Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
No institutional (13F) filings cover this company, so the Overview and 13F tabs are thin. Everything drawn from its SEC filings is here.
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading analysis...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Ranked against 32 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-09-30.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBRE | $37.1B | 33.5× | — | 0.9× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 275 |
| BEKE | $19.4B | 147.6× | 42.0× | 1.4× | 5.6% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.5% | -2.5× | 39 |
| JLL | $16.4B | 21.9× | 12.3× | 0.6× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 10.4% | -0.4× | 168 |
| INVH | $15.5B | 27.7× | — | 5.7× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 133 |
| TRNO | $7.1B | 16.8× | — | 15.0× | 24.5% | — | 84.6% | 9.7% | 7.9% | — | 72 |
| COMP | $6.9B | — | 136.1× | 1.0× | 23.7% | — | -0.8% | -7.5% | -7.5% | -4.0× | 78 |
| FSV | $6.3B | 45.7× | 13.9× | 1.1× | 5.4% | — | 3.5% | 13.9% | 7.8% | 1.8× | 47 |
| CIGI | $4.9B | 47.9× | 10.2× | 0.9× | 15.3% | — | 4.0% | 14.6% | 7.1% | 2.3× | 21 |
| JOE | $4.0B | 35.2× | 21.8× | 7.7× | 27.4% | 43.1% | 22.5% | 15.1% | 10.0% | 1.4× | 72 |
| CURB | $3.5B | 77.1× | — | 18.9× | 51.3% | — | 21.8% | 2.1% | 1.7% | — | 48 |
| CWK | $3.1B | 35.0× | 9.1× | 0.3× | 8.9% | — | 0.9% | 4.5% | 1.9% | 3.5× | 3 |
| UE | $2.5B | 26.9× | — | 5.3× | 6.1% | — | 19.8% | 6.8% | 6.8% | — | 45 |
| NMRK | $2.1B | 16.9× | 9.0× | 0.6× | 20.3% | — | 3.8% | 8.6% | 5.9% | 1.6× | 58 |
| GTY | $1.9B | 20.7× | — | 8.5× | 9.0% | — | 35.7% | 7.4% | 3.8% | — | 66 |
| OPEN | $1.7B | — | — | 0.4× | -15.2% | 8.0% | -29.7% | -129% | -129% | — | 66 |
| IIPR | $1.4B | 13.2× | 9.0× | 5.4× | -13.8% | — | 44.5% | 6.4% | 5.3% | 1.8× | 68 |
| FOR | $1.2B | 7.3× | — | 0.7× | 10.1% | 21.9% | 10.1% | 9.5% | 6.5% | — | 29 |
| AGNT | $648M | — | — | 0.1× | 4.5% | 7.0% | -0.5% | -9.4% | -9.4% | — | — |
| HPP | $572M | — | 1.3× | 0.7× | -1.3% | 48.5% | -71.3% | -19.9% | -19.9% | -0.4× | 32 |
| GOOD | $553M | 81.6× | — | 3.4× | 8.0% | — | 12.0% | 11.2% | 1.9% | — | 47 |
| REAX | $508M | — | — | 0.3× | 55.7% | 8.4% | -0.4% | -15.7% | -15.7% | — | — |
| AHRT | $454M | — | 14.0× | 2.2× | 2.7% | — | 2.7% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 10.3× | 43 |
| TRC | $443M | — | — | 8.9× | 18.4% | 29.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 26 |
| SKYH | $391M | 109.9× | — | 14.2× | 86.6% | — | 68.3% | 10.9% | 5.2% | — | 17 |
| BOC | $369M | — | 30.7× | 3.2× | 5.6% | 65.8% | -10.9% | -2.4% | -2.2% | 2.5× | 21 |
| PETZ | $13M | 7.3× | — | 10.2× | 122% | -0.9% | — | 5.9% | 5.9% | — | — |
Peers = companies sharing PETZ's sector (Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
A reverse discounted cash flow is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$2.0M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: 6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Dividends and buybacks are cash paid out, shown here against the same year's profit for scale — not funded from it.
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M 100.0% | $564K 100.0% | $754 100.0% | $25K 100.0% | $1.1M 100.0% | $623K 100.0% | $12.6M 100.0% | $23.7M 100.0% | $29.0M 100.0% | $24.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.3M 100.9% | $325K 57.7% | $976 129.4% | $106K 426.9% | $770K 71.2% | $450K 72.2% | $14.2M 112.0% | $27.7M 117.1% | $20.7M 71.4% | $17.4M 71.1% |
| Gross Profit | -$12K -0.9% | $238K 42.3% | -$222 -29.4% | -$81K -326.9% | $311K 28.8% | $173K 27.8% | -$1.5M -12.0% | -$4.1M -17.1% | $8.3M 28.6% | $7.1M 28.9% |
| Research & Development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.1M 4.5% | $1.1M 3.6% | $1.1M 4.4% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.8M 141.4% | $1.7M 309.6% | $3.1M 417145.9% | $3.0M 11940.3% | $3.5M 327.6% | $584K 93.7% | $3.7M 29.3% | $2.8M 11.8% | $2.1M 7.2% | $1.4M 5.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.8M 145.4% | $2.1M 367.4% | $6.2M 820331.8% | $3.0M 11968.5% | $4.0M 367.4% | $669K 107.5% | $5.4M 43.0% | $10.0M 42.2% | $8.0M 27.7% | $5.9M 24.2% |
| Operating Income | -$1.8M -146.3% | -$1.8M -325.1% | -$6.2M -820361.3% | -$3.0M -12295.4% | -$3.7M -338.6% | -$496K -79.7% | -$7.0M -55.0% | -$14.0M -59.3% | $267K 0.9% | $1.2M 4.7% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $14K 1893.4% | -$43K -174.2% | $15K 1.3% | $1.2M 189.5% | $1.4M 10.9% | $233K 1.0% | $83K 0.3% | $102K 0.4% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | $860K 3478.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $3.6M 288.7% | $3.8M 666.7% | -$2.2M -291431.2% | $4.2M 16916.6% | -$410K -37.9% | $2.2M 351.0% | -$1.7M -13.2% | -$175K -0.7% | -$207K -0.7% | -$52K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $1.8M 142.3% | $1.9M 341.6% | -$8.4M -1111792.4% | $1.1M 4621.2% | -$4.1M -376.5% | $1.7M 271.3% | -$8.6M -68.2% | -$14.2M -60.1% | $60K 0.2% | $1.1M 4.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | — | $182 0.0% | — | — | — | -$900 -0.1% | — | — | -$55K -0.2% | $90K 0.4% |
| Net Income | $1.8M 143.8% | $2.7M 476.2% | -$23.6M -3133444.6% | $804K 3250.4% | -$6.1M -566.1% | -$875K -140.4% | -$8.6M -68.2% | -$14.2M -60.1% | $115K 0.4% | $1.0M 4.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.17 | $0.26 | -$2.29 | $0.10 | -$1.17 | -$0.38 | -$0.41 | -$1.49 | $0.01 | $0.13 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.17 | $0.26 | -$2.29 | $0.10 | -$1.17 | -$0.38 | -$0.41 | -$1.49 | $0.01 | $0.13 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 10.3M | 10.3M | 10.3M | 8.0M | 5.2M | 2.3M | 21.0M | 9.6M | 8.3M | 7.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 10.3M | 10.3M | 10.3M | 8.0M | 5.2M | 2.3M | 21.0M | 9.6M | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Leverage ratios is not shown for a REIT.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Classified from the filings: SIC code.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-10-30
Where each multiple sits in its own 9-yr range · 32th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 9-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
ROE 6% against ROIC 6% — 0% of the return on equity comes from leverage and buybacks rather than from the operating business.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
This shows debt/cash structure and net leverage. The year-by-year maturity schedule is on the Debt & Leverage tab.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 117.1 | 112.0 | 72.2 | 71.2 | 426.9 | 129.4 | 57.7 | 100.9 |
| Gross Profit | -17.1 | -12.0 | 27.8 | 28.8 | -326.9 | -29.4 | 42.3 | -0.9 |
| R&D | 4.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 11.8 | 29.3 | 93.7 | 327.6 | 11940.3 | 417145.9 | 309.6 | 141.4 |
| Operating Income | -59.3 | -55.0 | -79.7 | -338.6 | -12295.4 | -820361.3 | -325.1 | -146.3 |
| Income Tax | — | — | -0.1 | — | — | — | 0.0 | — |
| Net Income | -60.1 | -68.2 | -140.4 | -566.1 | 3250.4 | -3133444.6 | 476.2 | 143.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PETZ: price, valuation and headline fundamentals from SEC filings. The four questions at the top of the page are where the judgements live.
No positive operating income in the last three years, so there is no return on capital to compare against its cost.
| Fiscal year | Gross margin | Operating margin | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2016 | 28.9% | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| FY2017 | 28.6% | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| FY2018 | -17.1% | -59.3% | -60.1% |
| FY2019 | -12.0% | -55.0% | -68.2% |
| FY2020 | 27.8% | -79.7% | -140.4% |
| FY2021 | 28.8% | -338.6% | -566.1% |
| FY2022 | -2.6% | -98.1% | 25.9% |
| FY2023 | -29.4% | -820361.3% | not reported |
| FY2024 | 42.3% | -325.1% | 476.2% |
| FY2025 | -0.9% | -146.3% | 143.8% |
Return on equity (6%) and return on invested capital (6%) are within a couple of points in FY2025, so the headline return is the operating return — there is no meaningful leverage effect to strip out.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: ROIC vs WACC spread, 5-year spread history, gross margin trend, operating margin trend, net margin against 3 years ago, revenue growth, ROIC ex-goodwill gap.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: positive EBIT.
Free cash flow has fallen short of reported profit in 3 of the last three years.
Accruals are positive and DSO is up +18 days over 3 years. Either alone is explainable; together they are revenue recognised ahead of collection.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: share_based_compensation.
Leverage is not measurable this way for a reit.
Balance sheet at 2025-12-31. Undrawn revolving credit is not shown: the tag is collected but not yet mapped through to the API.
Depreciation swamps reported earnings for a property owner — which is why FFO exists. EBITDA leverage and a net-income DCF both mislead here.
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: capital adequacy metrics for this archetype.
No positive free cash flow to discount, so the price cannot be expressed as a growth requirement.
No material counter-signal in the checked set: reverse-DCF implied growth, historical FCF CAGR, per-year FCF growth distribution, reporting-basis breaks, discount rate used, free-cash-flow basis (stock comp charged?).
Missing from our data, so excluded from this answer: free_cash_flow.
| Step | Amount | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Net income | $2M | $2M |
| Share-based comp | not reported | not reported |
| Other non-cash & working capital | −$4M | −$2M |
| Operating cash flow | −$2M | −$2M |
| Capex | −$244,088 | −$2M |
| Free cash flow | −$2M | −$2M |
| Fiscal year | Revenue growth | Receivables growth | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2020 | -95.1% | 678.0% | 773.1 points |
| FY2021 | 73.6% | -78.1% | -151.7 points |
| FY2022 | 186.6% | -20.4% | -207.0 points |
| FY2023 | -100.0% | -83.1% | 16.9 points |
| FY2024 | 74664.7% | 15.9% | -74648.9 points |
| FY2025 | 122.0% | 1210.8% | 1088.9 points |
| Fiscal year | DSO | DIO | DPO | Cash conversion cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2019 | 0.6 days | 12.2 days | 88.5 days | -75.7 days |
| FY2020 | 98.8 days | 200.7 days | 2605.2 days | -2305.8 days |
| FY2021 | 12.4 days | 24.4 days | 240.3 days | -203.5 days |
| FY2022 | 3.5 days | 3.4 days | 1700.8 days | -1693.9 days |
| FY2023 | 2401.5 days | not reported | 24675.6 days | -22274.1 days |
| FY2024 | 3.7 days | 6.4 days | 137.2 days | -127 days |
| FY2025 | 22 days | 21.8 days | 26 days | 17.7 days |
| Fiscal year | Accruals / assets |
|---|---|
| FY2019 | -19.9 percent |
| FY2020 | 7.0 percent |
| FY2021 | -8.8 percent |
| FY2022 | 7.9 percent |
| FY2023 | -79.8 percent |
| FY2024 | 8.8 percent |
| FY2025 | 8.9 percent |
Below the line, the asset base is being consumed faster than it is replaced.
Depreciation here includes amortisation of acquired intangibles — goodwill written down over time, customer lists, acquired technology. Capex does not replace those and is not meant to, so an acquisitive or asset-light company sits below 1.0 permanently and correctly. The signal is cleanest for capital-intensive businesses, where the two measure the same physical base. For that reason this informs the earnings-quality verdict but never caps it.