Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.17% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| RBBN | $378M | 9.8× | 45.2× | 0.5× | 1.3% | 49.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 24.2× | 141 |
Peers = companies sharing RBBN's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 0%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $96M covers the $7M due within a year 13.8× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $96M fully covers short-term debt of $9M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $844.6M 100.0% | $833.9M 100.0% | $826.3M 100.0% | $819.8M 100.0% | $845.0M 100.0% | $843.8M 100.0% | $563.1M 100.0% | $577.9M 100.0% | $329.9M 100.0% | $252.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $423.9M 50.2% | $394.4M 47.3% | $418.3M 50.6% | $418.8M 51.1% | $400.3M 47.4% | $393.0M 46.6% | $246.0M 43.7% | $230.6M 39.9% | $128.4M 38.9% | $85.0M 33.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $70.3M 21.3% | $47.4M 18.8% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $58.2M 17.6% | $37.6M 14.9% |
| Gross Profit | $420.7M 49.8% | $439.5M 52.7% | $408.1M 49.4% | $400.9M 48.9% | $444.7M 52.6% | $450.8M 53.4% | $317.1M 56.3% | $347.3M 60.1% | $201.5M 61.1% | $167.6M 66.4% |
| Research & Development | $178.9M 21.2% | $179.9M 21.6% | $190.7M 23.1% | $203.7M 24.8% | $194.9M 23.1% | $194.5M 23.1% | $141.1M 25.1% | $145.5M 25.2% | $101.5M 30.8% | $72.8M 28.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $64.2M 7.6% | $68.7M 8.2% | $55.0M 6.7% | $51.1M 6.2% | $53.7M 6.4% | $63.3M 7.5% | $53.9M 9.6% | $66.0M 11.4% | $47.6M 14.4% | $35.9M 14.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $424.0M 50.2% | $422.6M 50.7% | $432.4M 52.3% | $449.3M 54.8% | $562.5M 66.6% | $449.1M 53.2% | $506.5M 90.0% | $412.7M 71.4% | $256.7M 77.8% | $181.2M 71.7% |
| Operating Income | -$3.3M -0.4% | $16.9M 2.0% | -$24.3M -2.9% | -$48.3M -5.9% | -$117.8M -13.9% | $1.7M 0.2% | -$189.5M -33.6% | -$65.4M -11.3% | -$55.2M -16.7% | -$13.6M -5.4% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.2M 0.3% | -$29.1M -3.5% | -$3.8M -0.5% | -$44.5M -5.4% | -$74.5M -8.8% | $112.7M 13.4% | $70.4M 12.5% | -$3.8M -0.7% | $1.3M 0.4% | $1.4M 0.6% |
| Pretax Income | -$45.1M -5.3% | -$46.1M -5.5% | -$55.4M -6.7% | -$112.6M -13.7% | -$208.1M -24.6% | $93.3M 11.1% | -$122.9M -21.8% | -$73.4M -12.7% | -$53.7M -16.3% | -$11.4M -4.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$84.7M -10.0% | $8.2M 1.0% | $10.8M 1.3% | -$14.5M -1.8% | -$31.0M -3.7% | $4.7M 0.6% | $7.2M 1.3% | $3.4M 0.6% | -$18.4M -5.6% | $2.5M 1.0% |
| Net Income | $40K 0.0% | -$54K -0.0% | -$66K -0.0% | -$98K -0.0% | -$177K -0.0% | $88.6M 10.5% | -$130.1M -23.1% | -$76.8M -13.3% | — | — |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $0.22 | $-0.31 | $-0.39 | $-0.63 | $-1.20 | $0.64 | $-1.19 | $-0.74 | $-0.60 | $-0.28 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.22 | $-0.31 | $-0.39 | $-0.63 | $-1.20 | $0.61 | $-1.19 | $-0.74 | $-0.60 | $-0.28 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 176.2M | 174.0M | 170.4M | 156.7M | 147.6M | 139.0M | 109.7M | 103.9M | 58.8M | 49.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 179.8M | 174.0M | 170.4M | 156.7M | 147.6M | 144.7M | 109.7M | 103.9M | 58.8M | 49.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $2.15 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 13.0%/yr for a decade (off $21M normalized FCF).
The market's 13.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.18B shares · net debt $228M
mean -323.2% · volatility σ 730% · implied rate exceeded in 2/7 yrs
Central path = implied 13.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (730%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $9M buybacks = $9M returned on $26M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 11-yr range · 14th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 11-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 39.9 | 43.7 | 46.6 | 47.4 | 51.1 | 50.6 | 47.3 | 50.2 |
| Gross Profit | 60.1 | 56.3 | 53.4 | 52.6 | 48.9 | 49.4 | 52.7 | 49.8 |
| R&D | 25.2 | 25.1 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 24.8 | 23.1 | 21.6 | 21.2 |
| SG&A | 11.4 | 9.6 | 7.5 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.7 | 8.2 | 7.6 |
| Operating Income | -11.3 | -33.6 | 0.2 | -13.9 | -5.9 | -2.9 | 2.0 | -0.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | -3.7 | -1.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | -10.0 |
| Net Income | -13.3 | -23.1 | 10.5 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RBBN: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.