Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Held by 995 of 5,944 reporting institutions (99th percentile) — extremely crowded.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2026
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.14B 100.0% | $10.21B 100.0% | $9.96B 100.0% | $9.45B 100.0% | $8.82B 100.0% | $8.61B 100.0% | $8.34B 100.0% | $8.12B 100.0% | $7.58B 100.0% | $7.32B 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.43B 48.4% | $4.89B 47.9% | $4.94B 49.6% | $4.68B 49.5% | $4.11B 46.6% | $4.15B 48.2% | $4.19B 50.2% | $4.04B 49.7% | $3.77B 49.7% | $3.80B 51.9% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3.77B 49.7% | $3.80B 51.9% |
| Gross Profit | $4.71B 51.6% | $5.31B 52.1% | $5.02B 50.4% | $4.77B 50.5% | $4.71B 53.4% | $4.47B 51.8% | $4.15B 49.8% | $4.08B 50.3% | $3.81B 50.3% | $3.52B 48.1% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $1.85B 20.2% | $1.95B 19.1% | $1.83B 18.4% | $1.93B 20.4% | $1.71B 19.4% | $1.67B 19.4% | $1.62B 19.4% | $1.67B 20.6% | $1.53B 20.2% | $1.39B 19.0% |
| Operating Income | $2.72B 29.8% | $354.9M 3.5% | $3.17B 31.8% | $2.84B 30.1% | $2.33B 26.4% | $2.79B 32.4% | $2.15B 25.8% | $2.41B 29.7% | $2.28B 30.1% | $2.39B 32.6% |
| Interest Expense | $361.6M 4.0% | $418.4M 4.1% | $443.6M 4.5% | -$415.9M -4.4% | — | — | — | $379.1M 4.7% | $334.3M 4.4% | $335.1M 4.6% |
| Interest & Investment Income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $12.0M 0.1% | $2.3M 0.0% | $1.8M 0.0% |
| Pretax Income | $2.38B 26.0% | -$82.8M -0.8% | $2.22B 22.3% | $383.6M 4.1% | $310.4M 3.5% | $2.54B 29.5% | -$945.2M -11.3% | $4.14B 51.1% | $2.34B 30.8% | $2.08B 28.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | $621.0M 6.8% | -$51.7M -0.5% | $456.6M 4.6% | $422.1M 4.5% | $309.4M 3.5% | $511.1M 5.9% | -$966.6M -11.6% | $685.9M 8.5% | $22.7M 0.3% | $550.3M 7.5% |
| Net Income | $1.69B 18.5% | -$81.4M -0.8% | $1.73B 17.3% | -$71.0M -0.8% | -$40.4M -0.5% | $2.00B 23.2% | -$11.8M -0.1% | $3.44B 42.3% | $2.30B 30.4% | $1.53B 20.9% |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $130.64 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 6.6%/yr for a decade (off $1.7B normalized FCF).
The market's 6.6% is more conservative than its 8-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.17B shares (market data) · net debt $9.9B
mean 11.7% · volatility σ 25% · implied rate exceeded in 3/8 yrs
Central path = implied 6.6%/yr growth; shaded band = ±1σ (25%) of this company's historical FCF volatility, widening with time. The wider the band, the less certain the growth.
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
6/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Earnings are backed by cash (FCF ≥ net income) — high quality. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
The dividend is comfortably covered — only 40% of free cash flow, leaving room to grow it and fund buybacks. Last year: $716M dividends + $924M buybacks = $1.6B returned on $1.8B FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A balanced mix of reinvestment and shareholder returns.
Modest payoff on reinvested capital. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $102M is below the $1.8B due within a year — relies on refinancing or operating cash flow. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2026-05-31 (10-Q).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~3.6% on $10.0B of debt.
Cash of $102M is below short-term debt of $272M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2026 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Profit and sales moved in opposite directions this year.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 49.7 | 50.2 | 48.2 | 46.6 | 49.5 | 49.6 | 47.9 | 48.4 |
| Gross Profit | 50.3 | 49.8 | 51.8 | 53.4 | 50.5 | 50.4 | 52.1 | 51.6 |
| SG&A | 20.6 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 20.4 | 18.4 | 19.1 | 20.2 |
| Operating Income | 29.7 | 25.8 | 32.4 | 26.4 | 30.1 | 31.8 | 3.5 | 29.8 |
| Income Tax | 8.5 | -11.6 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | -0.5 | 6.8 |
| Net Income | 42.3 | -0.1 | 23.2 | -0.5 | -0.8 | 17.3 | -0.8 | 18.5 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on STZ: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
Ranked against 235 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT | $896.8B | 41.1× | — | 1.3× | 4.7% | 24.9% | 3.1% | 22.0% | 15.5% | — | 4,273 |
| COST | $417.5B | 51.7× | 31.9× | 1.5× | 8.2% | 12.8% | 2.9% | 27.8% | 23.2% | 0.4× | 4,050 |
| KO | $373.6B | 28.6× | 24.5× | 7.8× | 1.9% | 61.6% | 27.3% | 40.7% | 40.7% | — | 3,427 |
| PG | $345.0B | 22.6× | 16.3× | 4.1× | 0.3% | 51.2% | 19.0% | 30.6% | 18.4% | 1.5× | 3,849 |
| PM | $294.0B | 26.0× | 17.1× | 7.2× | 7.3% | 67.1% | 27.9% | -114% | -115% | 0.0× | 2,744 |
| PEP | $190.0B | 23.1× | 15.4× | 2.0× | 2.3% | 54.1% | 8.8% | 40.4% | 11.8% | 3.3× | 3,404 |
| BUDFF | $151.5B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| UNLYF | $138.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| MO | $114.6B | 16.6× | 13.2× | 4.9× | -3.1% | 62.5% | 29.8% | -198% | 33.7% | 2.4× | 2,375 |
| MNST | $92.4B | — | 35.6× | 11.1× | 10.7% | 55.8% | 23.0% | 23.1% | 23.1% | — | 1,169 |
| MDLZ | $81.0B | 33.1× | 19.0× | 2.1× | 5.8% | 28.4% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.6× | 1,821 |
| CL | $74.7B | 35.5× | 20.4× | 3.7× | 1.4% | 60.1% | 10.5% | 3948% | 30.8% | 1.7× | 1,873 |
| TGT | $66.9B | 18.2× | 9.8× | 0.6× | -1.7% | 27.9% | 3.5% | 22.9% | 12.1% | 1.7× | 1,771 |
| DGEAF | $54.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| CCEP | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 543 |
| ABEV | $47.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 383 |
| JBS | $45.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 241 |
| FMX | $42.4B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 290 |
| KDP | $41.8B | 20.1× | 14.1× | 2.5× | 8.2% | 54.2% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 5.0% | 4.0× | 784 |
| SYY | $41.1B | 22.6× | 10.3× | 0.5× | 3.2% | 18.4% | 2.2% | 99.9% | 99.9% | — | 1,489 |
| KVUE | $37.7B | 25.9× | 15.7× | 2.5× | -2.1% | 58.1% | 9.7% | 13.7% | 7.1% | 3.4× | 967 |
| ADM | $37.6B | 34.8× | — | 0.5× | -6.2% | 6.3% | 1.3% | 4.7% | 3.6% | — | 1,070 |
| KMB | $37.3B | 18.5× | 11.8× | 2.3× | -2.1% | 36.0% | 12.3% | 135% | 92.0% | 0.2× | 1,585 |
| KR | $37.0B | 36.8× | 9.2× | 0.3× | 0.4% | — | 0.7% | 17.1% | 5.0% | 2.8× | 1,327 |
| HSY | $36.4B | — | 21.2× | 3.1× | 4.4% | 33.5% | 7.6% | 19.0% | 9.3% | 2.5× | 1,406 |
| STZ | $22.3B | — | 10.2× | 2.4× | -10.5% | 51.6% | 18.5% | 20.9% | 9.3% | 3.2× | 995 |
Peers = companies sharing STZ's sector (Consumer Defensive) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.