Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Strong institutional distribution: ownership decreased -4.53% quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Top 40 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
Ranked against 633 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | $33.13T | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 160 |
| CAT | $405.3B | 46.3× | 32.2× | 6.0× | 4.3% | 33.8% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 15.4% | 2.7× | 3,616 |
| GE | $399.8B | 46.8× | — | 8.7× | 18.5% | — | 19.0% | 46.6% | 22.2% | — | 3,077 |
| RTX | $298.4B | 44.8× | 21.3× | 3.4× | 9.7% | — | 7.6% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 0.0× | 3,277 |
| ABBNY | $187.8B | 50.7× | 33.5× | 5.8× | 9.5% | 34.8% | 11.9% | 28.5% | 20.4% | 0.9× | 48 |
| UNP | $175.3B | 24.7× | 16.7× | 7.2× | 1.1% | — | 29.1% | 38.7% | 14.2% | 2.6× | 2,648 |
| ETN | $173.5B | 42.8× | — | 6.3× | 10.3% | 37.6% | 14.9% | 21.0% | 13.9% | — | 2,398 |
| DE | $165.5B | 33.1× | — | 3.6× | -11.7% | — | 11.0% | 19.4% | 12.6% | — | 2,491 |
| HON | $157.6B | 33.7× | 18.9× | 4.2× | 7.8% | 36.9% | 12.6% | 34.0% | 9.8% | 3.6× | 2,694 |
| HTHIF | $153.6B | 0.7× | — | 0.0× | 3.9% | 25.2% | 2.6% | 16.6% | 7.4% | — | 2 |
| LMT | $132.3B | 26.9× | 17.0× | 1.8× | 5.6% | 10.2% | 6.7% | 74.6% | 18.4% | 2.4× | 2,807 |
| PH | $127.9B | 36.8× | 28.7× | 6.4× | -0.4% | 36.9% | 17.8% | 25.8% | 16.7% | 1.6× | 1,845 |
| HWM | $117.0B | 78.5× | 51.2× | 14.2× | 11.1% | — | 18.3% | 28.2% | 18.4% | 1.2× | 1,399 |
| ADP | $109.5B | 27.1× | — | 5.3× | 7.1% | 46.0% | 19.8% | 65.9% | 40.1% | — | 2,179 |
| TT | $107.8B | 37.3× | 26.5× | 5.1× | 7.5% | — | 13.7% | 34.0% | 22.1% | 1.1× | 1,658 |
| VRT | $106.3B | 81.5× | 50.3× | 10.4× | 27.7% | 36.3% | 13.0% | 33.8% | 19.5% | 1.4× | 1,748 |
| GD | $103.9B | 24.9× | 18.1× | 2.0× | 10.1% | — | 8.0% | 16.4% | 12.5% | 1.3× | 2,123 |
| PWR | $102.2B | 100.4× | 50.3× | 3.6× | 20.3% | 15.0% | 3.7% | 11.7% | 11.7% | 0.0× | 1,659 |
| JCI | $100.1B | 30.6× | — | 4.2× | 2.8% | 36.4% | 13.9% | 25.5% | 14.4% | — | 1,487 |
| MMM | $96.6B | 30.4× | 18.4× | 3.9× | 1.5% | 39.9% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 18.8% | 2.1× | 2,051 |
| CSX | $95.1B | 33.2× | 15.3× | 6.8× | -3.1% | — | 20.5% | 22.0% | 22.0% | — | 1,791 |
| EMR | $91.4B | 40.2× | — | 5.1× | 3.0% | 52.8% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 6.9% | — | 2,112 |
| UPS | $91.4B | 16.4× | 10.1× | 1.0× | -2.6% | — | 6.3% | 34.3% | 13.8% | 2.2× | 2,025 |
| WM | $90.4B | 33.5× | 12.7× | 3.6× | 14.2% | 40.4% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 25.3% | 0.1× | 2,262 |
| CMI | $89.7B | 31.7× | 16.9× | 2.7× | -1.3% | 25.3% | 8.8% | 23.9% | 23.9% | — | 1,877 |
| TATT | $553M | 31.1× | 21.4× | 3.1× | 17.0% | 24.8% | 9.4% | 9.5% | 9.1% | 0.4× | 76 |
Peers = companies sharing TATT's sector (Industrials) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 9%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Cash of $51M covers all $12M of scheduled principal — no refinancing pressure. Scheduled principal only (excludes interest & revolver draws). As of 2025-12-31 (20-F).
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest is easily covered by operating profit. Effective rate ~10.6% on $9M of debt.
Cash of $51M fully covers short-term debt of $2M.
Mostly long-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). See the maturity ladder above for the year-by-year repayment schedule.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Maturity ladder from the SEC long-term-debt repayment schedule. Educational — not a recommendation.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
To be worth $42.62 today, the market must believe free cash flow compounds 33.4%/yr for a decade (off $4M normalized FCF).
The market's 33.4% is more conservative than its 6-yr track record.
2-stage DCF · 0.01B shares · net debt -$42M
Reverse DCF: rather than guessing a fair value, we solve for the growth the current price implies, then you stress-test the assumptions. Enterprise value of the FCF stream, less net debt, ÷ shares. Educational — not a recommendation.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Eight indices comparing this year to last (receivables, margins, asset quality, growth, accruals, leverage). Above −1.78 suggests possible manipulation; below −2.22 is clean.
A screen, not proof — high growth alone can raise it.
Cash conversion lags reported earnings — watch accruals. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Comfortably covers interest; leverage falling year-over-year.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned on $4M FCF.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $178.0M 100.0% | $152.1M 100.0% | $113.8M 100.0% | $84.6M 100.0% | $78.0M 100.0% | $75.4M 100.0% | $97.5M 100.0% | $87.7M 100.0% | $106.5M 100.0% | $95.8M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $133.9M 75.2% | $119.1M 78.3% | $91.3M 80.3% | $68.6M 81.2% | $66.7M 85.5% | $66.9M 88.8% | $82.2M 84.3% | $79.8M 90.9% | $86.1M 80.8% | $76.8M 80.1% |
| Cost of Products | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $28.1M 26.4% | $23.8M 24.8% |
| Cost of Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $58.0M 54.4% | $53.0M 55.3% |
| Gross Profit | $44.1M 24.8% | $33.0M 21.7% | $22.5M 19.7% | $15.9M 18.8% | $11.3M 14.5% | $8.4M 11.2% | $15.3M 15.7% | $7.9M 9.1% | $20.4M 19.2% | $19.0M 19.9% |
| Research & Development | $1.4M 0.8% | $1.2M 0.8% | $715K 0.6% | $479K 0.6% | $517K 0.7% | $185K 0.2% | $113K 0.1% | $458K 0.5% | $731K 0.7% | $1.1M 1.2% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $15.7M 8.8% | $11.9M 7.8% | $10.6M 9.3% | $10.0M 11.8% | $8.4M 10.7% | $7.6M 10.1% | $7.7M 7.9% | $7.9M 9.0% | $9.4M 8.8% | $10.0M 10.5% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $25.3M 14.2% | $20.5M 13.5% | $16.4M 14.4% | $17.7M 20.9% | $15.3M 19.6% | $12.5M 16.6% | $12.7M 13.0% | $13.1M 14.9% | $15.2M 14.2% | $14.9M 15.6% |
| Operating Income | $18.8M 10.6% | $12.5M 8.2% | $6.1M 5.3% | -$1.8M -2.1% | -$4.0M -5.2% | -$4.0M -5.4% | $2.6M 2.7% | -$5.2M -5.9% | $5.3M 5.0% | $4.1M 4.3% |
| Interest Expense | $1.0M 0.6% | $1.5M 1.0% | $1.7M 1.5% | $902K 1.1% | $250K 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other Income (Expense), net | -$325K -0.2% | -$477K -0.3% | $353K 0.3% | $1.0M 1.2% | -$290K -0.4% | -$96K -0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Pretax Income | $17.5M 9.8% | $10.6M 6.9% | $4.7M 4.1% | -$1.6M -1.8% | -$4.0M -5.1% | -$3.5M -4.6% | $1.5M 1.5% | -$3.9M -4.5% | $4.9M 4.6% | $4.0M 4.2% |
| Income Tax Expense | $2.1M 1.2% | $195K 0.1% | $576K 0.5% | $98K 0.1% | -$662K -0.8% | -$1.5M -2.0% | $589K 0.6% | -$1.5M -1.7% | $2.3M 2.2% | $3.9M 4.0% |
| Net Income | $16.8M 9.4% | $11.2M 7.3% | $4.7M 4.1% | -$1.6M -1.8% | -$3.6M -4.6% | -$5.3M -7.1% | $806K 0.8% | -$4.4M -5.0% | — | — |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | $1.39 | $1.08 | $0.52 | $-0.17 | $-0.40 | $-0.60 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.37 | $1.00 | $0.51 | $-0.17 | $-0.40 | $-0.60 | — | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 12.1M | 10.4M | 9.0M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.8M | 8.8M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 12.3M | 11.2M | 9.1M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.8M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
No material risks flagged.
Where each multiple sits in its own 14-yr range · 80th pct blended
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 14-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Returns are margin-driven, not leverage-driven — higher quality.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
High operating leverage: profit moved 3.0× as fast as sales — great in an upturn, painful in a downturn.
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 90.9 | 84.3 | 88.8 | 85.5 | 81.2 | 80.3 | 78.3 | 75.2 |
| Gross Profit | 9.1 | 15.7 | 11.2 | 14.5 | 18.8 | 19.7 | 21.7 | 24.8 |
| R&D | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| SG&A | 9.0 | 7.9 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 11.8 | 9.3 | 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Operating Income | -5.9 | 2.7 | -5.4 | -5.2 | -2.1 | 5.3 | 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Income Tax | -1.7 | 0.6 | -2.0 | -0.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.2 |
| Net Income | -5.0 | 0.8 | -7.1 | -4.6 | -1.8 | 4.1 | 7.3 | 9.4 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TATT: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.