Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 324 of 5,944 reporting institutions (95th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| SKY | $5.0B | 24.9× | 14.6× | 1.9× | 7.3% | 26.4% | 7.8% | 13.2% | 13.0% | 0.0× | 324 |
Peers = companies sharing SKY's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 13%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~52.3% on $14M of debt.
Cash of $638M fully covers short-term debt of $9M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $91.16 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 8.3%/yr for a decade (off $210M normalized FCF).
The market's 8.3% is more conservative than its 9-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.05B shares (market data) · net debt -$624M
mean 197.8% · volatility σ 442% · implied rate exceeded in 8/9 yrs
Central path = implied 8.3%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (442%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
7/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Insufficient balance-sheet detail (needs retained earnings, working capital, equity).
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $200M buybacks = $200M returned on $270M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.66B 100.0% | $2.48B 100.0% | $2.02B 100.0% | $2.61B 100.0% | $2.21B 100.0% | $1.42B 100.0% | $1.37B 100.0% | $1.36B 100.0% | $1.06B 100.0% | $236.5M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.96B 73.6% | $1.82B 73.3% | $1.54B 76.0% | $1.79B 68.6% | $1.62B 73.3% | $1.13B 79.8% | $1.09B 79.6% | $1.11B 82.0% | $887.6M 83.4% | $214.5M 90.7% |
| Gross Profit | $704.3M 26.4% | $664.0M 26.7% | $485.8M 24.0% | $818.7M 31.4% | $589.1M 26.7% | $287.7M 20.2% | $279.0M 20.4% | $245.4M 18.0% | $177.1M 16.6% | $22.0M 9.3% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $452.6M 17.0% | $427.0M 17.2% | $310.6M 15.3% | $300.4M 11.5% | $256.2M 11.6% | $178.9M 12.6% | $192.5M 14.1% | $275.1M 20.2% | $122.6M 11.5% | $22.9M 9.7% |
| Operating Income | $251.8M 9.5% | $237.0M 9.5% | $175.2M 8.7% | $518.3M 19.9% | $332.9M 15.1% | $108.8M 7.7% | $86.5M 6.3% | -$29.7M -2.2% | $54.6M 5.1% | $349K 0.1% |
| Interest Expense | $7.5M 0.3% | $8.5M 0.3% | $4.6M 0.2% | $3.3M 0.1% | $3.2M 0.1% | $3.8M 0.3% | $4.6M 0.3% | $5.3M 0.4% | $5.1M 0.5% | $344K 0.1% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $24.0M 0.9% | $25.4M 1.0% | $32.9M 1.6% | $18.3M 0.7% | $733K 0.0% | $565K 0.0% | $3.2M 0.2% | $2.0M 0.2% | $948K 0.1% | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $2.4M 0.1% | $3.4M 0.1% | -$2.6M -0.1% | $634K 0.0% | $36K 0.0% | $5.9M 0.4% | $0 0.0% | -$8.3M -0.6% | -$7.3M -0.7% | — |
| Pretax Income | $270.6M 10.2% | $257.4M 10.4% | $200.9M 9.9% | $533.9M 20.5% | $330.4M 15.0% | $111.4M 7.8% | $85.1M 6.2% | -$41.3M -3.0% | $43.1M 4.0% | $5K 0.0% |
| Income Tax Expense | $56.8M 2.1% | $53.7M 2.2% | $47.1M 2.3% | $132.1M 5.1% | $82.4M 3.7% | $26.5M 1.9% | $26.9M 2.0% | $16.9M 1.2% | $27.3M 2.6% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | $206.9M 7.8% | $198.4M 8.0% | $146.7M 7.2% | $401.8M 15.4% | $248.0M 11.2% | $84.9M 6.0% | $58.2M 4.2% | -$58.2M -4.3% | $15.8M 1.5% | $5K 0.0% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $3.68 | $3.45 | $2.55 | $7.05 | $4.37 | $1.50 | $1.03 | $-1.09 | $0.33 | $0.00 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $3.66 | $3.42 | $2.53 | $7.00 | $4.33 | $1.49 | $1.02 | $-1.09 | $0.33 | $0.00 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 56.1M | 57.6M | 57.5M | 57.0M | 56.8M | 56.6M | 56.5M | 53.5M | 44.5M | 8.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 56.5M | 58.1M | 58.0M | 57.4M | 57.3M | 57.0M | 56.8M | 53.5M | 44.5M | 8.5M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 82.0 | 79.6 | 79.8 | 73.3 | 68.6 | 76.0 | 73.3 | 73.6 |
| Gross Profit | 18.0 | 20.4 | 20.2 | 26.7 | 31.4 | 24.0 | 26.7 | 26.4 |
| SG&A | 20.2 | 14.1 | 12.6 | 11.6 | 11.5 | 15.3 | 17.2 | 17.0 |
| Operating Income | -2.2 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 15.1 | 19.9 | 8.7 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Income Tax | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Net Income | -4.3 | 4.2 | 6.0 | 11.2 | 15.4 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 7.8 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on SKY: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.