Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +2.70% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $482.0M 100.0% | $453.8M 100.0% | $461.8M 100.0% | $615.5M 100.0% | $514.2M 100.0% | $277.3M 100.0% | $270.4M 100.0% | $252.7M 100.0% | $253.2M 100.0% | $260.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $284.7M 59.1% | $274.8M 60.6% | $283.2M 61.3% | $390.3M 63.4% | $319.7M 62.2% | $172.6M 62.2% | $172.7M 63.9% | $165.7M 65.6% | $172.4M 68.1% | $183.5M 70.5% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $172.4M 68.1% | $183.5M 70.5% |
| Gross Profit | $197.3M 40.9% | $179.0M 39.4% | $178.6M 38.7% | $225.2M 36.6% | $194.5M 37.8% | $104.7M 37.8% | $97.7M 36.1% | $87.0M 34.4% | $80.8M 31.9% | $76.7M 29.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $68.9M 27.2% | $75.6M 29.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $160.1M 33.2% | $147.9M 32.6% | $143.2M 31.0% | $181.2M 29.4% | $158.6M 30.8% | $77.6M 28.0% | $75.6M 28.0% | $69.0M 27.3% | $68.9M 27.2% | $79.8M 30.7% |
| Operating Income | $37.2M 7.7% | $31.1M 6.8% | $35.4M 7.7% | $44.0M 7.2% | $36.0M 7.0% | $27.2M 9.8% | $22.1M 8.2% | $18.1M 7.1% | $11.8M 4.7% | -$3.1M -1.2% |
| Interest Expense | $10.0M 2.1% | $17.0M 3.7% | $22.7M 4.9% | $18.3M 3.0% | $10.6M 2.1% | $200K 0.1% | — | — | $390K 0.2% | $617K 0.2% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$10.0M -2.1% | -$17.0M -3.7% | -$21.2M -4.6% | -$18.3M -3.0% | -$10.6M -2.1% | -$205K -0.1% | $146K 0.1% | -$162K -0.1% | -$2.5M -1.0% | -$558K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $27.2M 5.6% | $14.1M 3.1% | $14.2M 3.1% | $25.8M 4.2% | $25.4M 4.9% | $27.0M 9.7% | $22.2M 8.2% | $17.9M 7.1% | $9.4M 3.7% | -$3.6M -1.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $4.9M 1.0% | $2.7M 0.6% | $3.7M 0.8% | $5.3M 0.9% | $4.8M 0.9% | $6.0M 2.2% | $4.8M 1.8% | $3.3M 1.3% | -$225K -0.1% | -$1.5M -0.6% |
| Net Income | $22.3M 4.6% | $11.4M 2.5% | $10.4M 2.3% | $20.5M 3.3% | $20.6M 4.0% | $21.0M 7.6% | $17.5M 6.5% | $14.6M 5.8% | $9.6M 3.8% | -$2.1M -0.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $2.98 | $1.53 | $1.42 | $2.80 | $2.82 | $2.87 | $2.36 | $1.96 | $1.29 | $-0.29 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.96 | $1.52 | $1.41 | $2.78 | $2.77 | $2.86 | $2.35 | $1.95 | $1.29 | $-0.29 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 7.5M | 7.4M | 7.4M | 7.3M | 7.3M | 7.3M | 7.4M | 7.4M | 7.4M | 7.5M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 7.5M | 7.5M | 7.4M | 7.4M | 7.4M | 7.3M | 7.4M | 7.5M | 7.5M | 7.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $49.95 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 0.0%/yr for a decade (off $42M normalized FCF).
The market's 0.0% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt $111M
mean -9.9% · volatility σ 257% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 0.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (257%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 48% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $5M dividends + $201000 buybacks = $5M returned on $10M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 6%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $3M is below the $10M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2024-09-30 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Coverage is adequate but not comfortable. Effective rate ~8.8% on $114M of debt.
Cash of $3M is below short-term debt of $8M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| RCKY | $375M | 16.9× | 11.0× | 0.8× | 6.2% | 40.9% | 4.6% | 8.8% | 6.1% | 2.6× | 115 |
Peers = companies sharing RCKY's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 94th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.2× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 65.6 | 63.9 | 62.2 | 62.2 | 63.4 | 61.3 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Gross Profit | 34.4 | 36.1 | 37.8 | 37.8 | 36.6 | 38.7 | 39.4 | 40.9 |
| Operating Income | 7.1 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 7.0 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 6.8 | 7.7 |
| Income Tax | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Net Income | 5.8 | 6.5 | 7.6 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 4.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RCKY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.