Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 749 of 5,944 reporting institutions (98th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| RL | $22.7B | 25.2× | 15.5× | 2.8× | 14.6% | 69.9% | 11.6% | 33.1% | 23.1% | 0.9× | 749 |
Peers = companies sharing RL's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 23%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~4.4% on $1.2B of debt.
Cash of $2.0B fully covers short-term debt of $0.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $380.78 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 7.4%/yr for a decade (off $1.1B normalized FCF).
The market's 7.4% is more optimistic than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.06B shares (market data) · net debt -$749M
mean 18.2% · volatility σ 73% · implied rate exceeded in 3/9 yrs
Central path = implied 7.4%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (73%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage rising year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 19% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $217M dividends + $624M buybacks = $840M returned on $1.1B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.11B 100.0% | $7.08B 100.0% | $6.63B 100.0% | $6.44B 100.0% | $6.22B 100.0% | $4.40B 100.0% | $6.16B 100.0% | $6.31B 100.0% | $6.18B 100.0% | $6.65B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $2.45B 30.1% | $2.23B 31.4% | $2.20B 33.2% | $2.28B 35.3% | $2.07B 33.3% | $1.54B 35.0% | $2.51B 40.7% | $2.43B 38.4% | $2.43B 39.3% | $3.00B 45.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.43B 39.3% | $3.00B 45.1% |
| Gross Profit | $5.67B 69.9% | $4.85B 68.6% | $4.43B 66.8% | $4.17B 64.7% | $4.15B 66.7% | $2.86B 65.0% | $3.65B 59.3% | $3.89B 61.6% | $3.75B 60.7% | $3.65B 54.9% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $4.37B 53.9% | $3.86B 54.6% | $3.60B 54.3% | $3.41B 52.9% | $3.31B 53.2% | $2.64B 60.0% | $3.24B 52.6% | $3.17B 50.2% | $3.10B 50.1% | $3.17B 47.7% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $4.49B 55.3% | $3.92B 55.4% | $3.68B 55.4% | $3.46B 53.7% | $3.35B 53.9% | $2.90B 66.0% | $3.34B 54.2% | $3.32B 52.7% | $3.25B 52.6% | $3.74B 56.3% |
| Operating Income | $1.18B 14.5% | $932.1M 13.2% | $756.4M 11.4% | $704.2M 10.9% | $798.4M 12.8% | -$43.6M -1.0% | $317.0M 5.1% | $561.8M 8.9% | $498.2M 8.1% | -$92.3M -1.4% |
| Interest Expense | $54.2M 0.7% | $44.1M 0.6% | $42.2M 0.6% | $40.4M 0.6% | $54.0M 0.9% | $48.5M 1.1% | $17.6M 0.3% | $20.7M 0.3% | $18.2M 0.3% | $12.4M 0.2% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $53.7M 0.7% | $74.0M 1.0% | $73.0M 1.1% | $32.2M 0.5% | $5.5M 0.1% | $9.7M 0.2% | $34.4M 0.6% | $40.8M 0.6% | $12.3M 0.2% | $7.3M 0.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$1.5M -0.0% | $18.6M 0.3% | $21.0M 0.3% | -$12.3M -0.2% | $4.7M 0.1% | $7.6M 0.2% | -$7.4M -0.1% | $600K 0.0% | -$3.1M -0.1% | -$7.5M -0.1% |
| Pretax Income | $1.18B 14.5% | $950.7M 13.4% | $777.4M 11.7% | $691.9M 10.7% | $754.6M 12.1% | -$74.8M -1.7% | $326.4M 5.3% | $582.5M 9.2% | $489.2M 7.9% | -$104.9M -1.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | $236.6M 2.9% | $207.8M 2.9% | $131.1M 2.0% | $169.2M 2.6% | $154.5M 2.5% | $46.3M 1.1% | -$57.9M -0.9% | $151.6M 2.4% | $326.4M 5.3% | -$5.6M -0.1% |
| Net Income | $941.1M 11.6% | $742.9M 10.5% | $646.3M 9.7% | $522.7M 8.1% | $600.1M 9.7% | -$121.1M -2.8% | $384.3M 6.2% | $430.9M 6.8% | $162.8M 2.6% | -$99.3M -1.5% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $15.42 | $11.86 | $9.91 | $7.72 | $8.22 | $-1.65 | $5.07 | $5.35 | $1.99 | $-1.20 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $15.11 | $11.61 | $9.71 | $7.58 | $8.07 | $-1.65 | $4.98 | $5.27 | $1.97 | $-1.20 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 61.0M | 62.6M | 65.2M | 67.7M | 73.0M | 73.5M | 75.8M | 80.6M | 81.7M | 82.7M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 62.3M | 64.0M | 66.5M | 69.0M | 74.3M | 73.5M | 77.2M | 81.7M | 82.5M | 82.7M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 1.8× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 38.4 | 40.7 | 35.0 | 33.3 | 35.3 | 33.2 | 31.4 | 30.1 |
| Gross Profit | 61.6 | 59.3 | 65.0 | 66.7 | 64.7 | 66.8 | 68.6 | 69.9 |
| SG&A | 50.2 | 52.6 | 60.0 | 53.2 | 52.9 | 54.3 | 54.6 | 53.9 |
| Operating Income | 8.9 | 5.1 | -1.0 | 12.8 | 10.9 | 11.4 | 13.2 | 14.5 |
| Income Tax | 2.4 | -0.9 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
| Net Income | 6.8 | 6.2 | -2.8 | 9.7 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 10.5 | 11.6 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RL: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.