Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 2,883 of 5,944 reporting institutions (100th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $158.43 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 45.5%/yr for a decade (off $1.3B normalized FCF).
The market's 45.5% is more conservative than its 4-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 2.39B shares · net debt -$1.4B
mean 96.1% · volatility σ 134% · implied rate exceeded in 3/4 yrs
Central path = implied 45.5%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (134%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.48B 100.0% | $2.87B 100.0% | $2.23B 100.0% | $1.91B 100.0% | $1.54B 100.0% | $1.09B 100.0% | $742.6M 100.0% | $595.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $789.2M 17.6% | $566.0M 19.8% | $431.1M 19.4% | $408.5M 21.4% | $339.4M 22.0% | $352.5M 32.3% | $242.4M 32.6% | $165.4M 27.8% |
| Gross Profit | $3.69B 82.4% | $2.30B 80.2% | $1.79B 80.6% | $1.50B 78.6% | $1.20B 78.0% | $740.1M 67.7% | $500.2M 67.4% | $430.0M 72.2% |
| Research & Development | $557.7M 12.5% | $507.9M 17.7% | $404.6M 18.2% | $359.7M 18.9% | $387.5M 25.1% | $560.7M 51.3% | $305.6M 41.2% | $285.5M 47.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $657.7M 14.7% | $593.5M 20.7% | $524.3M 23.6% | $596.3M 31.3% | $611.5M 39.7% | $669.4M 61.3% | $320.9M 43.2% | $306.2M 51.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $2.27B 50.8% | $1.99B 69.4% | $1.67B 75.2% | $1.66B 87.0% | $1.61B 104.6% | $1.91B 175.1% | $1.08B 145.0% | $1.05B 176.9% |
| Operating Income | $1.41B 31.6% | $310.4M 10.8% | $120.0M 5.4% | -$161.2M -8.5% | -$411.0M -26.7% | -$1.17B -107.4% | -$576.4M -77.6% | -$623.4M -104.7% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | $3.5M 0.2% | $4.1M 0.2% | $3.6M 0.2% | $14.1M 1.3% | $3.1M 0.4% | $3.4M 0.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $229.2M 5.1% | $196.8M 6.9% | $132.6M 6.0% | $20.3M 1.1% | $1.6M 0.1% | $4.7M 0.4% | $15.1M 2.0% | $10.5M 1.8% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $14.2M 0.3% | -$18.0M -0.6% | -$15.4M -0.7% | -$220.1M -11.6% | -$75.4M -4.9% | $4.1M 0.4% | -$2.9M -0.4% | -$2.6M -0.4% |
| Pretax Income | $1.66B 37.0% | $489.2M 17.1% | $237.1M 10.7% | -$361.0M -18.9% | -$488.5M -31.7% | -$1.18B -107.9% | -$567.3M -76.4% | -$570.9M -95.9% |
| Income Tax Expense | $22.7M 0.5% | $21.3M 0.7% | $19.7M 0.9% | $10.1M 0.5% | $31.9M 2.1% | -$12.6M -1.2% | $12.4M 1.7% | $9.1M 1.5% |
| Net Income | $1.63B 36.3% | $462.2M 16.1% | $209.8M 9.4% | -$373.7M -19.6% | -$520.4M -33.7% | -$1.17B -106.7% | -$579.6M -78.1% | -$580.0M -97.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.69 | $0.21 | $0.10 | $-0.18 | $-0.27 | $-1.19 | $-1.02 | $-1.11 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.63 | $0.19 | $0.09 | $-0.18 | $-0.27 | $-1.20 | $-1.02 | $-1.17 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 2.37B | 2.25B | 2.15B | 2.06B | 1.92B | 977.7M | 577.0M | 537.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 2.57B | 2.45B | 2.30B | 2.06B | 1.92B | 979.3M | 577.0M | 544.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $75M buybacks = $75M returned on $2.1B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 22%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $1.4B covers all $200M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2020-12-31 (10-K).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2023 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 58th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 6.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 27.8 | 32.6 | 32.3 | 22.0 | 21.4 | 19.4 | 19.8 | 17.6 |
| Gross Profit | 72.2 | 67.4 | 67.7 | 78.0 | 78.6 | 80.6 | 80.2 | 82.4 |
| R&D | 47.9 | 41.2 | 51.3 | 25.1 | 18.9 | 18.2 | 17.7 | 12.5 |
| SG&A | 51.4 | 43.2 | 61.3 | 39.7 | 31.3 | 23.6 | 20.7 | 14.7 |
| Operating Income | -104.7 | -77.6 | -107.4 | -26.7 | -8.5 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 31.6 |
| Income Tax | 1.5 | 1.7 | -1.2 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | -97.4 | -78.1 | -106.7 | -33.7 | -19.6 | 9.4 | 16.1 | 36.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PLTR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
Peers = companies sharing PLTR's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position