 101.8 |
| Income Tax | 25.9 | — | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | — | — | — | 31.7 | -4414.1 | -99.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NSFDF: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | not reported | -570.1% | not reported |
| FY2019 | not reported | not reported | 31.7% |
| FY2020 | not reported | not reported | -4414.1% |
| FY2021 | not reported | not reported | -99.7% |
Return on equity (-17%) and return on invested capital (-16%) are within a couple of points in FY2021, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
Debt is present but there is no positive EBITDA or no reported interest expense, so coverage cannot be measured.
This schedule comes from a filing dated 2024-12-31, 669 days old. Maturities are shown relative to that date, not to today.
Ladder as of 2024-12-31 (20-F); cash from the 2021-12-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2021. Free cash flow is negative, so projected resources fall rather than accumulate.
Balance sheet at 2021-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: ebitda.
At $0.28, free cash flow must compound -1.8%/yr for 10 years. It has no positive compounding record after stock compensation to compare against.
This is solved on free cash flow AFTER stock compensation ($4M against $4M before it). On the unadjusted figure the requirement would be -1.97%/yr. Which is right depends on whether you think the share issuance is a recurring cost of running the business.