Loading institutional data...
Loading institutional data...
Institutional ownership roughly stable: +0.00% change quarter-over-quarter.
Data as of Q1 2026
Loading snapshot...
Loading financials...
Loading valuation...
Loading quality & risk...
Loading dividends & returns...
Loading capital allocation...
Loading debt & leverage...
Loading performance...
Loading peer comparison...
Loading ownership map...
Loading crowding analysis...
Loading conviction analysis...
Loading buy/sell flow...
Loading ownership trends...
Loading top holders...
Loading top holders...
Ranked against 207 sector peers with collected financials. Valuation from latest close × latest fiscal-year fundamentals; 13F conviction as of 2026-03-31.
Percentile is “goodness” within the peer set (100 = best). For valuation and leverage that means cheaper / less-levered ranks higher.
| Company | Mkt cap ▼ | P/E | EV/EBITDA | P/S | Rev gr | Gross | Net | ROE | ROIC | Net D/EBITDA | 13F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $1.48T | 25.1× | 14.8× | 7.4× | 22.2% | 82.0% | 30.1% | 27.8% | 21.9% | 0.6× | 4,839 |
| CHT | $326.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 206 |
| NFLX | $313.3B | 29.3× | 23.3× | 6.9× | 15.9% | 48.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 26.7% | 1.1× | 3,458 |
| CCZ | $237.8B | 11.9× | 6.3× | 1.9× | -0.0% | — | 16.2% | 20.6% | 19.4% | 0.2× | 1 |
| VZ | $196.4B | 11.4× | 7.5× | 1.4× | 2.5% | — | 12.7% | 16.7% | 6.7% | 3.6× | 3,122 |
| DIS | $193.3B | 14.9× | 9.8× | 2.0× | 3.4% | — | 13.1% | 11.3% | 8.5% | 1.5× | 2,883 |
| VEON | $100.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 97 |
| SPOT | $99.3B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,205 |
| DASH | $88.5B | 97.3× | 57.2× | 6.5× | 27.9% | — | 6.8% | 9.3% | 9.3% | — | 973 |
| AMXOF | $78.1B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| WBD | $64.4B | 89.5× | 14.4× | 1.7× | -5.1% | — | 1.9% | 2.0% | 1.1% | 5.1× | 1,259 |
| EA | $52.6B | 59.7× | 38.2× | 7.0× | 0.9% | 79.0% | 11.8% | 13.1% | 13.1% | — | 998 |
| ORANY | $48.8B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| TIMB | $43.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 150 |
| TTWO | $43.6B | — | 472.2× | 6.5× | 18.2% | 57.2% | -4.5% | -8.5% | -4.9% | 26.7× | 1,011 |
| LYV | $43.2B | — | 27.3× | 1.7× | 8.8% | — | 2.0% | 183% | 5.9% | 5.0× | 779 |
| VIV | $39.0B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 214 |
| BAIDF | $36.4B | — | 149.3× | 2.0× | -86.1% | 43.9% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 26.2× | 7 |
| TWLO | $29.4B | 920.1× | 84.2× | 5.8× | 13.7% | 48.9% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.8× | 776 |
| RDDT | $28.9B | 59.3× | 61.1× | 13.1× | 69.4% | 91.2% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 18.1% | — | 765 |
| OMC | $25.6B | — | 59.2× | 1.5× | 10.1% | 8.5% | -0.3% | -0.5% | -0.3% | 15.8× | 1,083 |
| FOX | $24.1B | 10.6× | — | 1.5× | 16.6% | — | 14.1% | 19.2% | 12.4% | — | 505 |
| FWONB | $22.6B | — | 41.0× | 5.0× | 22.7% | — | 12.4% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 7.9× | 1 |
| ROKU | $21.7B | 249.1× | 503.8× | 4.6× | 15.2% | 43.8% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% | — | 665 |
| CHTR | $20.7B | 4.2× | 5.4× | 0.4× | -0.6% | — | 9.1% | 31.1% | 4.5% | 4.5× | 760 |
| TC | $54M | — | — | 64.0× | -87.4% | 2.8% | 38.1% | 1.7% | 1.3% | — | 4 |
Peers = companies sharing TC's sector (Communication Services) with collected SEC financials. Multiples use the most recent end-of-day close and latest fiscal-year fundamentals (trailing, not forward). Missing cells mean the peer never reported that line item, has no collected price, or has a non-positive denominator. Not investment advice.
How management deployed cash over 10 years — and what it earned on reinvestment.
A reinvestment story — most cash went back into growth rather than to shareholders.
Reinvestment has been productive — operating income grew well per dollar put in. Current ROIC on all capital: 1%. Rough measure (includes maintenance capex).
Cash uses aggregated from the SEC cash-flow statement over 10 fiscal years. "Return on reinvestment" is a rough proxy — operating-income change ÷ cumulative CapEx + M&A — and includes maintenance capex. Educational — not a recommendation.
Top 4 institutional holders — bubble size is position value, color is the move since last quarter. Hover any holder for detail.
Drag any bubble to rearrange · size = dollar value of the position
How much the company owes, how it's trended, and how comfortably it's serviced.
Insufficient EBITDA/debt history.
Green ≤ 1.5× · amber ≤ 3× · red > 3× (leverage relative to cash earnings).
Interest expense isn't separately reported — often netted into “other income (expense), net.”
Cash of $140000 is below short-term debt of $6M — relies on refinancing/operations.
Mostly short-term debt (balance-sheet current vs non-current split). A year-by-year maturity schedule wasn't disclosed for this issuer.
Debt, cash, interest and equity from the SEC balance sheet & income statement. Effective rate = interest ÷ average debt. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total shares institutions bought (green) vs sold (red) each quarter across all holders.
Inferred from quarter-over-quarter change in each fund's 13F position (new stakes count as buys, exits as sells). Not tick-level trades.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05 · 15d old
How a revenue dollar becomes profit — FY2025
Each value shows its share of revenue below it (common-size).
| Line Item | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | FY2020 | FY2019 | FY2018 | FY2017 | FY2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $847K 100.0% | $6.7M 100.0% | $162.4M 100.0% | $183.2M 100.0% | $357.6M 100.0% | $330.2M 100.0% | $644.8M 100.0% | $651.0M 100.0% | $280.7M 100.0% | $117.4M 100.0% |
| Cost of Revenue | $823K 97.2% | $2.1M 31.7% | $68.9M 42.5% | $70.5M 38.5% | $85.3M 23.9% | $88.8M 26.9% | $186.5M 28.9% | $183.4M 28.2% | $85.7M 30.5% | $17.7M 15.1% |
| Gross Profit | $24K 2.8% | $4.6M 68.3% | $93.4M 57.5% | $112.7M 61.5% | $272.3M 76.1% | $241.4M 73.1% | $458.2M 71.1% | $467.6M 71.8% | $194.9M 69.5% | $99.6M 84.9% |
| Research & Development | — | $1.6M 24.2% | $11.3M 6.9% | $19.8M 10.8% | $35.7M 10.0% | $34.3M 10.4% | $43.3M 6.7% | $19.3M 3.0% | $15.9M 5.7% | $19.6M 16.7% |
| Selling, General & Admin | $5.0M 585.0% | $37.6M 557.8% | $24.5M 15.1% | $64.7M 35.3% | $72.8M 20.4% | $98.8M 29.9% | $103.9M 16.1% | $84.4M 13.0% | $27.5M 9.8% | $24.5M 20.8% |
| Total Operating Expenses | $5.0M 585.0% | $37.6M 557.8% | $24.5M 15.1% | $231.9M 126.6% | $383.1M 107.1% | $412.8M 125.0% | $719.3M 111.6% | $535.7M 82.3% | $266.7M 95.0% | $180.7M 154.0% |
| Operating Income | -$4.9M -582.2% | -$37.6M -557.8% | -$24.5M -15.1% | -$119.3M -65.1% | -$110.8M -31.0% | -$171.3M -51.9% | -$261.0M -40.5% | -$68.0M -10.5% | -$71.7M -25.6% | -$81.1M -69.1% |
| Other Income (Expense), net | — | $370K 5.5% | $502K 0.3% | $5.7M 3.1% | $8.9M 2.5% | $3.5M 1.1% | $5.3M 0.8% | -$465K -0.1% | $52K 0.0% | -$226K -0.2% |
| Pretax Income | $6.1M 717.9% | -$94.3M -1399.3% | -$3.2M -1.9% | -$171.9M -93.9% | -$101.9M -28.5% | -$164.5M -49.8% | -$251.3M -39.0% | -$75.1M -11.5% | -$75.7M -27.0% | -$81.5M -69.5% |
| Income Tax Expense | — | — | $0 0.0% | -$5.5M -3.0% | $0 0.0% | -$1.0M -0.3% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% | $0 0.0% |
| Net Income | $323K 38.1% | -$188.0M -2790.4% | -$83.0M -51.1% | -$166.5M -90.9% | -$101.9M -28.5% | -$163.5M -49.5% | -$251.3M -39.0% | -$78.7M -12.1% | -$90.7M -32.3% | -$86.6M -73.8% |
| Per Share | ||||||||||
| EPS (Basic) | — | $-0.36 | $-0.20 | $-0.52 | $-0.33 | $-0.54 | $-0.85 | — | — | — |
| EPS (Diluted) | — | $-0.36 | $-0.20 | $-0.52 | $-0.33 | $-0.54 | $-0.85 | — | — | — |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Basic) | 569.1M | 520.2M | 406.8M | 319.5M | 306.8M | 304.4M | 294.9M | 121.9M | 94.9M | 89.4M |
| Weighted Avg Shares (Diluted) | 569.1M | 520.2M | 406.8M | 319.5M | 306.8M | 304.4M | 294.9M | 121.9M | 94.9M | 89.4M |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL filings (annual, fiscal year). Quarterly flow items are derived from cumulative filings; balance-sheet figures are as-of each period end. Ratios and margins are computed, not reported.
Solve the discounted cash flow backwards, then stress-test the assumptions.
This company doesn't have positive free cash flow, so a reverse DCF can't be run.
Is the value real, and is the business safe? Academic scores + earnings quality + solvency, from SEC filings.
4/8 of the 9 checks — 1 couldn't be scored (see above), so the score is out of the 8 with data.
Safe > 2.99 · grey 1.81–2.99 · distress < 1.81
Needs granular two-year detail (receivables, PP&E, D&A, SG&A) — not fully reported.
Cash-conversion data unavailable. Lower/negative accruals = higher quality (Sloan).
Coverage data unavailable.
F-Score (0–9 fundamental momentum), Altman Z (distress risk), and Beneish M (earnings-manipulation screen) are academic models computed from the SEC filings. Screens and context — educational, not recommendations.
What the company returns to shareholders — and whether it's covered by cash.
No dividend to cover. Last year: $0 dividends + $0 buybacks = $0 returned.
Yields use the latest fiscal-year dividends/buybacks over current market cap. Dividends and buybacks from the SEC cash-flow statement; payout coverage vs net income and free cash flow. Educational — not a recommendation.
Total return (dividends reinvested) vs the market, from quarter-end prices.
Above 0 = ahead of the S&P 500 since the window start; below 0 = behind. Rising means it's pulling ahead.
How far the stock fell below its prior peak. Deeper, longer drawdowns = a rougher ride to the same return.
Quarter-end, dividend-adjusted (total return). Beta & volatility from quarterly returns (annualized). Benchmark is the S&P 500 (SPY total return). Annual returns compound the quarters ending in each calendar year; the first and last years in a window may be partial. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
EOD close · as of 2026-08-05
Where each multiple sits in its own 8-yr range
Dot = today · shaded = middle 50% · line = median. Lower percentile = cheaper vs its own 8-yr history.
Is the profit real, and how strong is the balance sheet?
FY2025 · every deduction from revenue to net income
DuPont — the three levers
Watch the leverage lever — a chunk of ROE comes from the balance sheet.
What the company owes vs. what it holds
Year-by-year maturities aren't in SEC companyfacts (footnote-only), so this shows the debt/cash structure and net leverage instead.
Latest year: profit growth vs revenue growth
Low operating leverage — profit tracks sales closely (stable, less cyclical).
Each line as % of revenue — the trend in color
| % of revenue | FY2018 | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of Revenue | 28.2 | 28.9 | 26.9 | 23.9 | 38.5 | 42.5 | 31.7 | 97.2 |
| Gross Profit | 71.8 | 71.1 | 73.1 | 76.1 | 61.5 | 57.5 | 68.3 | 2.8 |
| R&D | 3.0 | 6.7 | 10.4 | 10.0 | 10.8 | 6.9 | 24.2 | — |
| SG&A | 13.0 | 16.1 | 29.9 | 20.4 | 35.3 | 15.1 | 557.8 | 585.0 |
| Operating Income | -10.5 | -40.5 | -51.9 | -31.0 | -65.1 | -15.1 | -557.8 | -582.2 |
| Income Tax | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 0.0 | -3.0 | 0.0 | — | — |
| Net Income | -12.1 | -39.0 | -49.5 | -28.5 | -90.9 | -51.1 | -2790.4 | 38.1 |
Green = margin-favorable vs the row's own range · red = unfavorable.
The metrics that matter, over time
A 30-second read on TC: price, valuation, headline fundamentals, and an auto-generated scorecard from SEC filings. Flags are rule-based signals, not recommendations.