Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 73%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $0 is below the $215K due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2017-01-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 24 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VREOF | $413M | — | 20.7× | 1.5× | 170% | 47.3% | -25.3% | -22.2% | -22.2% | -6.8× | — |
| AUTL | $405M | — | — | 5.4× | 645% | -27.8% | -381% | -161% | -161% | — | 10 |
| TLRY | $390M | — | — | 0.4× | 11.5% | 28.4% | -13.3% | -7.5% | -7.0% | — | 55 |
| EBS | $349M | 7.3× | 3.6× | 0.5× | -28.8% | 56.1% | 7.1% | 10.1% | 4.8% | 1.9× | 29 |
| USNA | $265M | 24.7× | 1.5× | 0.3× | 8.3% | 78.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | 2.0% | -2.3× | 18 |
| QTTB | $264M | 3.7× | 12.5× | 4.9× | — | — | 55.5% | 71.0% | 71.0% | -2.8× | 3 |
| ELTP | $248M | 7.7× | 4.3× | 1.7× | 77.1% | 50.4% | 30.1% | 45.4% | 45.4% | -0.6× | — |
| SIGA | $228M | 9.9× | 3.0× | 2.4× | -31.8% | 68.6% | 24.6% | 11.7% | 11.7% | -6.4× | 25 |
| PYXS | $226M | — | — | 16.3× | -14.2% | 82.8% | -575% | -149% | -149% | — | 10 |
| NATR | $216M | 11.6× | 3.1× | 0.5× | 5.7% | 72.4% | 4.1% | 12.1% | 12.1% | -2.4× | 19 |
| CRLBF | $212M | — | 28.1× | 0.3× | -9.5% | 49.5% | -20.6% | -39.8% | -17.6% | 17.9× | 3 |
| PLX | $210M | — | — | 4.0× | -1.2% | 48.8% | -12.5% | -13.7% | -13.7% | — | 14 |
| GLAS | $205M | — | — | 1.1× | -9.4% | 42.3% | -16.3% | -40.1% | -20.8% | — | — |
| AKBA | $196M | — | 2.4× | 0.8× | 47.5% | 83.3% | -2.3% | -16.4% | -6.6% | -5.5× | 27 |
| WHWK | $188M | — | — | 26.3× | -72.5% | 89.4% | -288% | -15.1% | -15.1% | — | 10 |
| CGEN | $188M | 5.2× | 3.0× | 2.6× | 161% | 87.3% | 48.6% | 34.4% | 34.4% | -2.9× | 12 |
| NAGE | $184M | 11.7× | 10.9× | 1.4× | 29.9% | 64.3% | 13.4% | 22.7% | 22.7% | 0.0× | 15 |
| MGNX | $153M | — | — | 1.0× | -0.3% | 100% | -49.9% | -134% | -134% | — | 18 |
| NNNN | $147M | 22.9× | — | 17.1× | 5.6% | 87.2% | 74.1% | 21.2% | 21.2% | — | 1 |
| DERM | $146M | — | — | 2.4× | 10.2% | 66.2% | -18.5% | -35.9% | -20.0% | — | 4 |
| CHRS | $128M | 0.6× | — | 3.0× | 59.8% | 67.2% | — | 275% | 275% | — | 21 |
| BGM | $127M | — | — | 3.4× | 51.1% | 16.6% | -52.6% | -5.1% | -5.1% | — | — |
| VXRT | $102M | 6.0× | 1.8× | 0.4× | 727% | — | 6.9% | 18.6% | 18.6% | -3.0× | 2 |
| BDTX | $102M | 4.6× | 6.3× | 1.5× | — | — | 32.0% | 19.9% | 19.9% | -1.6× | 16 |
| NTRR | $291790 | — | — | 4.3× | -26.1% | 51.9% | -826% | 72.6% | 72.6% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing NTRR's sector (Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a company with no positive EBITDA.
No positive EBITDA in the recent record, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost. Equity is negative, so debt/equity and ROE invert their signs and read as the opposite of what they mean.
Classified from the filings: EBITDA negative in each of the last 2 years.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2023
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 | FY2015 | FY2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $68K 100.0% | $92K 100.0% | $10K 100.0% | $6K 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cost of Revenue | $33K 48.1% | $61K 66.1% | $43K 443.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | $35K 51.9% | $31K 33.9% | -$33K -343.3% | $6K 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Selling, General & Admin | $228K 335.3% | $508K 552.6% | $415K 4281.4% | $401K 6264.9% | $1.7M | $164K | $371K | $1.0M | $636K | $966K |
| Operating Income | -$298K -437.8% | -$584K -634.2% | -$479K -4941.3% | -$394K -6164.9% | -$1.7M | -$164K | -$371K | -$1.0M | -$636K | -$966K |
| Interest Expense | $62K 91.3% | $61K 65.9% | $122K 1255.8% | $341K 5327.6% | $721K | $355K | $497K | $402K | $1.2M | $292K |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$260K -382.7% | -$49K -53.6% | -$60K -621.7% | -$301K -4712.7% | -$720K | -$355K | -$497K | -$407K | -$1.3M | — |
| Pretax Income | -$558K -820.5% | -$633K -687.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Income Tax Expense | $4K 5.2% | — | $4K 36.4% | $0 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | -$561K -825.7% | -$633K -687.9% | -$539K -5563.0% | -$696K -10877.6% | -$2.4M | -$519K | -$868K | -$1.4M | -$1.9M | -$1.3M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2023 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 73% against ROIC 73% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.9× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2016 | FY2017 | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | 443.3 | 66.1 | 48.1 |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | 100.0 | -343.3 | 33.9 | 51.9 |
| SG&A | — | — | — | — | 6264.9 | 4281.4 | 552.6 | 335.3 |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | — | -6164.9 | -4941.3 | -634.2 | -437.8 |
| Income Tax | — | — | — | — | 0.0 | 36.4 | — | 5.2 |
| Net Income | — | — | — | — | -10877.6 | -5563.0 | -687.9 | -825.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on NTRR: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | 100.0% | -6164.9% | -10877.6% |
| FY2021 | -343.3% | -4941.3% | -5563.0% |
| FY2022 | 33.9% | -634.2% | -687.9% |
| FY2023 | 51.9% | -437.8% | -825.7% |
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: tax_rate.
Fewer than three profitable years with a cash flow statement, so cash conversion cannot be judged.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: FCF / net income over 3 and 5 years, Sloan accruals, SBC as a share of revenue, SBC as a share of operating cash flow, SBC-adjusted free cash flow, free cash flow per diluted share, buybacks against SBC issued, capex vs depreciation, free cash flow against revenue, share count since the first year on file, cash conversion cycle (DSO, DIO, DPO), receivables growth against revenue growth.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: 3 years of cash flow.
No debt, so there is no leverage path to distress.
This schedule comes from a filing dated 2017-01-31, 3560 days old. Maturities are shown relative to that date, not to today.
Ladder as of 2017-01-31 (10-K); cash from the 2017-01-31 balance sheet; FCF from FY2017.
Balance sheet at 2017-01-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage, stressed coverage, maturity schedule vs cash and one year of FCF, liquidity ratios.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.