Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: -0.03% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Insufficient data. Current ROIC on all capital: 1088%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.” Effective rate ~8.1% on $14M of debt. Interest last disclosed in FY2022 (no longer broken out).
Cash of $2M fully covers short-term debt of $1M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 13 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 259 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIN | $230.5B | 33.6× | 20.6× | 6.8× | 3.0% | — | 20.3% | 18.0% | 10.9% | 2.1× | 2,148 |
| BHPLF | $220.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| SCCO | $162.8B | 37.6× | 21.0× | 12.1× | 17.4% | 60.1% | 32.3% | 39.3% | 24.4% | 0.9× | 791 |
| TX | $107.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 139 |
| FCX | $99.7B | — | 12.0× | 3.9× | 1.8% | 28.2% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 7.9% | 1.0× | 1,775 |
| SHW | $91.6B | 36.0× | — | 3.9× | 2.1% | 48.8% | 10.9% | 55.9% | 17.0% | — | 1,610 |
| AEM | $82.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,066 |
| ECL | $80.5B | 39.2× | 23.7× | 5.0× | 2.2% | 44.5% | 12.9% | 21.2% | 19.5% | 0.3× | 1,619 |
| B | $68.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 979 |
| CRH | $66.9B | 18.1× | 10.4× | 1.8× | 5.3% | 36.1% | 10.0% | 15.6% | 9.2% | 2.2× | 9 |
| APD | $65.7B | — | 92.9× | 5.5× | -0.5% | 31.4% | -3.3% | -2.6% | -2.6% | 0.1× | 1,702 |
| VALE | $63.6B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| SYAXF | $63.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DD | $61.5B | — | — | 9.0× | 1.9% | 34.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 1,172 |
| WPM | $55.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 809 |
| AU | $44.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 537 |
| FNV | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 614 |
| STLD | $38.5B | 33.3× | 20.7× | 2.1× | 3.6% | 13.2% | 6.5% | 13.2% | 9.0% | 2.1× | 893 |
| VMC | $37.5B | 35.4× | 17.6× | 4.7× | 7.1% | 27.4% | 13.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 1.8× | 981 |
| MLM | $33.4B | 29.5× | 18.6× | 5.4× | 8.6% | 30.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 7.4% | 2.6× | 1,022 |
| TCKRF | $32.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 |
| NTR | $32.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 718 |
| AMRZ | $29.2B | 24.7× | 12.1× | 2.5× | 0.9% | 25.7% | 10.0% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 1.9× | 433 |
| GFIOF | $28.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| PPG | $26.6B | 17.2× | — | 1.7× | 0.2% | 41.3% | 9.9% | 19.8% | 10.8% | — | 1,003 |
| SEED | $13M | — | — | 1.0× | -88.7% | 7.0% | -58.4% | 228% | 1088% | — | 13 |
Peers = companies sharing SEED's sector (Basic Materials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.8M 100.0% | $113.4M 100.0% | $93.3M 100.0% | $52.6M 100.0% | $46.4M 100.0% | $52.5M 100.0% | $92.4M 100.0% | $12.9M 100.0% | $870K 100.0% | $481K 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $11.9M 93.0% | $97.3M 85.8% | $76.1M 81.5% | $36.4M 69.2% | $33.6M 72.4% | $49.0M 93.3% | $105.3M 113.9% | $7.0M 54.5% | $678K 77.9% | $0 0.0% |
| Gross Profit | $900K 7.0% | $16.1M 14.2% | $17.2M 18.5% | $16.2M 30.8% | $12.8M 27.6% | $3.5M 6.7% | -$12.8M -13.9% | $5.9M 45.5% | $192K 22.1% | $481K 100.0% |
| Research & Development | $1.8M 14.3% | $10.1M 8.9% | $7.4M 8.0% | $7.4M 14.1% | $2.0M 4.3% | $4.1M 7.8% | $13.3M 14.4% | $27.1M 209.9% | $38.7M 4446.2% | $41.3M 8580.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $5.7M 44.0% | $36.0M 31.7% | $14.2M 15.2% | $14.3M 27.2% | $73.3M 157.9% | $58.1M 110.6% | $27.2M 29.5% | $32.1M 248.7% | $36.1M 4148.7% | $33.0M 6855.3% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $9.0M 70.3% | $52.7M 46.5% | $32.2M 34.6% | $29.1M 55.3% | $150.7M 324.7% | $95.1M 181.1% | $48.7M 52.6% | $6.0M 46.6% | $69.7M 8017.0% | $66.0M 13717.5% |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -$9.2M -1908.7% |
| Interest Expense | — | — | — | $1.2M 2.2% | $8.6M 18.4% | $5.8M 11.0% | $4.7M 5.1% | $22.8M 176.2% | $9.0M 1035.2% | $7.6M 1581.5% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0 0.0% | $6K 0.0% | $1.4M 164.0% | $69K 14.3% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $320K 2.5% | $57.0M 50.3% | $69.7M 74.7% | $15.7M 29.9% | $14.9M 32.1% | -$6.7M -12.7% | -$3.6M -3.9% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$8.2M -63.8% | $18.7M 16.5% | $62.8M 67.3% | $2.3M 4.4% | -$126.9M -273.4% | -$102.4M -195.0% | -$65.1M -70.5% | -$152.8M -1181.9% | -$121.8M -14004.7% | -$73.0M -15184.6% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$41K -0.3% | $61K 0.1% | $162K 0.2% | -$14K -0.0% | $178K 0.4% | $425K 0.8% | $510K 0.6% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | -$7.5M -58.4% | $20.7M 18.3% | $55.3M 59.3% | -$6.3M -11.9% | -$91.5M -197.2% | -$85.3M -162.4% | -$62.1M -67.2% | -$153.7M -1188.7% | -$75.7M -8698.2% | -$65.6M -13633.7% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-1.00 | $3.21 | $8.45 | $-1.09 | $-16.29 | $-16.95 | $-14.85 | $-50.18 | $-26.95 | $-23.76 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.00 | $3.20 | $8.43 | $-1.09 | $-16.29 | $-16.95 | $-14.85 | — | $-0.49 | $-2.87 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 7.5M | 6.5M | 6.5M | 5.8M | 5.6M | 5.0M | 4.2M | 3.1M | 2.8M | 2.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 7.5M | 6.5M | 6.6M | 5.8M | 5.6M | 5.0M | 4.2M | 3.1M | 2.8M | 2.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
Free-cash-flow coverage unavailable. Last year: $153000 dividends + $0 buybacks = $153000 returned on -$5M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 43th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Operating leverage needs meaningful revenue change.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 54.5 | 113.9 | 93.3 | 72.4 | 69.2 | 81.5 | 85.8 | 93.0 |
| Gross Profit | 45.5 | -13.9 | 6.7 | 27.6 | 30.8 | 18.5 | 14.2 | 7.0 |
| R&D | 209.9 | 14.4 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 14.1 | 8.0 | 8.9 | 14.3 |
| SG&A | 248.7 | 29.5 | 110.6 | 157.9 | 27.2 | 15.2 | 31.7 | 44.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | -0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -0.3 |
| Net Income | -1188.7 | -67.2 | -162.4 | -197.2 | -11.9 | 59.3 | 18.3 | -58.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SEED: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.