Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.34% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
How management deployed cash over 8 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A cash-return story — far more went to shareholders than back into the business (mature, low-reinvestment).
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -95%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 8 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Loading top holders...
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| SJ | $42M | — | — | 0.2× | -87.0% | 18.3% | -47.3% | -95.4% | -95.4% | — | 8 |
Peers = companies sharing SJ's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $177.5M 100.0% | $1.36B 100.0% | $206.3M 100.0% | $1.95B 100.0% | $1.67B 100.0% | $1.22B 100.0% | $914.6M 100.0% | $743.0M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $145.1M 81.7% | $1.12B 82.0% | $1.27B 616.6% | $1.67B 85.5% | $1.36B 81.8% | $959.9M 78.5% | $720.6M 78.8% | $594.1M 80.0% |
| Gross Profit | $32.5M 18.3% | $245.4M 18.0% | $192.7M 93.4% | $283.2M 14.5% | $304.5M 18.2% | $262.2M 21.5% | $194.0M 21.2% | $148.9M 20.0% |
| Research & Development | $11.9M 6.7% | $90.5M 6.6% | $75.1M 36.4% | $67.5M 3.5% | $70.0M 4.2% | $31.8M 2.6% | $21.5M 2.4% | $11.0M 1.5% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $12.7M 7.2% | $76.6M 5.6% | $75.6M 36.6% | $61.0M 3.1% | $65.2M 3.9% | $33.9M 2.8% | $12.0M 1.3% | $16.3M 2.2% |
| Operating Income | -$78.9M -44.4% | $40.7M 3.0% | $22.8M 11.1% | $149.8M 7.7% | $166.0M 9.9% | — | -$937K -0.1% | — |
| Interest & Investment Income | $245K 0.1% | $3.2M 0.2% | $2.7M 1.3% | $2.5M 0.1% | $4.0M 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $1.2M 0.7% | $1.6M 0.1% | $7.4M 3.6% | $11.4M 0.6% | -$90K -0.0% | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | -$96.6M -54.4% | $39.3M 2.9% | -$26.5M -12.8% | $213.3M 10.9% | $175.6M 10.5% | $183.5M 15.0% | $156.5M 17.1% | $111.4M 15.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | -$11.5M -6.5% | $12.6M 0.9% | $8.5M 4.1% | $18.1M 0.9% | $5.6M 0.3% | $7.4M 0.6% | $6.6M 0.7% | $4.6M 0.6% |
| Net Income | -$84.0M -47.3% | $39.7M 2.9% | -$30.8M -14.9% | $193.3M 9.9% | $170.0M 10.2% | $176.1M 14.4% | $149.9M 16.4% | $106.7M 14.4% |
| Per Share | ||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $-2.01 | $0.96 | $-0.76 | $4.92 | $5.51 | $7.56 | $7.73 | $5.50 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.01 | $0.95 | $-0.76 | $4.92 | $5.51 | $6.56 | $7.50 | $5.34 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 41.8M | 41.4M | 40.6M | 39.3M | 30.8M | 23.3M | 19.4M | 19.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 41.8M | 41.6M | 40.6M | 39.3M | 30.8M | 26.8M | 20.0M | 20.0M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $0.99 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -60.0%/yr for a decade (off $60M normalized FCF).
The market's -60.0% is more conservative than its 7-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.04B shares (market data) · net debt -$44M
mean -4.3% · volatility σ 74% · implied rate exceeded in 6/7 yrs
Central path = implied -60.0%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (74%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/7 of the 9 checks — 2 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 7 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $10M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 8 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No standout strengths flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 7-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 7-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.4× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 80.0 | 78.8 | 78.5 | 81.8 | 85.5 | 616.6 | 82.0 | 81.7 |
| Gross Profit | 20.0 | 21.2 | 21.5 | 18.2 | 14.5 | 93.4 | 18.0 | 18.3 |
| R&D | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 36.4 | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| SG&A | 2.2 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 36.6 | 5.6 | 7.2 |
| Operating Income | — | -0.1 | — | 9.9 | 7.7 | 11.1 | 3.0 | -44.4 |
| Income Tax | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 4.1 | 0.9 | -6.5 |
| Net Income | 14.4 | 16.4 | 14.4 | 10.2 | 9.9 | -14.9 | 2.9 | -47.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SJ: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.