Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional accumulation: ownership increased +5.24% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| RGP | $153M | — | — | 0.3× | -18.0% | 37.5% | -9.0% | -23.9% | -23.9% | — | 134 |
Peers = companies sharing RGP's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -24%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Interest last disclosed in FY2024 (no longer broken out).
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $4.45 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -10.2%/yr for a decade (off $13M normalized FCF).
The market's -10.2% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.03B shares · net debt -$82M
mean 5.3% · volatility σ 84% · implied rate exceeded in 4/9 yrs
Central path = implied -10.2%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (84%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
3/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend exceeds free cash flow (1518%) — funded from the balance sheet or debt, a red flag if it persists. Last year: $9M dividends + $0 buybacks = $9M returned on $619000 FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $452.0M 100.0% | $551.3M 100.0% | $632.8M 100.0% | $775.6M 100.0% | $805.0M 100.0% | $629.5M 100.0% | $703.4M 100.0% | $729.0M 100.0% | $654.1M 100.0% | $583.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $282.3M 62.5% | $343.9M 62.4% | $386.7M 61.1% | $462.5M 59.6% | $488.4M 60.7% | $388.1M 61.7% | $427.9M 60.8% | $446.6M 61.3% | $408.1M 62.4% | $362.1M 62.1% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $408.1M 62.4% | $362.1M 62.1% |
| Gross Profit | $169.7M 37.5% | $207.4M 37.6% | $246.1M 38.9% | $313.1M 40.4% | $316.6M 39.3% | $241.4M 38.3% | $275.5M 39.2% | $282.4M 38.7% | $246.1M 37.6% | $221.3M 37.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $202.8M 44.9% | $202.0M 36.6% | $208.9M 33.0% | $228.8M 29.5% | $224.7M 27.9% | $209.3M 33.3% | $228.1M 32.4% | $223.8M 30.7% | $209.0M 32.0% | $183.5M 31.4% |
| Operating Income | -$38.3M -8.5% | -$196.8M -35.7% | $28.8M 4.5% | $72.8M 9.4% | $83.4M 10.4% | $23.0M 3.6% | $36.7M 5.2% | $50.2M 6.9% | $30.6M 4.7% | $34.4M 5.9% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | -$1.1M -0.2% | $552K 0.1% | $1.1M 0.1% | $1.6M 0.3% | $2.1M 0.3% | $2.2M 0.3% | $1.7M 0.3% | $629K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $132K 0.0% | $144K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$493K -0.1% | $138K 0.0% | -$11K -0.0% | $382K 0.0% | $594K 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$38.1M -8.4% | -$196.1M -35.6% | $29.8M 4.7% | $72.6M 9.4% | $83.0M 10.3% | $22.7M 3.6% | $35.2M 5.0% | $48.0M 6.6% | $28.9M 4.4% | $33.8M 5.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.5M 0.5% | -$4.3M -0.8% | $8.8M 1.4% | $18.3M 2.4% | $15.8M 2.0% | -$2.5M -0.4% | $6.9M 1.0% | $16.5M 2.3% | $10.1M 1.5% | $15.1M 2.6% |
| Net Income | -$40.6M -9.0% | -$191.8M -34.8% | $21.0M 3.3% | $54.4M 7.0% | $67.2M 8.3% | $25.2M 4.0% | $28.3M 4.0% | $31.5M 4.3% | $18.8M 2.9% | $18.7M 3.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.21 | $-5.80 | $0.63 | $1.63 | $2.04 | $0.78 | $0.88 | $1.00 | $0.61 | $0.57 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.21 | $-5.80 | $0.62 | $1.59 | $2.00 | $0.78 | $0.88 | $0.98 | $0.60 | $0.56 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 33.6M | 33.1M | 33.4M | 33.4M | 33.0M | 32.4M | 32.0M | 31.6M | 30.7M | 32.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 33.6M | 33.1M | 33.9M | 34.2M | 33.6M | 32.6M | 32.2M | 32.2M | 31.2M | 33.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 4.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 61.3 | 60.8 | 61.7 | 60.7 | 59.6 | 61.1 | 62.4 | 62.5 |
| Gross Profit | 38.7 | 39.2 | 38.3 | 39.3 | 40.4 | 38.9 | 37.6 | 37.5 |
| SG&A | 30.7 | 32.4 | 33.3 | 27.9 | 29.5 | 33.0 | 36.6 | 44.9 |
| Operating Income | 6.9 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 10.4 | 9.4 | 4.5 | -35.7 | -8.5 |
| Income Tax | 2.3 | 1.0 | -0.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.4 | -0.8 | 0.5 |
| Net Income | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 7.0 | 3.3 | -34.8 | -9.0 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RGP: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.