Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -6.72% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $156.3M 100.0% | $144.6M 100.0% | $461.5M 100.0% | $363.0M 100.0% | $127.4M 100.0% | $36.3M 100.0% | $17.6M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $96.3M 61.6% | $155.6M 107.6% | $457.9M 99.2% | $329.9M 90.9% | $126.1M 99.0% | $40.2M 110.8% | $20.8M 118.6% |
| Gross Profit | $60.0M 38.4% | -$11.1M -7.6% | $3.7M 0.8% | $33.1M 9.1% | $1.2M 1.0% | -$3.9M -10.8% | -$3.3M -18.6% |
| Research & Development | $35.3M 22.6% | $51.3M 35.5% | $56.5M 12.2% | $38.3M 10.6% | $22.7M 17.8% | $15.9M 43.9% | $14.7M 83.8% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $51.6M 33.0% | $88.1M 60.9% | $74.9M 16.2% | $77.0M 21.2% | $41.6M 32.7% | $14.7M 40.5% | $12.4M 70.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $115.6M 74.0% | $828.4M 573.0% | $183.0M 39.6% | $164.2M 45.2% | $84.3M 66.2% | $45.5M 125.3% | $44.6M 254.0% |
| Operating Income | -$55.7M -35.6% | -$839.5M -580.6% | -$179.3M -38.9% | -$131.1M -36.1% | -$83.1M -65.2% | -$49.4M -136.0% | -$47.9M -272.6% |
| Interest Expense | $23.9M 15.3% | $18.3M 12.7% | $15.0M 3.2% | $10.5M 2.9% | $17.4M 13.7% | $20.8M 57.3% | $12.5M 71.5% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $194.0M 124.1% | -$14.2M -9.8% | $39.3M 8.5% | -$8.1M -2.2% | -$18.1M -14.2% | -$106.7M -294.0% | -$11.6M -65.9% |
| Pretax Income | $138.3M 88.5% | -$853.7M -590.4% | -$140.0M -30.3% | -$139.2M -38.4% | -$101.2M -79.5% | -$156.1M -430.0% | -$59.4M -338.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $536K 0.3% | $332K 0.2% | $433K 0.1% | -$15.2M -4.2% | $0 0.0% | $5K 0.0% | $6K 0.0% |
| Net Income | $137.8M 88.2% | -$854.0M -590.7% | -$140.4M -30.4% | -$124.1M -34.2% | -$101.2M -79.5% | -$156.1M -430.0% | -$59.4M -338.5% |
| Per Share | |||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $16.52 | $-105.80 | $-18.05 | $-0.81 | $-0.96 | $-4.13 | $-1.51 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-9.18 | $-105.80 | $-18.05 | $-0.81 | $-0.96 | $-4.13 | $-1.51 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 8.3M | 8.1M | 7.8M | 153.4M | 105.6M | 40.1M | 42.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 8.5M | 8.1M | 7.8M | 153.4M | 105.6M | 40.1M | 42.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
5/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Interest coverage is thin — monitor.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 7 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Operating income fell despite reinvestment — a warning on capital productivity. Current ROIC on all capital: -55%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 7 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Thin coverage — earnings barely cover interest.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Ranked against 768 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | $5.33T | 44.7× | 40.0× | 24.7× | 65.5% | 71.1% | 55.6% | 76.3% | 72.4% | 0.1× | 5,582 |
| AAPL | $4.59T | 41.7× | 32.0× | 11.0× | 6.4% | 46.9% | 26.9% | 152% | 73.7% | 0.5× | 5,858 |
| MSFT | $3.62T | 27.2× | 19.1× | 10.9× | 17.8% | 67.9% | 40.3% | 30.2% | 28.2% | 0.2× | 5,944 |
| AVGO | $1.98T | 87.7× | 78.0× | 31.0× | 23.9% | 67.8% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 15.8% | 2.5× | 4,442 |
| MU | $1.00T | 117.7× | 55.4× | 26.8× | 48.9% | 39.8% | 22.8% | 15.8% | 12.9% | 0.7× | 2,894 |
| AMD | $785.7B | 181.9× | 185.9× | 22.7× | 34.3% | 49.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.5% | 0.8× | 3,059 |
| ASMLF | $649.1B | 68.2× | 51.8× | 19.9× | 15.6% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 49.0% | 43.1% | 0.2× | 2 |
| INTC | $504.7B | — | 62.9× | 9.6× | -0.5% | 34.8% | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.5× | 2,495 |
| CSCO | $481.1B | 47.6× | 40.2× | 8.5× | 5.3% | 64.9% | 18.0% | 21.7% | 13.6% | 2.3× | 3,560 |
| AMAT | $423.7B | 61.7× | 48.7× | 14.9× | 4.4% | 48.7% | 24.7% | 34.3% | 25.9% | 0.8× | 2,826 |
| LRCX | $390.0B | 74.1× | 62.2× | 21.2× | 23.7% | 48.7% | 29.1% | 54.3% | 39.5% | 0.6× | 2,500 |
| PLTR | $378.8B | 251.5× | 262.1× | 84.7× | 56.2% | 82.4% | 36.3% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 2,883 |
| RPAY | $342.2B | — | — | 1106.6× | -1.2% | 75.0% | -83.0% | -53.0% | -33.6% | -1.1× | 142 |
| DELL | $301.7B | 53.3× | 28.8× | 2.7× | 18.8% | 20.0% | 5.2% | -240% | 20.4% | 2.8× | 1,564 |
| ARM | $292.2B | 323.0× | 251.9× | 59.4× | 22.8% | 97.5% | 18.4% | 10.9% | 10.9% | — | 730 |
| TXN | $252.4B | 51.0× | 33.1× | 14.3× | 13.0% | 57.0% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 16.8% | 1.7× | 2,345 |
| ANET | $247.8B | 71.7× | 62.6× | 27.5× | 28.6% | 64.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 1,930 |
| UMC | $242.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 302 |
| PANW | $242.3B | 226.7× | 151.3× | 26.3× | 14.9% | 73.4% | 12.3% | 14.5% | 14.5% | — | 2,374 |
| SAPGF | $241.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| IBM | $221.0B | 21.1× | — | 3.3× | 7.6% | 58.2% | 15.7% | 32.4% | 11.3% | — | 3,351 |
| APH | $211.2B | 51.5× | 29.5× | 9.1× | 51.7% | 36.9% | 18.5% | 31.8% | 31.8% | — | 2,017 |
| SNDK | $197.2B | — | — | 26.8× | 10.4% | 30.1% | -22.3% | -17.8% | -14.9% | -1.5× | 1,127 |
| SHOP | $187.4B | 153.4× | 124.0× | 16.2× | 30.1% | 48.1% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 9.1% | — | 1,642 |
| ADI | $184.9B | 82.8× | 57.2× | 16.8× | 16.9% | 61.5% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 5.3% | 2.6× | 2,030 |
| STEM | $49M | — | — | 0.3× | 8.1% | 38.4% | 88.2% | -55.2% | -55.2% | — | 77 |
Peers = companies sharing STEM's sector (Technology) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Nothing notable to watch.
Where each multiple sits in its own 6-yr range · 0th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 6-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 118.6 | 110.8 | 99.0 | 90.9 | 99.2 | 107.6 | 61.6 |
| Gross Profit | -18.6 | -10.8 | 1.0 | 9.1 | 0.8 | -7.6 | 38.4 |
| R&D | 83.8 | 43.9 | 17.8 | 10.6 | 12.2 | 35.5 | 22.6 |
| SG&A | 70.8 | 40.5 | 32.7 | 21.2 | 16.2 | 60.9 | 33.0 |
| Operating Income | -272.6 | -136.0 | -65.2 | -36.1 | -38.9 | -580.6 | -35.6 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Net Income | -338.5 | -430.0 | -79.5 | -34.2 | -30.4 | -590.7 | 88.2 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on STEM: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.