Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 228 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 5%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.1M 100.0% | $26.9M 100.0% | $13.4M 100.0% | $12.4M 100.0% | $7.3M 100.0% | $6.7M 100.0% | $8.9M 100.0% | $984.6M 100.0% | $955.5M 100.0% | $931.9M 100.0% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.50B 7435.4% | $1.19B 4439.1% | $1.22B 9087.7% | $1.32B 10656.1% | $1.81B 24685.0% | $1.46B 21745.4% | $948.0M 10675.2% | $716.9M 72.8% | $619.6M 64.8% | $548.8M 58.9% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $637.8M 4758.5% | $335.4M 2706.8% | $390.7M 5333.8% | $271.6M 4030.7% | $212.0M 2387.2% | $144.6M 14.7% | $144.5M 15.1% | $106.2M 11.4% |
| Pretax Income | $551.4M 2742.3% | $401.0M 1492.6% | $183.6M 1370.1% | $665.2M 5368.4% | $1.36B 18555.4% | $2.24B 33258.3% | $529.4M 5962.2% | $267.7M 27.2% | $335.9M 35.2% | $383.1M 41.1% |
| Income Tax Expense | $50.3M 250.3% | $89.6M 333.5% | $39.0M 290.8% | $189.7M 1531.1% | $355.7M 4855.9% | $593.7M 8812.9% | $136.5M 1536.9% | $23.3M 2.4% | $24.4M 2.6% | $46.1M 4.9% |
| Net Income | $501.0M 2491.5% | $311.0M 1157.5% | $145.0M 1081.8% | $476.0M 3841.2% | $1.00B 13651.9% | $1.65B 24445.4% | $393.0M 4425.3% | $87.7M 8.9% | $100.8M 10.5% | $66.1M 7.1% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $9.69 | $6.11 | $2.89 | $8.96 | $15.73 | $21.91 | $5.02 | $2.62 | $4.34 | $2.98 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $9.30 | $5.84 | $2.74 | $8.50 | $14.87 | $20.92 | $4.89 | $2.59 | $4.03 | $2.94 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 51.7M | 51.0M | 50.0M | 53.1M | 63.8M | 75.2M | 78.2M | 33.5M | 23.2M | 22.2M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 53.9M | 53.4M | 52.7M | 56.0M | 67.5M | 78.7M | 80.3M | 35.3M | 25.0M | 76.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
2/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $63M dividends + $5M buybacks = $67M returned on -$1.7B FCF.
2 consecutive years of dividend increases · 22%/yr.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~14.4% on $4.4B of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 878 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSAC | $6.64T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 141 |
| V | $688.1B | — | — | 17.2× | 11.3% | — | 50.1% | 52.9% | 34.9% | — | 4,229 |
| MA | $516.3B | 34.5× | — | 15.7× | 16.4% | — | 45.6% | 193% | 57.6% | — | 3,430 |
| HBCYF | $346.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| AXP | $239.4B | 22.7× | — | 5.8× | 6.4% | — | 26.2% | 32.4% | 11.9% | — | 2,787 |
| MBFJF | $239.1B | 0.1× | 0.1× | 0.0× | 9.5% | — | 14.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% | — | 1 |
| USOI | $195.8B | — | — | 9.8× | 30.7% | — | -20.3% | -10.7% | -1.9% | — | 13 |
| HDB | $182.5B | 22.9× | — | 7.1× | -98.6% | — | 30.8% | 8.8% | 4.5% | — | 570 |
| UBS | $179.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 660 |
| USML | $178.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| BLK | $175.8B | 32.1× | — | 7.3× | 89.3% | — | 22.9% | 9.9% | 8.1% | — | 2,196 |
| SMFNF | $158.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| CB | $137.9B | 13.7× | — | 2.3× | 6.5% | — | 17.4% | 14.0% | 11.3% | — | 2,002 |
| GLD | $131.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,072 |
| MZHOF | $129.2B | 0.1× | — | 0.0× | 7.6% | — | 13.2% | 10.7% | 3.7% | — | 2 |
| PGR | $124.7B | 11.1× | — | 1.4× | 16.3% | — | 12.9% | 37.3% | 30.4% | — | 1,685 |
| SPGI | $122.5B | 28.0× | 17.5× | 8.0× | 7.9% | 70.2% | 29.2% | 14.4% | 10.1% | 1.7× | 2,005 |
| VXZ | $116.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 |
| BNS | $109.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 488 |
| BX | $101.8B | 35.1× | — | 7.0× | 9.2% | — | 20.9% | 34.8% | 14.2% | — | 2,037 |
| PNC | $101.1B | 15.4× | — | 4.4× | 7.2% | — | 30.3% | 11.5% | 5.9% | — | 1,839 |
| BCLYF | $97.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| CME | $95.2B | 23.7× | — | 14.6× | 6.4% | — | 62.5% | 14.2% | 14.2% | — | 1,699 |
| MRSH | $92.9B | 22.7× | 16.5× | 3.4× | 10.3% | — | 15.4% | 27.2% | 12.4% | 2.8× | 1,471 |
| ICE | $85.0B | 26.0× | 20.2× | 6.7× | 7.5% | — | 26.2% | 11.5% | 6.8% | 3.8× | 1,641 |
| PFSI | $4.0B | 8.2× | — | 196.5× | -25.2% | — | 2492% | 11.6% | 4.8% | — | 228 |
Peers = companies sharing PFSI's sector (Financial Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 10-yr range · 47th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 10-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Tax | 2.4 | 1536.9 | 8812.9 | 4855.9 | 1531.1 | 290.8 | 333.5 | 250.3 |
| Net Income | 8.9 | 4425.3 | 24445.4 | 13651.9 | 3841.2 | 1081.8 | 1157.5 | 2491.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PFSI: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.