Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Insufficient data to determine institutional momentum.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
No trend data available for this metric.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $967.6M 100.0% | $746.4M 100.0% | $1.47B 100.0% | $939.5M 100.0% | $1.55B 100.0% | $834.2M 100.0% | $652.1M 100.0% | $423.0M 100.0% | $322.2M 100.0% | $190.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $145.4M 15.0% | $167.6M 22.5% | $172.8M 11.8% | $60.8M 6.5% | $27.0M 1.7% | — | $7.6M 1.2% | $800K 0.2% | $398K 0.1% | $14.8M 7.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $599.7M 62.0% | $689.4M 92.4% | $764.9M 52.2% | $654.8M 69.7% | $906.2M 58.3% | $428.5M 51.4% | $385.2M 59.1% | $310.5M 73.4% | $227.9M 70.7% | $82.1M 43.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $892.0M 92.2% | $1.24B 166.7% | $1.37B 93.4% | $909.6M 96.8% | $1.04B 66.9% | $558.0M 66.9% | $485.5M 74.4% | $377.6M 89.3% | $293.3M 91.0% | $141.6M 74.4% |
| Operating Income | $75.6M 7.8% | -$497.5M -66.7% | $96.1M 6.6% | $29.9M 3.2% | $514.5M 33.1% | $276.3M 33.1% | $166.7M 25.6% | $45.4M 10.7% | $28.8M 9.0% | $48.7M 25.6% |
| Interest Expense | $92.7M 9.6% | $133.3M 17.9% | $156.2M 10.7% | $141.0M 15.0% | $92.5M 5.9% | $65.2M 7.8% | $50.2M 7.7% | $33.4M 7.9% | $8.4M 2.6% | $2.0M 1.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $3.7M 0.4% | $3.6M 0.5% | $3.9M 0.3% | $2.7M 0.3% | $229K 0.0% | $564K 0.1% | $1.6M 0.2% | $1.3M 0.3% | $420K 0.1% | $318K 0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $229.6M 23.7% | -$900.4M -120.6% | -$199.3M -13.6% | -$334.3M -35.6% | $614.8M 39.5% | $279.5M 33.5% | $116.6M 17.9% | $21.3M 5.0% | $20.4M 6.3% | $47.0M 24.7% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$9.9M -1.0% | $22.0M 2.9% | -$39.1M -2.7% | -$65.3M -6.9% | $164.0M 10.5% | $75.4M 9.0% | $34.6M 5.3% | $4.9M 1.2% | $8.5M 2.6% | $14.3M 7.5% |
| Net Income | $307.0M 31.7% | -$764.0M -102.4% | -$100.0M -6.8% | -$159.8M -17.0% | $445.1M 28.6% | $205.1M 24.6% | $81.6M 12.5% | $16.3M 3.9% | $11.6M 3.6% | $21.5M 11.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $9.80 | $-25.46 | $-3.69 | $-5.95 | $15.99 | $7.83 | $3.08 | $0.60 | $0.50 | $1.19 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $9.80 | $-25.46 | $-3.69 | $-5.95 | $15.09 | $7.56 | $2.95 | $0.58 | $0.48 | $1.17 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 30.6M | 30.3M | 29.3M | 28.2M | 27.4M | 25.6M | 26.4M | 25.9M | 23.2M | 18.1M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 30.6M | 30.3M | 29.3M | 28.2M | 29.0M | 26.5M | 27.5M | 26.8M | 24.3M | 18.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 24%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $227M is below the $473M due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (10-K/A).
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~6.5% on $1.4B of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
No current price collected.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 0.2 | 1.2 | — | 1.7 | 6.5 | 11.8 | 22.5 | 15.0 |
| SG&A | 73.4 | 59.1 | 51.4 | 58.3 | 69.7 | 52.2 | 92.4 | 62.0 |
| Operating Income | 10.7 | 25.6 | 33.1 | 33.1 | 3.2 | 6.6 | -66.7 | 7.8 |
| Income Tax | 1.2 | 5.3 | 9.0 | 10.5 | -6.9 | -2.7 | 2.9 | -1.0 |
| Net Income | 3.9 | 12.5 | 24.6 | 28.6 | -17.0 | -6.8 | -102.4 | 31.7 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RILY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.