Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 214 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 42% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $29M dividends + $0 buybacks = $29M returned on $68M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -25%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $139M covers the $0 due within a year 138673000.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~11.9% on $474M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
No current price collected.
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 3-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 3-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 7.7× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 2.1 | 6.7 | 9.7 | 8.5 | 9.4 | 29.8 | 31.8 | 32.9 |
| Operating Income | 23.2 | 20.2 | 18.4 | 21.3 | -8.5 | -193.2 | -39.2 | -13.4 |
| Net Income | 5.2 | 6.4 | -3.3 | 0.4 | -98.9 | -387.9 | -9.0 | -290.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PKST: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $106.0M 100.0% | $116.4M 100.0% | $143.8M 100.0% | $416.5M 100.0% | $459.9M 100.0% | $397.5M 100.0% | $387.1M 100.0% | $336.4M 100.0% | $346.5M 100.0% | $62.8M 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $34.9M 32.9% | $37.0M 31.8% | $42.8M 29.8% | $39.0M 9.4% | $39.1M 8.5% | $38.6M 9.7% | $26.1M 6.7% | $7.0M 2.1% | $7.3M 2.1% | $2.8M 4.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $120.2M 113.4% | $162.0M 139.2% | $421.7M 293.2% | $451.9M 108.5% | $362.0M 78.7% | — | — | $89.5M 26.6% | $81.3M 23.5% | $58.5M 93.2% |
| Operating Income | -$14.2M -13.4% | -$45.6M -39.2% | -$277.9M -193.2% | -$35.4M -8.5% | $97.8M 21.3% | $73.1M 18.4% | $78.3M 20.2% | $78.0M 23.2% | $82.3M 23.8% | $4.3M 6.8% |
| Interest Expense | $56.6M 53.4% | $56.0M 48.1% | $65.6M 45.6% | $84.8M 20.4% | $85.1M 18.5% | $79.6M 20.0% | $73.6M 19.0% | $55.2M 16.4% | $51.0M 14.7% | $10.4M 16.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $212K 0.1% | $531K 0.2% | $13K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $7.4M 6.9% | $14.5M 12.4% | $13.1M 9.1% | -$943K -0.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | -$307.7M -290.3% | -$10.4M -9.0% | -$557.9M -387.9% | -$411.9M -98.9% | $1.6M 0.4% | -$13.0M -3.3% | $24.8M 6.4% | $17.6M 5.2% | $140.7M 40.6% | -$6.1M -9.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-8.37 | $-0.30 | $-15.50 | $-11.41 | $0.04 | $-0.52 | $0.11 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-8.37 | $-0.30 | $-15.50 | $-11.41 | $0.04 | $-0.52 | $0.11 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 36.8M | 36.4M | 36.0M | 36.1M | 34.4M | 25.6M | 222.5M | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 36.8M | 36.4M | 36.0M | 36.1M | 34.4M | 25.6M | 222.5M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 190 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WELL | $165.2B | 170.7× | — | 15.3× | 35.6% | 40.1% | 8.6% | 2.2% | 1.5% | — | 1,425 |
| EQIX | $103.7B | 76.8× | 26.2× | 11.3× | 5.4% | 51.1% | 14.6% | 9.5% | 9.5% | — | 1,229 |
| AMT | $78.4B | 31.1× | 12.9× | 7.4× | 5.1% | — | 24.7% | 72.0% | 72.0% | — | 1,662 |
| O | $58.6B | 53.6× | — | 10.2× | 9.1% | — | 18.4% | 2.7% | 2.7% | — | 1,389 |
| XHG | $47.8B | — | — | 932.4× | -82.2% | 2.2% | -205% | 11.9% | 12.4% | — | 1 |
| PLDGP | $47.6B | 14.4× | — | 5.4× | 7.2% | — | 37.9% | 6.3% | 3.8% | — | 9 |
| CBRE | $44.7B | 39.3× | — | 1.1× | 13.4% | 18.7% | 2.9% | 13.0% | 7.1% | — | 1,020 |
| VTR | $43.9B | 171.3× | — | 7.5× | 18.5% | — | 4.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | — | 891 |
| IRM | $37.6B | 259.4× | 24.5× | 5.5× | 12.2% | — | 2.2% | -15.5% | 1.0% | 7.4× | 1,043 |
| EXR | $31.7B | 32.7× | 14.8× | 9.4× | 3.7% | 72.8% | 28.8% | 7.3% | 7.3% | — | 722 |
| VICI | $28.2B | 10.1× | — | 7.0× | 4.1% | 99.3% | 69.3% | 10.0% | 6.2% | — | 898 |
| AVB | $26.6B | 25.6× | 12.2× | 8.7× | 4.4% | — | 34.7% | 9.1% | 5.0% | 3.2× | 715 |
| EQR | $25.6B | 23.0× | — | — | — | — | — | 10.1% | 5.8% | — | 681 |
| SBAC | $18.9B | 18.2× | 20.0× | 6.7× | 5.1% | 75.5% | 37.4% | -21.7% | 17.2% | 7.4× | 636 |
| BEKE | $18.7B | 140.8× | 40.7× | 1.4× | -85.5% | 21.4% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 4.4% | 0.4× | 197 |
| INVH | $18.6B | 31.8× | — | 6.8× | 4.2% | — | 21.5% | 6.2% | 3.3% | — | 560 |
| WY | $18.6B | 57.4× | 18.7× | 2.7× | -3.1% | 14.8% | 4.7% | 3.4% | 2.2% | 4.1× | 868 |
| ESS | $18.6B | 27.7× | 12.3× | 9.8× | 6.4% | 69.9% | 37.2% | 12.7% | 12.7% | — | 582 |
| JLL | $17.5B | 22.8× | 13.8× | 0.7× | 11.4% | — | 3.0% | 10.6% | 9.3% | 0.8× | 615 |
| HST | $17.3B | 22.9× | — | 2.8× | 7.6% | — | 12.5% | 11.7% | 9.8% | — | 656 |
| LAMR | $16.1B | 27.4× | — | 7.1× | 2.7% | 67.0% | 25.9% | 57.3% | 14.0% | — | 655 |
| WPC | $15.8B | — | — | 9.2× | 8.4% | — | 27.2% | 5.7% | 2.8% | — | 834 |
| DOC | $15.1B | 217.9× | — | 5.4× | 4.5% | — | 2.5% | 1.0% | 0.4% | — | 724 |
| SUI | $14.9B | 11.2× | — | 6.5× | 2.0% | — | 61.3% | 20.3% | 20.3% | — | 487 |
| OHI | $14.4B | 25.1× | — | 12.1× | 13.2% | — | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 718 |
| PKST | — | — | — | — | -8.9% | — | -290% | -41.3% | -25.2% | 21.4× | 214 |
Peers = companies sharing PKST's sector (Real Estate) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position