Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -10.43% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 1111 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | $1.05T | 51.0× | — | 16.1× | 44.7% | 83.0% | 31.7% | 77.8% | 29.9% | — | 4,193 |
| AKTX | $679.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | -61.1% | -61.1% | — | 1 |
| JNJ | $620.1B | 23.4× | — | 6.6× | 6.0% | 67.9% | 28.5% | 32.9% | 20.7% | — | 4,451 |
| ABBV | $435.4B | 104.3× | 31.4× | 7.1× | 8.6% | 70.2% | 6.9% | -129% | 6.6% | 4.2× | 3,895 |
| UNH | $374.0B | 31.2× | 21.4× | 0.8× | 11.8% | 88.7% | 2.7% | 12.0% | 6.8% | 3.9× | 2,891 |
| BDRX | $359.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| MRK | $321.1B | 17.6× | — | 4.9× | 1.3% | 74.8% | 28.1% | 34.7% | 17.9% | — | 3,594 |
| NVSEF | $289.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| AZN | $250.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,248 |
| AMGN | $219.7B | 28.7× | 18.3× | 6.0× | 10.0% | 67.2% | 21.0% | 89.1% | 13.1% | 3.5× | 3,014 |
| TMO | $217.8B | 32.6× | 28.5× | 4.9× | 3.9% | — | 15.1% | 12.6% | 7.0% | 4.9× | 2,481 |
| ABT | $183.9B | 28.4× | 19.5× | 4.2× | 5.7% | 56.4% | 14.7% | 12.5% | 10.5% | 1.0× | 2,964 |
| GILD | $163.5B | 19.4× | 18.1× | 5.5× | 2.4% | 78.8% | 28.9% | 37.5% | 17.9% | 2.4× | 2,218 |
| PFE | $146.7B | 19.0× | — | 2.3× | -1.6% | 74.3% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 5.1% | — | 2,838 |
| DHR | $141.1B | 39.5× | 29.3× | 5.7× | 2.9% | 59.1% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 5.1% | 3.4× | 2,083 |
| ISRG | $133.2B | 47.7× | 36.6× | 13.2× | 20.5% | 66.0% | 28.4% | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | 2,190 |
| SYK | $128.8B | 40.1× | 21.8× | 5.1× | 11.2% | 64.0% | 12.9% | 14.5% | 8.5% | 2.5× | 2,196 |
| CVS | $126.0B | 71.3× | 12.7× | 0.3× | 7.8% | 45.0% | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 0.0× | 1,795 |
| VRTX | $123.1B | 31.6× | 26.9× | 10.3× | 8.9% | 86.2% | 32.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | — | 1,609 |
| MDT | $110.1B | 23.1× | 11.7× | 3.0× | 8.4% | 65.0% | 13.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 0.2× | 2,114 |
| GLAXF | $106.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| MCK | $102.7B | 22.9× | 16.2× | 0.3× | 12.4% | 3.6% | 1.2% | -219% | 109% | 1.0× | 1,946 |
| SNYNF | $101.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| HCA | $92.0B | 14.5× | — | 1.2× | 7.1% | — | 9.0% | -113% | 16.8% | — | 1,346 |
| ELV | $86.4B | 15.5× | 14.8× | 0.4× | 12.5% | 89.4% | 2.8% | 12.9% | 7.6% | 4.2× | 1,397 |
| PSNL | $1.4B | — | — | 19.9× | -17.7% | 22.7% | -117% | -31.1% | -31.1% | — | 138 |
Peers = companies sharing PSNL's sector (Healthcare) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on -$79M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 9 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -31%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 9 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $124M covers all $20M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2019-06-30 (10-Q).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $69.6M 100.0% | $84.6M 100.0% | $73.5M 100.0% | $65.0M 100.0% | $85.5M 100.0% | $78.6M 100.0% | $65.2M 100.0% | $37.8M 100.0% | $9.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $53.9M 77.3% | $57.8M 68.3% | $55.3M 75.2% | $51.7M 79.5% | $53.8M 63.0% | $58.5M 74.4% | $43.1M 66.1% | $26.0M 68.7% | $11.7M 124.9% |
| Research & Development | $50.3M 72.2% | $48.9M 57.8% | $64.8M 88.2% | $64.9M 99.8% | $49.3M 57.7% | $28.6M 36.3% | $22.4M 34.4% | $14.3M 37.9% | $9.9M 105.6% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $53.6M 76.9% | $46.2M 54.6% | $49.7M 67.7% | $64.0M 98.3% | $47.7M 55.8% | $33.7M 42.8% | $22.1M 33.9% | $11.3M 29.8% | $9.9M 105.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $157.7M 226.4% | $152.9M 180.7% | $183.4M 249.6% | $180.6M 277.6% | $150.8M 176.4% | $120.8M 153.6% | $87.6M 134.4% | $51.5M 136.5% | $31.6M 336.0% |
| Operating Income | -$88.1M -126.4% | -$68.3M -80.7% | -$109.9M -149.6% | -$115.5M -177.6% | -$65.4M -76.4% | -$42.1M -53.6% | -$22.4M -34.4% | -$13.8M -36.5% | -$22.2M -236.0% |
| Interest Expense | $205K 0.3% | $24K 0.0% | $110K 0.1% | $201K 0.3% | $184K 0.2% | $2K 0.0% | $1.1M 1.7% | $1.9M 5.0% | $1.3M 13.9% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $7.2M 10.3% | $5.5M 6.5% | $5.9M 8.0% | $2.4M 3.7% | $367K 0.4% | $949K 1.2% | $1.6M 2.5% | $293K 0.8% | $100K 1.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$142K -0.2% | -$18.5M -21.8% | -$4.1M -5.5% | $61K 0.1% | -$42K -0.0% | -$24K -0.0% | -$1.4M -2.2% | $150K 0.4% | -$227K -2.4% |
| Pretax Income | -$81.2M -116.7% | -$81.3M -96.0% | -$108.2M -147.3% | -$113.3M -174.1% | -$65.2M -76.3% | -$41.2M -52.4% | -$25.1M -38.5% | -$19.9M -52.6% | -$23.6M -251.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $21K 0.0% | $18K 0.0% | $83K 0.1% | $40K 0.1% | $14K 0.0% | $57K 0.1% | $9K 0.0% | $7K 0.0% | $5K 0.1% |
| Net Income | -$81.3M -116.7% | -$81.3M -96.1% | -$108.3M -147.4% | -$113.3M -174.2% | -$65.2M -76.3% | -$41.3M -52.5% | -$25.1M -38.5% | -$19.9M -52.6% | -$23.6M -251.2% |
| Per Share | |||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.91 | $-1.37 | $-2.25 | $-2.48 | $-1.49 | $-1.20 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.91 | $-1.37 | $-2.25 | $-2.48 | $-1.49 | $-1.20 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 89.2M | 59.3M | 48.2M | 45.7M | 43.9M | 34.4M | 18.0M | 3.1M | 3.0M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 89.2M | 59.3M | 48.2M | 45.7M | 43.9M | 34.4M | — | — | — |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range · 93th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 68.7 | 66.1 | 74.4 | 63.0 | 79.5 | 75.2 | 68.3 | 77.3 |
| R&D | 37.9 | 34.4 | 36.3 | 57.7 | 99.8 | 88.2 | 57.8 | 72.2 |
| SG&A | 29.8 | 33.9 | 42.8 | 55.8 | 98.3 | 67.7 | 54.6 | 76.9 |
| Operating Income | -36.5 | -34.4 | -53.6 | -76.4 | -177.6 | -149.6 | -80.7 | -126.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -52.6 | -38.5 | -52.5 | -76.3 | -174.2 | -147.4 | -96.1 | -116.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on PSNL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.