Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional distribution: ownership decreased -1.44% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -40%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $20M covers the $3M due within a year 8.0× over. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2022-12-25 (10-K).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest. Effective rate ~15.8% on $165M of debt.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 34.3× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 23.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SG&A | 10.9 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 10.6 | 10.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 6.3 |
| Operating Income | -0.8 | -1.0 | -31.7 | -3.2 | -4.5 | 0.3 | -4.3 | 0.2 |
| Income Tax | -1.1 | -1.1 | -0.9 | -0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Income | -0.5 | -0.6 | -31.8 | -4.3 | -6.2 | -1.6 | -6.2 | -1.9 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on RRGB: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.21B 100.0% | $1.25B 100.0% | $1.30B 100.0% | $1.27B 100.0% | $1.16B 100.0% | $868.7M 100.0% | $1.32B 100.0% | $1.34B 100.0% | $1.39B 100.0% | $1.30B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $313.5M 23.4% | $320.4M 23.1% | $298.2M 23.0% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $76.3M 6.3% | $118.4M 9.5% | $124.1M 9.5% | $136.6M 10.8% | $122.7M 10.6% | $106.8M 12.3% | $156.0M 11.9% | $146.5M 10.9% | $156.7M 11.3% | $144.6M 11.2% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $1.21B 99.8% | $1.30B 104.3% | $1.30B 99.7% | $1.32B 104.5% | $1.20B 103.2% | $1.14B 131.7% | $1.33B 101.0% | $1.35B 100.8% | $1.35B 97.2% | $1.29B 99.6% |
| Operating Income | $2.8M 0.2% | -$53.1M -4.3% | $4.5M 0.3% | -$57.5M -4.5% | -$37.1M -3.2% | -$275.1M -31.7% | -$13.1M -1.0% | -$10.5M -0.8% | $39.0M 2.8% | $11.6M 0.9% |
| Interest Expense | $26.0M 2.1% | $25.3M 2.0% | $26.6M 2.0% | $20.6M 1.6% | $14.2M 1.2% | $10.2M 1.2% | $10.2M 0.8% | $10.7M 0.8% | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$10.5M -0.9% | -$33.8M -2.7% | $2.7M 0.2% | -$39.0M -3.1% | -$16.1M -1.4% | -$153.9M -17.7% | -$9.1M -0.7% | -$10.9M -0.8% | -$10.0M -0.7% | -$6.8M -0.5% |
| Pretax Income | -$23.0M -1.9% | -$77.6M -6.2% | -$20.9M -1.6% | -$78.1M -6.2% | -$50.6M -4.4% | -$283.6M -32.6% | -$22.2M -1.7% | -$21.4M -1.6% | $29.0M 2.1% | $4.8M 0.4% |
| Income Tax Expense | $258K 0.0% | -$90K -0.0% | $310K 0.0% | $747K 0.1% | -$152K -0.0% | -$7.5M -0.9% | -$14.3M -1.1% | -$15.0M -1.1% | -$999K -0.1% | -$6.9M -0.5% |
| Net Income | -$23.3M -1.9% | -$77.5M -6.2% | -$21.2M -1.6% | -$78.9M -6.2% | -$50.4M -4.3% | -$276.1M -31.8% | -$7.9M -0.6% | -$6.4M -0.5% | $30.0M 2.2% | $11.7M 0.9% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.31 | $-4.93 | $-1.34 | $-4.98 | $-3.22 | $-19.29 | $-0.61 | $-0.49 | $2.33 | $0.88 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.31 | $-4.93 | $-1.34 | $-4.98 | $-3.22 | $-19.29 | $-0.61 | $-0.49 | $2.31 | $0.87 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 17.8M | 15.7M | 15.8M | 15.8M | 15.7M | 14.3M | 13.0M | 13.0M | 12.9M | 13.3M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 17.8M | 15.7M | 15.8M | 15.8M | 15.7M | 14.3M | 13.0M | 13.0M | 13.0M | 13.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| RRGB | $147M | — | 5.4× | 0.1× | -3.1% | — | -1.9% | 21.9% | -39.9% | 3.1× | 58 |
Peers = companies sharing RRGB's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.