Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +0.62% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -296%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| NTRP | $24M | — | — | 6.4× | 641% | 17.6% | -428% | -296% | -296% | — | 15 |
Peers = companies sharing NTRP's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 15 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7M 100.0% | $501K 100.0% | $459K 100.0% | $383K 100.0% | $630K 100.0% | $1.7M 100.0% | $807K 100.0% | $402K 100.0% | $389K 100.0% | $641K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.1M 82.4% | $498K 99.3% | $398K 86.7% | $355K 92.7% | $350K 55.5% | $560K 33.9% | $592K 73.3% | $574K 142.7% | $270K 69.5% | $272K 42.5% |
| Gross Profit | $652K 17.6% | $3K 0.7% | $61K 13.3% | $28K 7.3% | $280K 44.5% | $1.1M 66.1% | $216K 26.7% | -$172K -42.7% | $118K 30.5% | $369K 57.5% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | $405K 64.2% | $418K 25.3% | $126K 15.6% | $648K 161.0% | $493K 127.0% | $302K 47.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $203K 5.5% | $95K 19.0% | $152K 33.2% | $210K 54.7% | $915K 145.1% | $734K 44.5% | $417K 51.6% | $748K 185.8% | $467K 120.1% | $325K 50.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $17.0M 458.0% | $7.4M 1479.1% | $5.7M 1251.3% | $5.0M 1300.8% | $9.0M 1432.3% | $9.6M 579.5% | $5.9M 732.4% | $6.2M 1543.5% | $5.7M 1463.6% | $4.3M 665.7% |
| Operating Income | -$16.4M -440.5% | -$7.4M -1478.5% | -$5.7M -1238.0% | -$5.0M -1293.5% | -$8.7M -1387.8% | -$8.5M -513.4% | -$5.7M -705.7% | -$6.4M -1586.2% | -$5.6M -1433.1% | -$3.9M -608.2% |
| Interest Expense | — | $0 0.0% | $234K 51.1% | $72K 18.9% | $7K 1.2% | $11K 0.7% | $14K 1.7% | $9K 2.2% | — | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | $3K 0.6% | $14K 0.8% | $1K 0.1% | $19K 4.7% | $35K 9.1% | $40K 6.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $465K 12.5% | -$2.7M -540.0% | -$977K -213.1% | -$82K -21.3% | $57K 9.0% | $1.1M 66.3% | $499K 61.8% | $63K 15.6% | -$5K -1.4% | -$526K -82.0% |
| Pretax Income | -$15.9M -428.0% | -$10.1M -2018.5% | -$6.7M -1451.1% | -$5.0M -1314.8% | -$8.7M -1378.8% | -$7.4M -447.1% | -$5.2M -644.0% | -$6.3M -1570.6% | -$5.6M -1434.5% | -$4.4M -690.2% |
| Net Income | -$15.9M -428.3% | -$10.1M -2018.3% | -$7.3M -1598.3% | -$5.0M -1314.8% | -$8.7M -1378.8% | -$7.4M -447.1% | -$5.2M -644.0% | -$6.3M -1570.6% | -$5.6M -1434.5% | -$4.4M -690.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.82 | $-2.23 | $-32.12 | $-70.32 | $-0.83 | $-0.76 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.82 | $-2.23 | $-32.12 | $-70.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 8.9M | 4.6M | 228K | 72K | 10.5M | 9.8M | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 8.9M | 4.6M | 228K | 72K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 4th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 142.7 | 73.3 | 33.9 | 55.5 | 92.7 | 86.7 | 99.3 | 82.4 |
| Gross Profit | -42.7 | 26.7 | 66.1 | 44.5 | 7.3 | 13.3 | 0.7 | 17.6 |
| R&D | 161.0 | 15.6 | 25.3 | 64.2 | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 185.8 | 51.6 | 44.5 | 145.1 | 54.7 | 33.2 | 19.0 | 5.5 |
| Operating Income | -1586.2 | -705.7 | -513.4 | -1387.8 | -1293.5 | -1238.0 | -1478.5 | -440.5 |
| Net Income | -1570.6 | -644.0 | -447.1 | -1378.8 | -1314.8 | -1598.3 | -2018.3 | -428.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NTRP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.