Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional accumulation: ownership increased +1.51% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $88.96 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds -4.7%/yr for a decade (off $33M normalized FCF).
The market's -4.7% is more conservative than its 1-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.00B shares · net debt -$85M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Ranked against 496 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | $2.93T | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | 16.2% | — | 5,764 |
| TSLA | $1.21T | 297.7× | 127.6× | 12.7× | -2.9% | 18.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.2% | 0.9× | 4,029 |
| PDD | $517.8B | 38.5× | 37.5× | 8.4× | -84.3% | 56.3% | 22.7% | 23.7% | 23.7% | — | 548 |
| HD | $351.7B | 24.8× | 16.4× | 2.1× | 3.2% | 33.3% | 8.6% | 111% | 22.8% | 2.0× | 3,970 |
| TOYOF | $242.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| TJX | $177.0B | 32.8× | — | 2.9× | 7.1% | 31.0% | 9.1% | 53.9% | 45.6% | — | 2,608 |
| LOW | $123.4B | 18.6× | 13.1× | 1.4× | 3.1% | 33.5% | 7.7% | -67.1% | 22.3% | 3.2× | 2,591 |
| SBUX | $120.5B | 65.0× | 28.7× | 3.2× | 2.8% | — | 5.0% | -22.9% | 28.7% | 3.1× | 2,252 |
| MELI | $97.5B | 48.8× | — | 3.4× | 39.1% | 44.5% | 6.9% | 29.6% | 12.5% | — | 1,380 |
| MAR | $96.1B | 38.0× | 22.3× | 3.7× | 4.3% | — | 9.9% | -69.0% | -69.4% | 0.0× | 1,559 |
| LKNCY | $94.1B | 183.4× | 99.1× | 13.4× | -79.6% | — | 7.3% | 23.0% | 23.0% | 0.0× | 9 |
| ABNB | $93.5B | — | 33.9× | 7.6× | 10.3% | 83.0% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 30.6% | 0.0× | 1,246 |
| RCL | $88.7B | 21.0× | — | 5.0× | 8.8% | 49.4% | 23.8% | 42.5% | 12.3% | — | 1,114 |
| ROST | $81.6B | 38.3× | 24.3× | 3.6× | 7.7% | 27.7% | 9.4% | 34.7% | 29.8% | 0.3× | 1,276 |
| GM | $80.6B | 27.3× | 4.0× | 0.4× | -1.3% | — | 1.5% | 4.5% | 4.5% | — | 1,447 |
| ORLY | $78.7B | 31.5× | 21.3× | 4.4× | 6.4% | 51.6% | 14.3% | -333% | 48.3% | 1.5× | 1,569 |
| HLT | $74.8B | 53.0× | 25.7× | 6.2× | 7.7% | — | 12.1% | -27.0% | -27.0% | — | 1,126 |
| RACE | $71.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 690 |
| SE | $70.4B | 45.6× | 28.1× | 3.1× | 36.4% | 44.7% | 6.9% | 12.6% | 12.6% | — | 718 |
| NKE | $63.0B | 20.2× | — | 1.4× | 0.2% | 42.9% | 6.7% | 20.9% | 14.9% | — | 1,848 |
| AZO | $51.4B | 21.1× | 14.2× | 2.7× | 2.4% | 52.6% | 13.2% | -73.2% | 46.4% | 2.1× | 1,245 |
| EBAY | $49.9B | 25.6× | 18.1× | 4.5× | 7.9% | 71.5% | 18.3% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 0.3× | 1,182 |
| VIK | $48.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 479 |
| CMG | $46.1B | 30.3× | 19.9× | 3.9× | 5.4% | — | 12.9% | 54.3% | 54.3% | 0.0× | 1,203 |
| DHI | $44.6B | 13.1× | — | 1.3× | -6.9% | 23.7% | 10.5% | 14.8% | 14.8% | — | 1,092 |
| STRT | $359M | 19.4× | 7.3× | 0.6× | 5.1% | 15.0% | 3.3% | 8.4% | 8.4% | — | 124 |
Peers = companies sharing STRT's sector (Consumer Cyclical) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $565.1M 100.0% | $537.8M 100.0% | $492.9M 100.0% | $452.3M 100.0% | $485.3M 100.0% | $385.3M 100.0% | $487.0M 100.0% | $439.2M 100.0% | $417.3M 100.0% | $401.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $480.5M 85.0% | $472.3M 87.8% | $450.8M 91.4% | $396.2M 87.6% | $406.6M 83.8% | $349.9M 90.8% | $429.2M 88.1% | $384.8M 87.6% | $356.4M 85.4% | $335.7M 83.6% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $357.2M 85.6% | $336.6M 83.9% |
| Gross Profit | $84.6M 15.0% | $65.5M 12.2% | $42.2M 8.6% | $56.0M 12.4% | $78.7M 16.2% | $35.4M 9.2% | $57.8M 11.9% | $54.4M 12.4% | $61.0M 14.6% | $65.7M 16.4% |
| Research & Development | $21.7M 3.8% | $14.8M 2.8% | $15.9M 3.2% | $12.2M 2.7% | $10.8M 2.2% | $9.8M 2.5% | $13.8M 2.8% | $4.8M 1.1% | $4.6M 1.1% | $430K 0.1% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $61.8M 10.9% | $47.7M 8.9% | $48.2M 9.8% | $47.1M 10.4% | $44.7M 9.2% | $44.1M 11.4% | $47.2M 9.7% | $41.2M 9.4% | $46.1M 11.0% | $43.5M 10.8% |
| Operating Income | $22.8M 4.0% | $17.8M 3.3% | -$6.1M -1.2% | $8.9M 2.0% | $33.9M 7.0% | -$8.7M -2.2% | $10.6M 2.2% | $13.3M 3.0% | $14.8M 3.6% | $22.2M 5.5% |
| Interest Expense | $1.0M 0.2% | $900K 0.2% | $960K 0.2% | $221K 0.0% | $302K 0.1% | $920K 0.2% | $1.6M 0.3% | $1.1M 0.3% | $417K 0.1% | $176K 0.0% |
| Interest & Investment Income | $2.0M 0.4% | $572K 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | $8K 0.0% | $136K 0.0% | $25K 0.0% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | $820K 0.1% | $2.7M 0.5% | -$2.2M -0.4% | $406K 0.1% | -$1.2M -0.2% | $1.7M 0.4% | -$337K -0.1% | $1.0M 0.2% | $1.2M 0.3% | -$603K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $24.6M 4.4% | $20.2M 3.8% | -$7.7M -1.6% | $9.3M 2.0% | $35.0M 7.2% | -$8.1M -2.1% | -$20.4M -4.2% | $17.7M 4.0% | $16.4M 3.9% | $19.2M 4.8% |
| Income Tax Expense | $5.7M 1.0% | $3.8M 0.7% | $1.3M 0.3% | $415K 0.1% | $5.1M 1.1% | -$2.3M -0.6% | -$7.7M -1.6% | $2.1M 0.5% | $4.3M 1.0% | $5.1M 1.3% |
| Net Income | $18.7M 3.3% | $16.3M 3.0% | -$6.7M -1.4% | $7.0M 1.6% | $22.5M 4.6% | -$7.6M -2.0% | -$17.0M -3.5% | $12.3M 2.8% | $7.2M 1.7% | $9.1M 2.3% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $4.64 | $4.10 | $-1.70 | $1.82 | $5.95 | $-2.04 | $-4.63 | $3.39 | $2.01 | $2.55 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $4.58 | $4.07 | $-1.70 | $1.79 | $5.85 | $-2.04 | $-4.63 | $3.32 | $1.96 | $2.51 |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 4.0M | 4.0M | 3.9M | 3.9M | 3.8M | 3.7M | 3.7M | 3.6M | 3.6M | 3.6M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 4.1M | 4.0M | 3.9M | 3.9M | 3.9M | 3.7M | 3.7M | 3.7M | 3.7M | 3.6M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $65M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 8%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit.
Cash vs short-term debt unavailable.
Short-term / long-term split not separately reported.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 3-yr range · 100th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 3-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 5.5× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 87.6 | 88.1 | 90.8 | 83.8 | 87.6 | 91.4 | 87.8 | 85.0 |
| Gross Profit | 12.4 | 11.9 | 9.2 | 16.2 | 12.4 | 8.6 | 12.2 | 15.0 |
| R&D | 1.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.8 |
| Operating Income | 3.0 | 2.2 | -2.2 | 7.0 | 2.0 | -1.2 | 3.3 | 4.0 |
| Income Tax | 0.5 | -1.6 | -0.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Net Income | 2.8 | -3.5 | -2.0 | 4.6 | 1.6 | -1.4 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on STRT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position