Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 201 of 5,944 reporting institutions (92th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $46.06 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 9.8%/yr for a decade (off $198M normalized FCF).
The market's 9.8% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares · net debt $2.1B
mean 13.9% · volatility σ 205% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 9.8%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (205%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $160M buybacks = $160M returned on $163M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 13-yr range · 35th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 13-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG&A | 16.7 | 18.7 | 22.0 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 12.8 | 12.6 | 13.7 |
| Operating Income | 11.1 | 15.2 | -56.0 | 28.7 | 29.3 | 26.6 | 26.9 | 22.0 |
| Income Tax | 1.3 | 2.8 | -7.1 | -0.0 | 5.7 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| Net Income | 3.3 | 6.4 | -72.3 | 17.1 | 16.8 | 13.6 | 13.2 | 10.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PRKS: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.66B 100.0% | $1.73B 100.0% | $1.73B 100.0% | $1.73B 100.0% | $1.50B 100.0% | $431.8M 100.0% | $1.40B 100.0% | $1.37B 100.0% | $1.26B 100.0% | $1.34B 100.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $227.7M 13.7% | $216.9M 12.6% | $221.2M 12.8% | $200.1M 11.6% | $184.9M 12.3% | $94.9M 22.0% | $261.7M 18.7% | $229.7M 16.7% | $228.8M 18.1% | $238.6M 17.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.30B 78.0% | $1.26B 73.1% | $1.27B 73.4% | $1.22B 70.7% | $1.07B 71.3% | $673.4M 156.0% | $1.19B 84.8% | $1.22B 88.9% | $1.46B 115.9% | $1.28B 95.6% |
| Operating Income | $365.4M 22.0% | $463.3M 26.9% | $459.8M 26.6% | $507.5M 29.3% | $432.0M 28.7% | -$241.7M -56.0% | $213.2M 15.2% | $151.7M 11.1% | -$201.4M -15.9% | $59.6M 4.4% |
| Interest Expense | $134.1M 8.1% | $167.8M 9.7% | $146.7M 8.5% | $117.5M 6.8% | $116.6M 7.8% | $100.9M 23.4% | $84.2M 6.0% | $80.9M 5.9% | $78.0M 6.2% | $62.7M 4.7% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$4.8M -0.3% | -$64K -0.0% | $18K 0.0% | $43K 0.0% | -$144K -0.0% | -$276K -0.1% | -$18K -0.0% | $100K 0.0% | $115K 0.0% | -$125K -0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $226.5M 13.6% | $291.5M 16.9% | $313.1M 18.1% | $390.1M 22.5% | $256.3M 17.0% | -$342.8M -79.4% | $129.0M 9.2% | $62.7M 4.6% | -$287.4M -22.7% | -$3.2M -0.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $58.2M 3.5% | $64.0M 3.7% | $78.9M 4.6% | $98.9M 5.7% | -$164K -0.0% | -$30.5M -7.1% | $39.5M 2.8% | $17.9M 1.3% | -$85.0M -6.7% | $9.3M 0.7% |
| Net Income | $168.4M 10.1% | $227.5M 13.2% | $234.2M 13.6% | $291.2M 16.8% | $256.5M 17.1% | -$312.3M -72.3% | $89.5M 6.4% | $44.8M 3.3% | -$202.4M -16.0% | -$12.5M -0.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.09 | $3.82 | $3.66 | $4.18 | $3.28 | $-3.99 | $1.11 | $0.52 | $-2.36 | $-0.15 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.06 | $3.79 | $3.63 | $4.14 | $3.22 | $-3.99 | $1.10 | $0.52 | $-2.36 | $-0.15 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 54.6M | 59.5M | 64.0M | 69.6M | 78.3M | 78.2M | 80.3M | 86.2M | 85.8M | 84.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 55.0M | 60.0M | 64.5M | 70.3M | 79.6M | 78.2M | 81.0M | 86.9M | 85.8M | 84.9M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $100M covers the $15M due within a year 6.5× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~6.0% on $2.2B of debt.
Cash of $100M fully covers short-term debt of $15M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| PRKS | $2.5B | 15.1× | 8.7× | 1.5× | -3.6% | — | 10.1% | -38.6% | 9.5% | 4.2× | 201 |
Peers = companies sharing PRKS's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.