Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 184 of 5,944 reporting institutions (91th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| RGR | $624M | — | 57.3× | 1.1× | 1.9% | 14.9% | -0.8% | -1.5% | -1.5% | — | 184 |
Peers = companies sharing RGR's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $38.42 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.6%/yr for a decade (off $30M normalized FCF).
The market's 7.6% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.02B shares · net debt -$18M
mean 31.9% · volatility σ 118% · implied rate exceeded in 5/9 yrs
Central path = implied 7.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (118%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $546.1M 100.0% | $535.6M 100.0% | $543.8M 100.0% | $595.8M 100.0% | $730.7M 100.0% | $568.9M 100.0% | $410.5M 100.0% | $495.6M 100.0% | $522.3M 100.0% | $664.3M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $464.9M 85.1% | $421.2M 78.6% | $410.1M 75.4% | $415.8M 69.8% | $451.2M 61.7% | $377.4M 66.3% | $311.0M 75.7% | $361.3M 72.9% | $368.2M 70.5% | $444.8M 67.0% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $368.2M 70.5% | $444.8M 67.0% |
| Gross Profit | $81.2M 14.9% | $114.4M 21.4% | $133.6M 24.6% | $180.1M 30.2% | $279.6M 38.3% | $191.4M 33.7% | $99.5M 24.3% | $134.4M 27.1% | $154.0M 29.5% | $219.6M 33.0% |
| Research & Development | $8.4M 1.5% | $8.2M 1.5% | $9.8M 1.8% | $9.6M 1.6% | $11.7M 1.6% | $8.0M 1.4% | $8.2M 2.0% | $8.5M 1.7% | $9.8M 1.9% | $8.7M 1.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $54.2M 9.9% | $44.0M 8.2% | $42.8M 7.9% | $40.6M 6.8% | $43.3M 5.9% | $39.0M 6.9% | $30.3M 7.4% | $32.2M 6.5% | $28.4M 5.4% | $29.0M 4.4% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $93.5M 17.1% | $82.8M 15.5% | $81.5M 15.0% | $76.6M 12.9% | $76.4M 10.5% | $72.3M 12.7% | $60.2M 14.7% | $67.3M 13.6% | $77.7M 14.9% | $85.1M 12.8% |
| Operating Income | -$12.3M -2.3% | $31.7M 5.9% | $52.1M 9.6% | $103.5M 17.4% | $203.1M 27.8% | $119.1M 20.9% | $39.4M 9.6% | $67.0M 13.5% | $76.3M 14.6% | $134.4M 20.2% |
| Interest Expense | $94K 0.0% | $102K 0.0% | $205K 0.0% | $256K 0.0% | $164K 0.0% | $191K 0.0% | $192K 0.0% | $330K 0.1% | $152K 0.0% | $186K 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $3.3M 0.6% | $4.9M 0.9% | $5.5M 1.0% | $2.6M 0.4% | $49K 0.0% | $1.1M 0.2% | $2.6M 0.6% | $211K 0.0% | $27K 0.0% | $14K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $5.1M 0.9% | $6.1M 1.1% | $6.7M 1.2% | $4.8M 0.8% | $3.5M 0.5% | $1.8M 0.3% | $3.7M 0.9% | $1.7M 0.3% | $1.3M 0.2% | $1.5M 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | -$7.2M -1.3% | $37.8M 7.1% | $58.8M 10.8% | $108.3M 18.2% | $206.6M 28.3% | $121.0M 21.3% | $43.0M 10.5% | $68.7M 13.9% | $77.6M 14.9% | $135.9M 20.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$2.8M -0.5% | $7.2M 1.3% | $10.6M 2.0% | $19.9M 3.3% | $50.7M 6.9% | $30.6M 5.4% | $10.7M 2.6% | $17.8M 3.6% | $25.5M 4.9% | $48.4M 7.3% |
| Net Income | -$4.4M -0.8% | $30.6M 5.7% | $48.2M 8.9% | $88.3M 14.8% | $155.9M 21.3% | $90.4M 15.9% | $32.3M 7.9% | $50.9M 10.3% | $52.1M 10.0% | $87.5M 13.2% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-0.27 | $1.79 | $2.73 | $5.00 | $8.87 | $5.17 | $1.85 | $2.92 | $2.94 | $4.62 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.27 | $1.77 | $2.71 | $4.96 | $8.78 | $5.09 | $1.82 | $2.88 | $2.91 | $4.59 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 16.2M | 17.1M | 17.7M | 17.6M | 17.6M | 17.5M | 17.5M | 17.5M | 17.7M | 18.9M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 16.2M | 17.3M | 17.8M | 17.8M | 17.8M | 17.8M | 17.8M | 17.7M | 17.9M | 19.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 26% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $10M dividends + $26M buybacks = $36M returned on $38M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -2%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 52th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 72.9 | 75.7 | 66.3 | 61.7 | 69.8 | 75.4 | 78.6 | 85.1 |
| Gross Profit | 27.1 | 24.3 | 33.7 | 38.3 | 30.2 | 24.6 | 21.4 | 14.9 |
| R&D | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| SG&A | 6.5 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 5.9 | 6.8 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Operating Income | 13.5 | 9.6 | 20.9 | 27.8 | 17.4 | 9.6 | 5.9 | -2.3 |
| Income Tax | 3.6 | 2.6 | 5.4 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.3 | -0.5 |
| Net Income | 10.3 | 7.9 | 15.9 | 21.3 | 14.8 | 8.9 | 5.7 | -0.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RGR: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.